Effects of velocity of isokinetic training on strength, power, and quadriceps muscle fibre characteristics

  • John L. EwingJr.
  • D. Roy Wolfe
  • Marc A. Rogers
  • Mark L. Amundson
  • G. Alan Stull


Twenty young men trained the right knee extensors and flexors on an isokinetic dynamometer three times weekly over a 10-week period. During each session, 10 men in the slow training group completed three sets of 8 maximal contractions at a rate of 1.05 rad s−1, whereas the other 10, the fast group, completed three sets of 20 contractions at a rate of 4.19 rad s−1. Subjects were pre- and post-tested for peak torque and power on an isokinetic dynamometer at 1.05, 3.14, and 4.19 rad s−1. Proportions of muscle fibre-types and fibre cross-sectional areas were determined from biopsy specimens taken before and after training from the right vastus lateralis. When testing was conducted at 1.05 rad s−1, the slow group improved (P<0.05) peak torque by 24.5 N m (8.5%), but no change was noted for the fast group. Power increased (P< 0.05) by 32.7 W (13.6%) in the slow group and 5.5 W (2.5%) in the fast. At 3.14 rad s−1, both groups increased (P<0.05) peak torque and power. At 4.19 rad s−1, the fast group increased (P<0.05) peak torque by 30.0 N m (19.7%), whereas no training effect was observed in the slow group. There was no significant change in power in either group at 4.19 rad s−1, No significant changes were observed over the 10-week training period in percentages of type I, IIa and IIb fibres, but both groups showed significant increases (P<0.05) in type I and IIa fibre areas. No differences were noted between groups, and no hypertrophy of type IIb fibres was observed.

Key words

Hypertrophy Muscle morphology Muscle performance Training velocity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alway SE, Grumbt WH, Gonyea WJ, Stray-Gundersen J (1989a) Contrasts in muscle and myofibers of elite male and female bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 67:24–31Google Scholar
  2. Alway SE, MacDougall JD, Sale DG (1989b) Contractile adaptations in the human triceps surae after isometric exercise. J Appl Physiol 66:2725–2732Google Scholar
  3. Bergstrom J (1962) Muscle electrolytes in man. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 14 [Suppl 68]:1–110Google Scholar
  4. Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WF, Lesmes GR, Witzmann FA (1979) Adaptations in skeletal muscle following strength training. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 46:96–99Google Scholar
  5. Cote C, Simoneau J-A, Lagasse P, Boulay M, Thibault M-C, Marcotte M, Bouchard C (1988) Isokinetic strength training protocols: do they induce skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:281–285Google Scholar
  6. Coyle EF, Feiring DC, Rotkis TC, Cote RW III, Roby FB, Lee W, Wilmore JH (1981) Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 51:1437–1442Google Scholar
  7. deKoning FL, Binkhorst RA, Vos JA, van't Hoff MA (1985) The force-velocity relationship of arm flexion in untrained males and females and arm-trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:89–94Google Scholar
  8. Enoka RM (1988) Muscle strength and its development: new perspectives. Sports Med 6:146–168Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg AL, Etlinger JD, Goldspink DF, Jablecki C (1975) Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports 7:185–198Google Scholar
  10. Gollnick PD, Armstrong RB, Sembrowich WL, Shepherd RE, Saltin B (1973) Glycogen depletion pattern in human skeletal muscle fibers after heavy exercise. J Appl Physiol 34:615–618Google Scholar
  11. Gollnick PD, Karlsson J, Piehl K, Saltin B (1974) Selective glycogen depletion in skeletal muscle fibres of man following sustained contractions. J Physiol (Lond) 241:59–67Google Scholar
  12. Gonyea WJ, Sale D (1982) Physiology of weight-lifting exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:235–237Google Scholar
  13. Gonyea WJ, Sale DG, Gonyea FB, Mikesky A (1986) Exercise induced increases in muscle fiber number. Eur J Appl Physiol 55:137–141Google Scholar
  14. Houston ME, Froese EA, Valeriote StP, Green HJ, Ranney DA (1983) Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur J Appl Physiol 51:25–35Google Scholar
  15. Kanehisa H, Miyashita M (1983) Effect of isometric and isokinetic muscle training on static strength and dynamic power. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:365–371Google Scholar
  16. Lesmes GR, Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WJ (1978) Muscle strength and power changes during maximal isokinetic training. Med Sci Sports 10:266–269Google Scholar
  17. MacDougall JD, Elder GCB, Sale DG, Moroz JR, Sutton JR (1980) Effects of strength training and immobilization on human muscle fibres. Eur J Appl Physiol 43:25–34Google Scholar
  18. Moffroid MT, Whipple RH (1970) Specificity of speed of exercise. Phys Ther 50:1692–1700Google Scholar
  19. Moritani T, deVries HA (1979) Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 58:115–130Google Scholar
  20. Padykula HA, Herman E (1955) The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem 3:170–195Google Scholar
  21. Sale DG (1987) Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation. In: Pandolf KB (ed) Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Macmillan, New York, pp 95–151Google Scholar
  22. Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Alway SE, Sutton JR (1987) Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male body builders. J Appl Physiol 62:1786–1793Google Scholar
  23. Tesch PA (1988) Skeletal muscle adaptations consequent to long-term heavy resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20:S132-S134Google Scholar
  24. Tesch PA, Larsson L (1982) Muscle hypertrophy in bodybuilders. Eur J Appl Physiol 49:301–306Google Scholar
  25. Tesch PA, Thorsson A, Kaiser P (1984) Muscle capillary supply and fiber type characteristics in weight and power lifters. J Appl Physiol 56:35–38Google Scholar
  26. Thorstensson A (1977) Observations on strength training and detraining. Acta Physiol Scand 100:491–493Google Scholar
  27. Thorstensson A, Hulten B, Dobeln W von, Karlsson J (1976a) Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 96:392–398Google Scholar
  28. Thorstensson A, Karlsson J, Viitalso JHT, Luktaner P, Komi PV (1976b) Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 98:232–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. EwingJr.
    • 2
  • D. Roy Wolfe
    • 3
  • Marc A. Rogers
    • 1
  • Mark L. Amundson
    • 2
  • G. Alan Stull
    • 4
  1. 1.The Exercise Physiology Research LaboratoriesMichigan State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.South Dakota State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Texas Tech UniversityUSA
  4. 4.State University of New York at BuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations