Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 213–228 | Cite as

Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey

  • B. M. Dow
  • A. Z. Snyder
  • R. G. Vautin
  • R. Bauer
Article

Summary

Receptive field size and magnification have been studied in striate cortex of awake, behaving rhesus monkeys at visual eccentricities in the range of 5–160 min. The major findings that emerge are (1) magnification in the foveola achieves values in the range of 30 mm/deg, (2) mean field size is not proportional to inverse magnification in contrast with previous reports, and (3) the product, magnification X aggregate field size, is greater in central vision than in peripheral vision. Thus, a point of light projected onto foveal retina is “seen” by larger numbers of striate cortical cells than a point of light projected onto peripheral retina.

Implications of these findings for visual localization and two-point discrimination are discussed.

Key words

Striate cortex Monkey Magnification Fovea Receptive field Visual acuity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow HG, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD (1967) The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 193: 327–342Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett JR, Doty RW (1980) An exploration of the ability of macaques to detect microstimulation of striate cortex. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Warsz) 40: 713–728Google Scholar
  3. Bauer R, Dow BM, Vautin RG (1980) Laminar distribution of preferred orientations in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 41: 54–60Google Scholar
  4. Bond HW, Ho P (1970) Solid miniature silver chloride electrode for chronic implantation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 28: 206–208Google Scholar
  5. Campbell FW, Green DG (1965) Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol (Lond) 181: 576–593Google Scholar
  6. Campbell FW, Gubisch RW (1968) Optical quality of the human eye. J Physiol (Lond) 186: 558–578Google Scholar
  7. Chan-Palay V, Palay SL, Billings-Gagliardi SM (1974) Meynert cells in the primate visual cortex. J Neurocytol 3: 631–658Google Scholar
  8. Daniel PM, Whitteridge D (1961) The representation of the visual field in the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol (Lond) 159: 302–321Google Scholar
  9. Evarts EV (1966) Methods for recording activity of individual neurons in moving animals. In: Rushmer RF (ed) Methods in medical research, vol 11. Year Book, Chicago, pp 241–250Google Scholar
  10. Fischer B (1973) Overlap of receptive field centers and representation of the visual field in the cat's optic tract. Vision Res 13: 2113–2120Google Scholar
  11. Grether WF (1941) A comparison of visual acuity in the rhesus monkey and man. J Comp Physiol Psychol 31: 23–33Google Scholar
  12. Guld C, Bertulis A (1976) Representation of fovea in the striate cortex of vervet monkey, cercopithecus aethiops pygerythrus. Vision Res 16: 629–631Google Scholar
  13. Hubel DH, Freeman DC (1977) Projection into the visual field of ocular dominance columns in macaque monkey. Brain Res 122: 336–343Google Scholar
  14. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974) Uniformity of monkey striate cortex. A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. J Comp Neurol 158: 295–306Google Scholar
  15. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1977) Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 198: 1–59Google Scholar
  16. LeGrand Y (1967) Form and space vision (translated by Millodot M, Heath GG) Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. LeGros Clark WE (1942) The cells of Meynert in the visual cortex of the monkey. J Anat 76: 369–376Google Scholar
  18. McIlwain JT (1976) Large receptive fields and spatial transformations in the visual system. Int Rev Physiol 10: 223–248Google Scholar
  19. O'Kusky J, Colonnier M (1980) The number of neurons, glial cells and synapses in the striate cortex of macaque monkey. A stereological analysis. Neurosci Abstr 6: 578Google Scholar
  20. Poggio GF, Fischer B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. Neurophysiol 40: 1392–1405Google Scholar
  21. Poggio GF, Doty RW, Jr, Talbot WH (1977) Foveal striate cortex of behaving monkey: single neuron responses to square-wave gratings during fixation of gaze. J Neurophysiol 40: 1369–1391Google Scholar
  22. Polyak S (1957) The vertebrate visual system. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Rockel AJ, Hiorns RW, Powell TPS (1980) The basic uniformity in structure of the neocortex. Brain 103: 221–244Google Scholar
  24. Rolls ET, Cowey A (1970) Topography of the retina and striate cortex and its relationship to visual acuity in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res 10: 298–310Google Scholar
  25. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976) Quantitative studies of single cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 39: 1288–1319Google Scholar
  26. Steinman RM, Haddad GM, Skavenski AA, Wyman D (1973) Miniature eye movement. Science 181: 810–819Google Scholar
  27. Talbot SA, Marshall WH (1941) Physiological studies on neural mechanisms of visual localization and discrimination. Am J Ophthalmol 24: 1255–1263Google Scholar
  28. Wertheim T (1894) Über die indirekte Sehschärfe. Z Psychol Physiol Sinnesorg 7: 172–189Google Scholar
  29. Westheimer G (1979) The spatial sense of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 893–912Google Scholar
  30. Weymouth FW, Hines DC, Acres LH, Raaf JE, Wheeler MC (1928) Visual acuity within the area centralis and its relation to eye movements and fixation. Am J Ophthalmol 11: 947–960Google Scholar
  31. Wurtz RH (1969) Visual receptive fields of striate cortex neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 32: 727–742Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. M. Dow
    • 1
  • A. Z. Snyder
    • 1
  • R. G. Vautin
    • 1
  • R. Bauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Neurobiology, Department of PhysiologySchool of Medicine, State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations