Transgenic papaya plants from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos
- 197 Downloads
- 21 Citations
Summary
Transgenic papaya (Carica papaya L.) plants were regenerated from embryogenic cultures that were cocultivated with a disarmed C58 strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens containing one of the following binary cosmid vectors: pGA482GG or pGA482GG/cpPRV-4. The T-DNA region of both binary vectors includes the chimeric genes for neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII) and ß-glucuronidase (GUS). In addition, the plant expressible coat protein (cp) gene of papaya ringspot virus (PRV) is flanked by the NPTII and GUS genes in pGA482GG/cpPRV-4. Putative transformed embryogenic papaya tissues were obtained by selection on 150 μg·ml−1 kanamycin. Four putative transgenic plant lines were obtained from the cp gene− vector and two from the cp gene+ vector. GUS and NPTII expression were detected in leaves of all putative transformed plants tested, while PRV coat protein expression was detected in leaves of the PRV cp gene+ plant. The transformed status of these papaya plants was analyzed using both polymerase chain reaction amplification and genomic blot hybridization of the NPTII and PRV cp genes. Integration of these genes into the papaya genome was demonstrated by genomic blot hybridizations. Thus, like numerous other dicotyledonous plant species, papayas can be transformed with A. tumefaciens and regenerated into phenotypically normal-appearing plants that express foreign genes.
Keywords
Somatic Embryo Coat Protein Embryogenic Culture Putative Transgenic Plant Carica PapayaPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- An G (1986) Plant Physiol 81:86–91Google Scholar
- Chee PP (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9:245–248Google Scholar
- Chee PP, Fober KA, Slightom JL (1989) Plant Physiol 91:1212–1218Google Scholar
- Chee PP, Slightom JL (1991) J Amer Soc Hort Sci 116:1098–1102Google Scholar
- Chee PP, Slightom JL (1992) Gene 118:255–260Google Scholar
- Chen MH, Chen CC, Wang DN, Chen FC (1991) Can J Bot 69:1913–1918Google Scholar
- Christou P, Swain WF, Yang NS, McCabe DE (1989) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 86:7500–7504Google Scholar
- Clark MF, Adams AN (1977) J Gen Virol 34:475–483Google Scholar
- Conover RA (1976) Proc Fla State Hort Soc 89:229–231Google Scholar
- Cook AA, Zettler FW (1970) Plant Dis Rep 54:893–894Google Scholar
- Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983) Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19–21Google Scholar
- Feinburg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) Analyt Biochem 132:6–13Google Scholar
- Fitch MMM (1993) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult, in pressGoogle Scholar
- Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9:320–324Google Scholar
- Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1990) Plant Cell Rep 9:189–194Google Scholar
- Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1992) Bio/Technology 10:1466–1472Google Scholar
- Gordon-Kamm WR, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O'Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR, Willetts NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) The Plant Cell 2:603–618Google Scholar
- Grumet R (1990) HortScience 25:508–513Google Scholar
- Hepburn AP, White J, Pearson L, Maunders MJ, Clarke LE, Prescott AG, Blundy KS (1985) J Gen Microbiol 131:2961–2969Google Scholar
- Hookyaas PJJ (1988) Plant Molecular Biology Manual A4: 1–13. Kluwer Publishers, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Horovitz S, Jimenez H (1967) Agron Trop 17:323–343Google Scholar
- Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:387–405Google Scholar
- Jefferson RA, Burgess SM, Hirsh D (1986) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 83:8447–8451Google Scholar
- Khuspe SS, Hendre RR, Mascarenhas AF, Jaganathan V, Thombre MV, Joshi AB (1980) In National symposium on plant tissue culture, genetic manipulation, and somatic hybridization of plant cells. PS Rao, MR Heble, MS Chadha, Eds. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay, pp 198–205Google Scholar
- Ling K, Namba S, Gonsalves C, Slightom JL, Gonsalves D (1991) Bio/ Technology 9:752–758Google Scholar
- Manshardt RM, Wenslaff TF (1989b) J Amer Soc Hort Sci 114:689–694Google Scholar
- McCabe DE, Swain WF, Martinell BJ, Christou P (1988) Bio/Technology 6:923–926Google Scholar
- McGranahan GH, Leslie CA, Uratsu SL, Martin LA, Dandekar AM (1988) Bio/Technology 6:800–804Google Scholar
- Moore GA, Litz RE (1984) J Amer Soc Hort Sci 109:213–218Google Scholar
- Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
- Pang SZ, Sanford JC (1988) J Amer Soc Hort Sci 113:287–291Google Scholar
- Powell Abel P, Nelson RS, De B, Hoffman N, Rogers SG, Fraley RT, Beachy RN (1986) Science 232:738–743Google Scholar
- Quemada H, L'Hostis B, Gonsalves D, Reardon IM, Heinrikson R, Hiebert EL, Sieu LC, Slightom JL (1990) J Gen Virol 70:203–210Google Scholar
- Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA (1988) Science 239:487–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slightom JL (1991) Gene 100:251–255Google Scholar
- Slightom JL, Drong RF, Sieu LC, Chee PP (1991) Plant Molecular Biology Manual B16:1–55. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Storey WB (1953) J Hered 44:70–78Google Scholar
- Yeh, S.-D. and Gonsalves, D. (1984) Phytopathology 74:1086–1091Google Scholar