Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 447–454 | Cite as

Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity

  • A. Cowey
  • E. T. Rolls


The magnification factor (M) of the retina is the linear extent of visual striate cortex to which each degree of the retina projects. It has been suggested that magnification factor is directly proportional to visual acuity, but magnification factor measured in monkeys was compared with visual acuity in man. Here we first describe calculation of the magnification factor in man, and then compare it to human visual acuity.

We calculated M for the first 30 degrees of the lower visual field by using infor mation provided by Brindley and Lewin (1968), who plotted the distribution of phosphenes evoked by stimulation of visual cortex in a human patient with electrodes implanted on the visual cortex. Since the inter-electrode distance was specified it was possible to calculate M for each of many pairs of electrodes by measuring the angular separation and mean eccentricity of the corresponding pairs of phosphenes. For the lower visual field, M was approximately 4 mm/degree at 2 degrees eccentricity and declined monotonically to 0.5 mm/degree at 25 degrees eccentricity.

The results indicated that the reciprocal of M is directly proportional to the minimum angle of resolution and, correspondingly, that the magnification factor is directly proportional to visual acuity in man.

By extrapolating this function for the whole of the visual field it was possible to estimate the area of striate cortex. The total extent of striate cortex estimated in this way agreed closely with previous direct measurements, suggesting that the measurements of M are accurate.

Key words

Visual acuity Visual cortex Magnification factor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brindley, G.S., Donaldson, P.E.K., Falconer, M.A., Rushton, D.N.: The extent of the region of the occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 225, 57–58 (1972)Google Scholar
  2. Brindley, G.S., Lewin, W.S.: The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 196, 479–493 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. Cowey, A.: Projection of the retina onto striate and prestriate cortex in the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. J. Neurophysiol. 27, 366–393 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Cowey, A., Rolls, E.T.: Cortical magnification factor in man and its relation to visual acuity. Brain Res. (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Cragg, B. G., Ainsworth, A.: The topography of the afferent projections in circumstriate visual cortex of the monkey studied by the Nauta method. Vision Res. 9, 733–747 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Daniel, P. M., Whitteridge, D.: The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 159, 203–221 (1961)Google Scholar
  7. Filimonoff, I.N.: Über die Variabilität der Grosshirnrindenstruktur. II. Regio occipitalis beim erwachsenen Menschen. J. Psychol. Neurol. (Lpz.) 44, 1–96 (1932)Google Scholar
  8. Holmes, G.: Disturbances of vision by cerebral lesions. Brit. J. Ophthal. 2, 353–384 (1918)Google Scholar
  9. Polyak, S.: The vertebrate visual system. University of Chicago Press 1957Google Scholar
  10. Rolls, E.T., Cowey, A.: Topography of the retina and striate cortex and its relationship to visual acuity in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 10, 298–310 (1970)Google Scholar
  11. Sholl, D.A.: The organization of the cerebral cortex. London: Methuen 1956Google Scholar
  12. Wertheim, T.: Über die indirekte Sehschärfe. Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorg. 7, 172–189 (1894)Google Scholar
  13. Weymouth, F.W.: Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. Amer. J. Ophthal. 46, 102–113 (1958)Google Scholar
  14. Zeki, S.M.: Representation of central visual field in prestriate cortex of monkey. Brain Res. 14, 271–291 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cowey
    • 1
  • E. T. Rolls
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations