Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 347–351 | Cite as

Ocular dominance in kitten cortex: Induced changes of single cells while they are recorded

  • T. Tsumoto
  • R. D. Freeman
Research Note

Summary

We have monitored extracellularly individual neurons in the striate cortex of 4-week-old unparalyzed kittens with the aim of changing the ocular dominance of these cells during recording. To do this, we elicited conjugate eye movements using a bipolar stimulating electrode positioned in the internal medullary lamina (IML) of the thalamus. During electrical stimulation of this region, one eye was occluded and the other was visually activated with optimal stimuli. Receptive fields were studied subjectively and objectively and relative response strengths were assessed. Of 42 cells studied in detail, 62% underwent changes in ocular dominance following conditioning periods of, generally, 15–20 min. Control experiments suggest that this plasticity is: agerelated; requires both visual stimulation and activation of pathways associated with eye movement; and does not appear to be caused solely by increased arousal levels.

Key words

Kitten cortex Visual plasticity Ocular dominance Eye movements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buisseret P, Gary-Bobo E, Imbert M (1978) Ocular motility and recovery of orientational properties of visual cortical neurones in dark-reared kittens. Nature 272: 816–817Google Scholar
  2. Freeman RD, Bonds AB (1979) Cortical plasticity in monocularly deprived immobilized kittens depends on eye movement. Science 206: 1093–1095Google Scholar
  3. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160: 106–154Google Scholar
  4. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1970) The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol (Lond) 206: 419–436Google Scholar
  5. Hughes HC (1980) Efferent organization of the cat pulvinar complex, with a note on bilateral claustrocortical and reticulocortical connections. J Comp Neurol 193: 937–963Google Scholar
  6. Kasamatsu T (1976) A long-lasting change in ocular dominance of kitten striate neurons induced by reversible unilateral blockade of tonic retinal discharges. Exp Brain Res 26: 487–494Google Scholar
  7. Olson CR, Freeman RD (1980) Profile of the sensitive period for monocular deprivation in kittens. Exp Brain Res 39: 17–21Google Scholar
  8. Pettigrew JD, Olson C, Barlow HB (1973) Kitten visual cortex. Short-term, stimulus-induced changes in connectivity. Science 180: 1202–1203Google Scholar
  9. Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M (1971) Induction of oculomotor responses from thalamic internal medullary lamina in the cat. Exp Neurol 33: 498–508Google Scholar
  10. Schlag J, Lehtinen I, Schlag-Rey M (1974) Neuronal activity before and during eye movements in thalamic internal medullary lamina of the cat. J Neurophysiol 37: 982–995Google Scholar
  11. Singer W (1979) Central-core control of visual-cortex functions. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG (eds) The neurosciences, 4th Study Programme. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1093–1110Google Scholar
  12. Singer W, Gruenau M von, Rauschecker J (1979) Requirements for the disruption of binocularity in the visual cortex of strabismic kittens. Brain Res 171: 536–540Google Scholar
  13. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH (1963) Single-cell responses in the striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol 26: 1003–1017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Tsumoto
    • 1
  • R. D. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of OptometryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations