Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 185–196

Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings

  • H. Collewijn
  • J. Van der Steen
  • L. Ferman
  • T. C. Jansen


Static and dynamic components of ocular counterroll as well as cyclorotatory optokinetic nystagmus were measured with a scleral search coil technique. Static counterroll compensated for about 10% of head roll when the head was tilted to steady positions up to 20 deg from the upright position. The dynamic component of counterroll, which occurs only while the head is moving, is much larger. It consists of smooth compensatory cyclorotation opposite to the head rotation, interrupted frequently by saccades moving in the same direction as the head. During voluntary sinusoidal head roll, cyclorotation compensated from 40% to more than 70% of the head motion. In the range 0.16 to 1.33 Hz, gain increased with frequency and with the amount of visual information. The lowest values were found in darkness. The gain increased in the presence of a visual fixation point and a further rise was induced by a structured visual pattern. Resetting saccades were made more frequently in the dark than in the light. These saccades were somewhat slower than typical horizontal saccades. Cyclorotatory optokinetic nystagmus could be induced by a patterned disk rotating around the visual axis. It was highly variable even within a same subject and had in general a very low gain (mean value about 0.03 for stimulus velocities up to 30 deg/s). It is concluded that cyclorotational slip velocity on the retina is considerably reduced by counterroll during roll of the head, although the residual cyclorotation after the head has reached a steady position is very small.

Key words

Eye movements Counterroll Cyclorotation Torsion Scleral coil technique 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bahill AT, Brockenbrough A, Troost BT (1981) Variability and development of a normative data base for saccadic eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21: 116–125Google Scholar
  2. Balliet R, Nakayama K (1978) Training of voluntary torsion. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 17: 303–314Google Scholar
  3. Baloh RW, Sills AW, Kumley WE, Honrubia V (1975) Quantitative measurement of saccade amplitude, duration, and velocity. Neurology 25: 1065–1070Google Scholar
  4. Boghen D, Troost BT, Daroff RB, Dell'Osso LF, Birkett JE (1974) Velocity characteristics of normal human saccades. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 13: 619–623Google Scholar
  5. Brecher GA (1934) Die optokinetische Auslösung von Augenrol-lung und rotatorischem Nystagmus. Pflügers Arch 234: 13–28Google Scholar
  6. Collewijn H (1977) Eye and head movements in freely moving rabbits. J Physiol (Lond) 266: 471–498Google Scholar
  7. Collewijn H, Noorduin H (1972) Vertical and torsional optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit. Pflügers Arch 332: 87–95Google Scholar
  8. Collewijn H, Van der Steen J, Steinman RM (1985) Human eye movements associated with blinks and prolonged eye-lid closure. J Neurophysiol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Collewijn H, Van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15: 447–450Google Scholar
  10. Crone RA (1975) Optically induced eye torsion. II. Optostatic and optokinetic cycloversion. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthal 196: 1–7Google Scholar
  11. Crone RA, Everhard-Halm Y (1975) Optically induced eye torsion. I. Fusional cyclovergence. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthal 195: 231–239Google Scholar
  12. Davies T, Merton PA (1958) Recording compensatory rolling of the eyes. J Physiol (Lond) 140: 27P-28PGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond SG, Markham CH (1981) Binocular counterrolling in humans with unilateral labyrinthectomy and in normal controls. Ann NY Acad Sci 374: 69–79Google Scholar
  14. Diamond SG, Markham CH (1983) Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function. Neurology 33: 1460–1469Google Scholar
  15. Diamond SG, Markham CH, Simpson NE, Curthoys IS (1979) Binocular counterrolling in humans during dynamic rotation. Acta Otolaryngol 87: 490–498Google Scholar
  16. Diamond SG, Markham CH, Furuya N (1982) Binocular counter-rolling during sustained body tilt in normal humans and in a patient with unilateral vestibular nerve section. Ann Otol 91: 225–229Google Scholar
  17. Fender DH (1955) Torsional motions of the eyeball. Brit J Ophthal 39: 65–72Google Scholar
  18. Fischer MH (1927) Messende Untersuchungen über die Gegenrol-lung der Augen und die Lokalisation der scheinbaren Vertika-len bei seitlicher Neigung (des Kopfes, des Stammes und des Gesamtkörpers). Albrecht v. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthal 118: 633–680Google Scholar
  19. Hatamian M, Anderson DJ (1983) Design considerations for a real-time ocular counterroll instrument. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME 30: 278–288Google Scholar
  20. Howard IP, Templeton WB (1964) Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation. Vision Res 4: 433–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jampel RS (1981) Ocular torsion and the primary retinal meridians. Am J Ophthal 91: 14–24Google Scholar
  22. Kertesz AE, Jones RW (1969) The effect of angular velocity of stimulus on human torsional eye movements. Vision Res 9: 995–998Google Scholar
  23. Kushner BJ, Kraft S (1983) Ocular torsional movements in normal humans. Am J Ophthal 95: 752–762Google Scholar
  24. Lichtenberg BK, Young LR, Arrott AP (1982) Human ocular counterrolling induced by varying linear accelerations. Exp Brain Res 48: 127–136Google Scholar
  25. Merker BH, Held R (1981) Eye torsion and the apparent horizon under head tilt and visual field rotation. Vision Res 21: 543–547Google Scholar
  26. Merton PA (1956) Compensatory rolling movements of the eye. J Physiol (Lond) 132: 25P-27PGoogle Scholar
  27. Merton PA (1959) Compensatory rolling movements of the eyes. Proc R Soc Med 52: 184–185Google Scholar
  28. Miller EF (1962) Counterrolling of the human eyes produced by head tilt with respect to gravity. Acta Otolaryngol 54: 480–501Google Scholar
  29. Miller EF, Graybiel A (1971) Effect of gravitoinertial force on ocular counterrolling. J Appl Physiol 31: 697–700Google Scholar
  30. Mulder ME (1875) Über parallele Rollbewegungen der Augen. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthal 21: 68–124Google Scholar
  31. Nagel WA (1896) Über kompensatorische Raddrehungen der Augen. Z Physiol Psychol Sinnesorg 12: 331–354Google Scholar
  32. Nelson JR, Cope D (1971) The otoliths and the ocular counter-torsion reflex. Arch Otolaryngol 94: 40–50Google Scholar
  33. Petrov AP, Zenkin GM (1973) Torsional eye movements and constancy of the visual field. Vision Res 13: 2465–2477Google Scholar
  34. Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Electron BME-10: 137–145Google Scholar
  35. Sullivan MJ, Kertesz AE (1978) Binocular coordination of torsional eye movements in cyclofusional response. Vision Res 18: 943–949Google Scholar
  36. Van der Steen J, Collewijn H (1984) Ocular stability in the horizontal, frontal and sagittal planes in the rabbit. Exp Brain Res 56: 263–274Google Scholar
  37. Woellner R, Graybiel A (1959) Counterrolling of the eyes and its dependence on the magnitude of the gravitational or inertial force acting laterally on the body. J Appl Physiol 14: 632–634Google Scholar
  38. Young LR, Lichtenberg BK, Arrott AP, Crites TA, Oman CM, Edelman ER (1981) Ocular torsion on earth and in weightlessness. Ann NY Acad Sci 374: 80–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Collewijn
    • 1
  • J. Van der Steen
    • 1
  • L. Ferman
    • 1
  • T. C. Jansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology I, Faculty of MedicineErasmus University RotterdamDR RotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations