Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 173–185

Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons

  • B. J. Frost
  • P. L. Scilley
  • S. C. P. Wong
Article
  • 76 Downloads

Summary

The experiments reported in this paper were carried out to determine the effect moving background patterns have on the response characteristics of directionally specific neurons in the pigeon optic tectum. First, care was taken to select the optimal single stimulus for each cell, then large textured patterns were added to the test stimulus and moved either ‘in-phase’ or ‘anti-phase’. Altogether 214 cells were studied in 77 white Carneaux pigeons and it was found that all cells below a depth of 400 microns were inhibited by backgrounds moved ‘in-phase’ with the optimal test stimulus, while few cells above this level were affected in any way by backgrounds. All directions of background motion containing an ‘in-phase’ vector resulted in rather profound inhibition of the directional response while directions with an ‘anti-phase’ vector produced less inhibition and sometimes were even facilitated by direct ‘anti-phase’. The velocity tuning curves obtained with an optimal single test stimulus and by ‘anti-phase’ movement of backgrounds were essentially similar.

‘In-phase’ inhibition can also be produced by a second spot stimulus located some distance from the test stimulus. This latter effect was used to map the outer margins of the inhibitory receptive fields of deep tectal neurons displaying these effects and it was found they were extremely large, often in excess of 100 ° in diameter. When masks were used to prevent the moving background from stimulating the excitatory receptive field, ‘anti-phase’ movement always produced facilitation. This suggests a double opponent-process directionally specific receptive field organization.

These neurons seem well suited to respond to local (object) motion and to ignore translation of the visual image arising from body, head and eye movements.

Key words

Tectum Pigeon Directionally specific cells-background movement Opponent processes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow HB, Derrington AM, Harris LR, Lennie P (1977) The effect of remote retinal stimulation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol (Lond) 269: 177Google Scholar
  2. Barlow HB, Levick WR (1965) The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbits retina. J Physiol (Lond) 178: 447–504Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore C, Tobin E (1972) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 15: 439–440Google Scholar
  4. Bourdon B (1902) La perception visuelle de l'espace. Reinwald, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridgeman B (1972) Visual receptive fields sensitive to absolute and relative motion during tracking. Science 178: 1106–1108Google Scholar
  6. Brown JF (1931) The visual perception of velocity. Psychol Forsch 14: 199–232Google Scholar
  7. Burns BD, Gassanov U, Webb AC (1972) Responses of neurons in the cat's visual cerebral cortex to relative movement of patterns. J Physiol (Lond) 226: 133–151Google Scholar
  8. Burns S, Wallman J (1979) Neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root (accessory optic system) of birds respond preferentially to vertical stimulus movement. Neurosci Abstr 5: 779Google Scholar
  9. Cleland BG, Dubin MW, Levick WR (1971) Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol (Lond) 217: 473–496Google Scholar
  10. Cowan W, Powell T (1962) Centrifugal fibers to the retina in the pigeon. Nature 194: 487–488Google Scholar
  11. Derrington AM, Fuchs AF (1978) Spatial and temporal frequency tuning in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol (Lond) 282: 45PGoogle Scholar
  12. Dichgans J, Brandt T (1972) Visual-vestibular interactions and motion perception. In: Dichgans J, Bizzi E (eds) Cerebral control of eye movements and motion perception. Karger, Basel New York, pp 327–338Google Scholar
  13. Duncker K (1929) Über induzierte Bewegung. Psychol Forsch 12: 180–259Google Scholar
  14. Fischer B, Barth R, Sternheim CE (1978) Interaction of receptive field responses and shift effect in cat retinal and geniculate neurons. Exp Brain Res 31: 235–248Google Scholar
  15. Fischer B, Kruger J (1974) The shift effect in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Exp Brain Res 21: 225–227Google Scholar
  16. Fries W, Albus K, Creutzfeldt OD (1977) Effects of interacting visual patterns on single cell responses in cat's striate cortex. Vision Res 17: 1001–1008Google Scholar
  17. Frost BJ (1978) Moving background patterns alter directionally specific responses of pigeon tectal neurons. Brain Res 151: 599–603Google Scholar
  18. Frost BJ, DiFranco DE (1976) Motion specific units in the pigeon optic tectum. Vision Res 16: 1229–1234Google Scholar
  19. Frost BJ, Wong SCP (1977) The effect of relative motion on directionally specific pigeon tectal units. Neurosci Abstr 3: 560Google Scholar
  20. Frost BJ, Wong SCP, Brooks PL (1978) Surround antagonism and opponent processes in directionally specific pigeon tectal units. Neurosci Abstr 4: 627Google Scholar
  21. Goldberg ME, Wurtz RH (1972a) Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. I. Visual receptive field of single neurons. J Neurophysiol 35: 542–559Google Scholar
  22. Goldberg ME, Wurtz RH (1972b) Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. II. The effect of attention on neuronal responses. J Neurophysiol 35: 560–574Google Scholar
  23. Grusser OJ, Grusser-Cornehls U (1973) Neuronal mechanisms of visual movement perception and some psychophysical and behavioral connections. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Central visual systems A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (vol 7, chapter 6), pp 334–429Google Scholar
  24. Hammond P, MacKay DM (1975) Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli. Exp Brain Res 22: 427–430Google Scholar
  25. Hammond P, MacKay DM (1978) Modulation of simple cell activity in cat by moving textured backgrounds. J Physiol (Lond) 284: 117Google Scholar
  26. Harris LP (1980) The superior colliculus and movements of the head and eyes in cat. J Neurophysiol 300: 367–391Google Scholar
  27. Hess WR, Burgi S, Bucher V (1946) Motorische Funktion des Tektal- und Tegmantalgebietes. Monatschr Psychiatr Neurol 112: 1–52Google Scholar
  28. Ikeda H, Wright MJ (1972) Differential effects of defocussed images on the receptive field of central and peripheral retinal ganglion cell. J Physiol (Lond) 223: 14PGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuffler SW (1953) Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 28: 37–68Google Scholar
  30. Levick W, Oyster C, Davis D (1965) Evidence that Mcllwain's periphery effect is not a stray light artifact. J Neurophysiol 28: 555–559Google Scholar
  31. Maffei L, Fiorentini A (1976) The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields. Vision Res 75: 1131–1139Google Scholar
  32. Mandl G (1974) The influence of visual pattern combinations on responses of movement sensitive cells in the cat's superior colliculus. Brain Res 75: 215–240Google Scholar
  33. Mason R (1979) Responsiveness of cells in the cat's superior colliculus to textured visual stimuli. Exp Brain Res 37: 231–240Google Scholar
  34. McIlwain JT (1964) Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: peripheral extent and barbituate sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 27: 1154–1173Google Scholar
  35. McIlwain JT (1966) Some evidence concerning the physiological basis of the periphery effect in the cat's retina. Exp Brain Res 1: 265–271Google Scholar
  36. Michael CR (1966) Receptive fields of directionally selective units in the optic nerve of ground squirrel. Science 152: 1092–1094Google Scholar
  37. Michael CR (1968) Receptive fields of single optic nerve fibers in a mammal with an all-cone retina. II. Directionally selective units. J Neurophysiol 31: 257–261Google Scholar
  38. Michael CR (1972) Functional organization of cells in superior colliculus of the ground squirrel. J Neurophysiol 35: 833Google Scholar
  39. Morgan B, Frost BJ (1979) Single unit and behavioral assessment of ectomamillary nucleus function. Neurosci Abstr 5: 799Google Scholar
  40. Nelson JI, Frost BJ (1976) The neural mechanism of orientation contrast. Neurosci Abstr 2: 1083Google Scholar
  41. Nelson JI, Frost BJ (1978) Orientation selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field. Brain Res 139: 359–365Google Scholar
  42. Rizzolatti G, Camarda R (1975) Inhibition of visual responses of single units in the cat visual area of the lateral suprasylvian gyrus by introduction of a second visual stimulus. Brain Res 88: 357–361Google Scholar
  43. Rizzolatti G, Camarda R (1977) Influence of the presentation of remote visual stimuli on visual responses of cat area 17 and lateral suprasylvian area. Exp Brain Res 29: 107–122Google Scholar
  44. Rizzolati G, Camarda R, Grupp LA, Pisa M (1973) Inhibition of visual responses of single units in the cat superior colliculus by the introduction of a second visual stimulus. Brain Res 61: 390–394Google Scholar
  45. Rizzolati G, Camarda R, Grupp LA, Pisa M (1974) Inhibitory effect of remote visual stimuli on the visual responses of the cat superior colliculus: Spatial and temporal factors. J Neurophysiol 37: 1262–1275Google Scholar
  46. Robinson DA (1972) On the nature of visual oculomotor connections. Invest Ophthalmol 11: 487–503Google Scholar
  47. Schaefer KP (1967) Neuronale Entladungsmuster in Tectum opticum des Kaninchens bei passiven und aktiven Eigenbewegungen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 209: 101–125Google Scholar
  48. Schaefer KP, Schneider H (1969) Stimulation experiments and neurone correlations in optic tectum. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 26: 433–434Google Scholar
  49. Schiller P, Koerner F (1971) Discharge characteristics of single units in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 34: 920–936Google Scholar
  50. Simpson JI, Soodak RE, Hess R (1979) The accessory optic system and its relation to the vestibulocerebellum. In: Granit R, Pompeiano O (eds) Reflex control of posture and movement. Progress in brain research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (vol 50, pp 715–724)Google Scholar
  51. Skultety FM (1962) Circus movements in cats following midbrain stimulation through chronically implanted electrodes. J Neurophysiol 25: 152–164Google Scholar
  52. Sterling P, Wickelgren B (1969) Visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 32: 1–15Google Scholar
  53. Straschill M, Hoffman KP (1970) Activity of movement sensitive neurons of the cat's tectum opticum during spontaneous eye movements. Exp Brain Res 11: 318–326Google Scholar
  54. Wallach H (1959) The perception of motion. Sci Am 201: 310–314Google Scholar
  55. Wong SCP, Frost BJ (1978) Subjective motion and acceleration induced by the movement of the observer's entire visual field. Percept Psychophys 24: 115–120Google Scholar
  56. Woods EJ, Frost BJ (1977) Adaptation and habituation characteristics of tectal neurons in the pigeon. Exp Brain Res 27: 347–354Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Frost
    • 1
  • P. L. Scilley
    • 1
  • S. C. P. Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations