Factors influencing the force control during precision grip
- 1.2k Downloads
A small object was gripped between the tips of the index finger and thumb and held stationary in space. Its weight and surface structure could be changed between consecutive lifting trials, without changing its visual appearance. The grip force and the vertical lifting force acting on the object, as well as the vertical position of the object were continuously recorded. Likewise, the minimal grip force necessary to prevent slipping, was measured. The difference between this minimal force and the employed grip force, was defined as the safety margin to prevent slipping.
It was found that the applied grip force was critically balanced to optimize the motor behaviour so that slipping between the skin and the gripped object did not occur and the grip force did not reach exeedingly high values. To achieve this motor control, the nervous system relied on a mechanism that measured the frictional condition between the surface structure of the object and the fingers. Experiments with local anaesthesia indicated that this mechanism used information from receptors in the fingers, most likely skin mechanoreceptors. In addition to friction, the control of the grip force was heavily influenced by the weight of the object and by a safety margin factor related to the individual subject. The frictional conditions during the previous trial could also, to some extent, influence the grip force.
Key wordsPrecision grip Human hand Motor control Sensory input Cutaneous mechanoreceptors
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bowden, FP, Tabor D (1973) Friction — an introduction to tribology. Anchor Press, Garden City, NYGoogle Scholar
- Comaish S, Bottoms E (1971) The skin and friction: deviations from Amonton's law, and the effects of hydration and lubrication. Br J Dermatol 84: 37–43Google Scholar
- Garnett R, Stephens JA (1981) Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man. J Physiol (Lond) 311: 463–473Google Scholar
- Granit R (1972) Constant errors in the execution and appreciation of movement. Brain 95: 649–660Google Scholar
- Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci 6: 27–31Google Scholar
- Johansson RS, Westling G (1981) Coordination between grip force and vertical lifting force when lifting objects between index finger and thumb. Soc Neurosci Abstr 7: 247Google Scholar
- Kuypers HGJM (1981) Anatomy of the descending pathways. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, sect 1, vol II. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, MD, pp 597–666Google Scholar
- Lawrence DG, Kuypers HGJM (1968) The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 91: 1–14Google Scholar
- Lemon RN (1981) Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers. J Physiol (Lond) 311: 497–311Google Scholar
- Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1977) The sensory mechanism of servoaction in human muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 265: 521–535Google Scholar
- McCloskey DI, Gandevia SG (1978) Role of skin, joints and muscles and of corollary discharges, in human discrimination tasks. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 177–187Google Scholar
- Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Jt Surg 38B: 902–913Google Scholar
- Torebjörk HE, Hagbarth K-E, Eklund G (1978) Tonic finger flexion reflex induced by vibratory activation of digital mechanoreceptors. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 197–203Google Scholar
- Vierck CJ (1978) Interpretations of the sensory and motor consequences of dorsal column lesions. In: Gordon G (ed) Active touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 139–159Google Scholar
- Westling G, Johansson RS (1980) Factors setting the grip force when lifting an object with index and thumb. Neurosci Letters [Suppl] 5: 113Google Scholar
- Wilkes GL, Windnauer H, Brown IA (1973) Structure-property relationships of skin. CRC Crit Rev Bioengin 1: 453–495Google Scholar