Binocular fixation in the rhesus monkey: Spatial and temporal characteristics
- 75 Downloads
- 23 Citations
Summary
The horizontal and vertical components of the positions of both eyes of rhesus monkeys were measured during periods of binocularly stable eye positions (eye pauses) while the animals fixated a small target. Differences between monocular and binocular viewing, as well as effects of target size and background illumination, were assessed and found to be comparable to similar measures for humans. The scatter of eye position for either eye during binocular viewing had a standard deviation of 6–8 min arc in the horizontal and 7–13 min arc in the vertical meridia. Measurements of vergence and vertical misalignment, taken from binocular positional disparity, showed that for nearly 60% of eye pause time the eyes were misaligned on the fixation target by more than 7 min arc along both horizontal and vertical axes. In addition, the line of gaze during the trial was found to follow certain idiosyncratic tendencies for each monkey, although the positional variability remained relatively constant throughout the fixation trial. These observations suggest that during binocular fusion and stereopsis a mechanism exists that dynamically compensates for the relatively large shifts in retinal image position during fixation.
Key words
Eye movements Fixation Monkey VergencePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Barbeito R (1981) Sighting dominance: an explanation based on the processing of visual direction in tests of sighting dominance. Vision Res 21: 855–860Google Scholar
- Ditchburn RW (1973) Eye-movements and visual perception. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fender D, Julesz B (1967) Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. J Opt Soc Am 57: 819–830Google Scholar
- Hyson MP, Julesz B, Fender DH (1980) Vergence eye movements and postulated cortical compensation during the fusion of horizontally misaligned random dot stereograms. In: Recent Advances in Vision, p WB2 Optical Society of America Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Krauskopf J, Cornsweet TN, Riggs LA (1960) Analysis of eye movements during monocular and binocular fixation. J Opt Soc Am 50: 572–578Google Scholar
- Kurtz D, Snodderly M (1980) Fixational eye movements of monkeys. Invest Ophthal Visual Sci 21: 58Google Scholar
- Motter BC, Poggio GF (1982) Spatial invariance of receptive field location in the presence of eye movements of fixation for neurons in monkey striate cortex. Soc Neurosci Abstr 8: 707Google Scholar
- Nachmias J (1960) Meridional variations in visual acuity and eye movements during fixation. J Opt Soc Am 50: 569–571Google Scholar
- Nachmias J (1959) Two-dimensional motion of the retinal image during monocular fixation. J Opt Soc Am 49: 901–908Google Scholar
- Poggio GF (1984) Processing of stereoscopic information in primate visual cortex. In: Edelman GM, Cowan WM, Gall WE (eds) Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Poggio GF, Fischer B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity of striate and prestriate cortical neurons of the behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 40: 1392–1405Google Scholar
- Poggio GF, Talbot WH (1981) Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J Physiol (Lond) 315: 569–592Google Scholar
- Sheedy JE, Fry GA (1979) The perceived direction of the binocular image. Vision Res 19: 201–211Google Scholar
- Skavenski AA, Robinson DA, Steinman RM, Timberlake GT (1975) Miniature eye movements of fixation in rhesus monkey. Vision Res 15: 1269–1273Google Scholar
- Steinman RM (1965) Effect of target size, luminance, and color on monocular fixation. J Opt Soc Am 55: 1158–1165Google Scholar
- St. Cyr GJ, Fender DH (1969) The interplay of drifts and flicks in binocular fixation. Vision Res 9: 245–265Google Scholar
- Wurtz RH (1969) Visual receptive fields of striate cortex neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 32: 727–742Google Scholar