Advertisement

Polar Biology

, Volume 12, Issue 6–7, pp 653–657 | Cite as

Aspects of the biology of the midge, Eretmoptera murphyi Schaeffer (Diptera: Chironomidae), introduced to Signy Island, maritime Antarctic

  • Peter Convey
Article

Summary

The biology of a population of the subantarctic chironomid midge Eretmoptera murphyi Schaeffer, introduced to Signy Island in the maritime Antarctic more than 20 years ago, is described. Investment in reproduction by the parthenogenetic adult females is high, with individuals producing single egg batches containing ca. 85 eggs and having a dry weight of more than twice that of the spent female. In culture, egg development rates to hatching are increased significantly by increasing temperature from 2° to 12°C (a range covering mean summer temperatures found in the species' maritime Antarctic habitat, and natural habitat in the subantarctic). The gelatinous matrix of the egg batch forms a skin on drying, which may reduce further water loss, and allow the eggs or pre-emergence larvae to survive the short periods of desiccating conditions likely to occur in their natural habitat. The biology of E. murphyi is compared with that of the endemic maritime Antarctic species Belgica antarctica, showing much similarity. E. murphyi possesses several preadaptations which allow it to survive the harsher conditions of the maritime Antarctic.

Keywords

Water Loss Adult Female Development Rate Natural Habitat Summer Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baust JG (1980) Low temperature tolerance in an Antarctic insect: a relict adaptation? Cryo-Lett 1:360–371Google Scholar
  2. Baust JG, Lee RE Jr (1987) Multiple stress tolerance in an antarctic terrestrial arthropod: Belgica antarctica. Cryobiology 24:140–147Google Scholar
  3. Block W, Burn AJ, Richard KJ (1984) An insect introduction to the maritime Antarctic. Biol J Linn Soc 23:33–39Google Scholar
  4. Brundin L (1970) Diptera: Chironomidae of South Georgia. Pac Insects Monogr 23:276Google Scholar
  5. Burn AJ (1982) A cautionary tale — two recent introductions to the maritime Antarctic. Com Nat Franc Rech Antarct 51:521Google Scholar
  6. Cranston PS (1985) Eretmoptera murphyi Schaeffer (Diptera: Chironomidae), an apparently parthenogenetic Antarctic midge. Br Antarct Surv Bull 66:35–45Google Scholar
  7. Edwards JA (1980) An experimental introduction of vascular plants from South Georgia to the maritime Antarctic. Br Antarct Surv Bull 49:73–80Google Scholar
  8. Edwards JA, Greene DM (1973) The survival of Falkland Island transplants at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Br Antarct Surv Bull 33 & 34:33–45Google Scholar
  9. Edwards JS, Baust J (1981) Sex ratio and adult behaviour of the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica (Diptera, Chironomidae). Ecol Entomol 6:239–243Google Scholar
  10. Edwards M, Usher MB (1985) The winged Antarctic midge Parochlus steinenii (Gerke) (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the South Shetland Islands. Biol J Linn Soc 26:83–93Google Scholar
  11. Goddard DG (1979) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites. XI. Population studies on the Acari. Br Antarct Surv Bull 48:71–92Google Scholar
  12. Harrisson PM, Block W (1988) Survival of freezing in a midge introduced to the Antarctic. Cryo-Lett 9:433Google Scholar
  13. Harrisson PM, Rothery P, Block W (1991) Drying processes in the Antarctic collembolan Cryptopygus antarcticus (Willem). J Insect Physiol 37:883–890Google Scholar
  14. Heilbronn TD, Walton DWH (1984) The morphology of some periglacial features on South Georgia and their relationship to local environment. Br Antarct Surv Bull 64:21–36Google Scholar
  15. Holdgate MW (1964) Terrestrial ecology in the maritime Antarctic. In: Carrick R (ed) Antarctic biology. Hermann, Paris, pp 181–194Google Scholar
  16. Lewis Smith RI (1990) Signy Island as a paradigm of biological and environmental change in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 32–50Google Scholar
  17. Lindberg G (1971) Parthenogenetic strains and unbalanced sex ratios in Tanytarsini (Diptera, Chironomidae). Ann Zool Fenn 8:310–317Google Scholar
  18. McCabe WL, Smith JC (1976) Drying of solids. In: Unit operations of chemical engineering, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith J (1984) The ecology of sex. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Black well, Oxford, pp 201–221Google Scholar
  20. Peckham V (1971) Notes on the chironomid midge Belgica antarctica Jacobs at Anvers Island in the maritime Antarctic. Pac Insects Monogr 25:145–166Google Scholar
  21. Pickup J (1990) Strategies of cold-hardiness in three species of Antarctic dorylaimid nematodes. J Comp Physiol [B] 160:167–173Google Scholar
  22. Rees M, Crawley MJ (1989) Growth, reproduction and population dynamics. Funct Ecol 3:645–653Google Scholar
  23. Ring RA, Block W, Sømme L, Worland MR (1990) Body water content and desiccation resistance in some arthropods from subantarctic South Georgia. Polar Biol 10:581–588Google Scholar
  24. Schaeffer C (1914) Collembola, Siphonaptera, Diptera and Coleoptera of the South Georgia Expedition. Brooklyn Inst Mus Sci Bull 2:90–94Google Scholar
  25. Sugg P, Edwards JS, Baust J (1983) Phenology and life history of Belgica antarctica, an Antarctic midge (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ecol Entomol 8:105–113Google Scholar
  26. Usher MB, Edwards M (1984) A dipteran from south of the Antarctic Circle: Belgica antarctica (Chironomidae), with a description of its larvae. Biol J Linn Soc 23:19–31Google Scholar
  27. Walton DWH (1982) The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites. XV. Micro-climate monitoring, 1972–74. Br Antarct Surv Bull 55:111–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Convey
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNatural Environment Research CouncilCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations