Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 376–386

Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity

  • Susan D. Iversen
  • Mortimer Mishkin
Article

Summary

Monkeys with lesions of the inferior frontal convexity were impaired relative to controls in retaining an auditory frequency differentiation (although subsequent thresholds were normal) and in learning object and spatial reversals. Performance was characterized by perseverative interference, a frontal symptom which now seems attributable to damage to the inferior convexity.

Key Words

Prefrontal cortex Ablation Supramodal deficit Perseverative interference 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akert, K.: Comparative anatomy of the frontal cortex and thalamocortical connections. In: “The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behaviour”. Ed. by J. M. Warren and K. Akert. McGraw-Hill. pp. 372–394 (1964).Google Scholar
  2. Bättig, K., Rosvold, H.E., Mishkin, M.: Comparison of the effects of frontal and caudate lesions on discrimination learning in monkeys. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 55, 458–463 (1962).Google Scholar
  3. Brutkowski, S., Mishkin, M., Rosvold, H.E.: Positive and inhibitory motor conditioned reflexes in monkeys after ablation of orbital or dorso-lateral surface of the frontal cortex. In: Central and Peripheral Mechanisms of Motor Functions. Ed. by E. Gutmann and P. Hnik. Prague: Czech. Acad. Sci. pp. 133–141 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. Iversen, S.D., Weiskrantz, L.: The acquisition of conditional discriminations in Baboons following temporal and frontal lesions. Exp. Neurol. 19, 78–91 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. Jeffress, L.A.: An electronic switching circuit. Amer. J. Psychol. 63, 257–259 (1950).Google Scholar
  6. Lawicka, W., Mishkin, M., Rosvold, H. E.: Dissociation of impairment on auditory tasks following orbital and dorsolateral frontal lesions in monkeys. In: Proc. X. Congr. Polish Physiol. Soo. Lublin. Polish Physiol. Soc. p. 178 (1966).Google Scholar
  7. Mishkin, M.: Perseveration of central sets after frontal lesions in monkeys. In: “The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behaviour”. Ed by J.M. Warren and K. Akert. McGraw-Hill. pp. 219–241 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. —, Vest, B., Waxier, M., Rosvold, H. E.: A re-examination of the effects of frontal lesions on object alternation. Neuropsychologia 7, 357–363 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. Pribram, K.H., Chow, K.L., Semmes, J.: Limit and organization of the cortical projection from the medial thalamic nucleus in monkey. J. comp. Neurol. 98, 433–448 (1953).Google Scholar
  10. Settlage, P., Zable, M., Harlow, H.F.: Problem solution by monkeys following bilateral removal of the prefrontal areas: VI. Performance on tests requiring contradictory reactions to similar and to identical stimuli. J. exp. Psychol. 38, 50–65 (1948).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan D. Iversen
    • 1
  • Mortimer Mishkin
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychological Laboratory University of CambridgeCambridgeEngland
  2. 2.Dept. of Health Education and WelfareNational Institute of Mental HealthUSA

Personalised recommendations