Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 87–98 | Cite as

The effect of raising the scala tympani potassium concentration on the tone-induced cochlear responses of the guinea pig

  • A. N. Salt
  • P. E. Stopp
Article

Summary

Scala tympani (ST) in guinea pig was perfused with modified Ringer's solutions containing 5–50 mM potassium; tone-induced cochlear responses from the basal turn of ST were compared before, during and after perfusions.

The compound nerve action potential (N1) and afterpotential (a/p) amplitudes were reduced, especially above 20 mM; the summating potential (SP) was variable, but its onset shape changed consistently with 13–20 mM levels. However, the cochlear microphonic amplitude (CM) remained substantially unchanged even at the 35 mM level. K+ concentration was monitored in ST with ion-sensitive pipettes. Stable levels were reached within 2 min, but N1 responses continued to fall beyond this time. Recovery to normal K+ levels took place spontaneously and the concentration curve which resulted showed a 2-slope characteristic.

These experiments question whether elevated potassium concentration in scala tympani depolarizes the hair cells, and if it does, whether the hair cell resting potential is involved in the generation of the CM.

Key words

Cochlea Perfusion Elevated potassium Electrical potentials Recovery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelborg, C., Engström, B.: Inner Ear Studies II. 3. The tympanic covering layer. An electron microscope study in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. [Suppl.] (Stockh.) 319, 43–56 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. Butler, R.A.: Some experimental observations on the d.c. resting potentials in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 429–433 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. Dallos, P.: On the negative potential within the organ of Corti. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 818–819 (1968)Google Scholar
  4. Dallos, P.: The Auditory Periphery — Biophysics and Physiology, pp. 386–388. London: Academic Press 1973Google Scholar
  5. Davis, H.: Some principles of sensory receptor action. Physiol. Rev. 41, 391–416 (1961)Google Scholar
  6. Dohlman, G.F.: Histochemical studies of vestibular mechanisms. In: Neural Mechanisms of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems (eds. G.L. Rasmussen and W.F. Windle), Chapter 19, pp. 258–275. Springfield: Thomas 1960Google Scholar
  7. Flock, A.: Electron probe determination of relative ion distribution in the inner ear. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 83, 239–244 (1977)Google Scholar
  8. Galley, N., Klinke, R., Oertel, W., Pause, M., Storch, W.H.: The effect of intracochlearly administered acetylcholine — blocking agents on the efferent synapses of the cochlea. Brain Res. 64, 55–63 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Hawkins, J.E., Jr.: Vascular patterns of the membranous labyrinth. In: Third Symposium on the Role of the Vestibular Organs in Space Exploration (ed. A. Graybiel) pp. 241–257. NASA SP-152 (1967)Google Scholar
  10. Hodgkin, A.L., Horowicz, P.: The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 148, 127–160 (1959)Google Scholar
  11. Honrubia, V., Ward, P.H.: Dependence of the cochlear microphonics and the summating potential on the endocochlear potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 388–392 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Ilberg, C.V., Vosteen, K.H.: Permeability of the inner ear membranes. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 67, 165–170 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. Kohllöffel, L.U.E.: Studies of the distribution of cochlear potentials along the basilar membrane. Acta Otolaryngol. [Suppl.] (Stockh.) 288, 1–66 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. Konishi, T., Kelsey, E.: Effect of sodium deficiency on cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 462–470 (1968)Google Scholar
  15. Konishi, T., Kelsey, E.: Effect of potassium deficiency on the cochlear potentials and cation contents of the endolymph. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 76, 410–418 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Kuffler, S.W.: Neuroglial cells: physiological properties and a potassium mediated effect of neuronal activity on the glial membrane potential. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [B.] 168, 1–21 (1967)Google Scholar
  17. Lawrence, M.: Dynamic range of the cochlear transducer. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30, 159–167 (1965)Google Scholar
  18. Lawrence, M.: Resting potentials in the inner sulcus and tunnel of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 79, 304–309 (1975)Google Scholar
  19. Lim, D.J.: Surface ultrastructure of the cochlear perilymphatic space. J. Laryngol. Otol. 84, 413–428 (1970)Google Scholar
  20. Lowenstein, O.E.: Comparative Morphology and Physiology. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology VI/I (ed. H.H. Kornhuber), Chapter 2, pp. 75–120 New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  21. Naftalin, L.: Some new proposals regarding acoustic transmission and transduction. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30, 169–180 (1965)Google Scholar
  22. Naftalin, L.: The peripheral hearing mechanism: a biochemical and biological approach. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 85, 38–42 (1976)Google Scholar
  23. Panayiotopoulos, C.P., Stopp, P.E.: The characteristics of the cochlear after-potential studied in the guinea-pig by perfusion and stimulation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 210, 495–505 (1970)Google Scholar
  24. Salt, A. N.: A study into the effect of elevated potassium concentration on cochlear potentials. M. Sc. report. University of Birmingham 1974Google Scholar
  25. Salt, A.N.: The effect of increased perilymph potassium concentration on the responses of the guinea pig cochlea and factors involved in the time course of recovery. Ph.D. thesis. University of Birmingham 1977Google Scholar
  26. Sellick, P.M., Bock, G.R.: Evidence for the electrogenic potassium pump as the origin of the positive component of the endocochlear potential. Pflügers Arch. 352, 351–362 (1974)Google Scholar
  27. Sellick, P.M., Johnstone, B.M.: Production and role of inner ear fluid. Prog. Neurobiol. 5, 337–362 (1975)Google Scholar
  28. Spoendlin, H.: The Organization of the Cochlear Receptor. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Vol. 13. Basel: Karger 1966Google Scholar
  29. Stopp, P.E.: The transient electric responses of the cochlea. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 205, 353–365 (1969)Google Scholar
  30. Tanaka, Y., Asanuma, A., Yanagisawa, K., Katsuki, Y.: Electrical potentials of the subtectorial space in the guinea pig cochlea. Jpn. J. Physiol. 27, 539–549 (1977)Google Scholar
  31. Tasaki, I., Fernández, C.: Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KCl solution and by direct currents. J. Neurophysiol. 15, 497–512 (1952)Google Scholar
  32. Tasaki, I., Davis, H., Eldredge, D.H.: Exploration of cochlear potentials in guinea pig with a microelectrode. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 765–773 (1954)Google Scholar
  33. Walker, J.L., Jr.: Ion specific liquid ion exchanger microelectrodes. Anal. Chem. 43, 89A-93A (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Salt
    • 1
  • P. E. Stopp
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurocommunications Research UnitMedical School, University of BirminghamBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations