Enhanced GUS gene expression in cereal/grass cell suspensions and immature embryos using the maize uhiquitin-based plasmid pAHC25
- 248 Downloads
- 34 Citations
Abstract
Transient GUS (β-glucuronidase) expression was visualized in cell suspensions of Triticum aestivum, Zea mays, Pennisetum glaucum, Saccharum officinarum, Pennisetum purpureum and Panicum maximum after microprojectile bombardment with pBARGUS and pAHC25 plasmid DNAs. pBARGUS contains the GUS (UidA) gene coding region driven by the Adh1 promoter and the Adh1 intron 1, as well as the BAR gene coding region driven by the CaMV 35S promoter and the Adh1 intron 1. pAHC25 contains the GUS and BAR gene coding regions driven by the maize ubiquitin promoter, first exon and first intron (Ubi1). The effectiveness of the constructs was first compared in cell suspension cultures by counting blue expression units (b.e.u.). The expression of construct pAHC25 ranged from 3 to 50 fold greater than pBARGUS in different species. In addition, the two plasmids were quantitatively compared in Triticum aestivum and Zea mays by using the more sensitive GUS fluorometric assay to determine the amount of methylumbellyferride (MU) produced. There was more than a 30 fold increase in MU production with pAHC25 than with pBARGUS in the wheat suspension, while the maize suspension showed only a 2.5 fold increase with the pAHC25 construct. Transient GUS expression was also visualized in immature embryos of Pennisetum glaucum following bombardment with pBARGUS and pAHC25 DNA. Expression of plasmid pAHC25 was twice as high as pBARGUS. A comparison of two DNA/gold preparation methods, as well as repeated sonications of the DNA/gold mixture, had no effect on the number of b.e.u.
Keywords
Saccharum Immature Embryo Microprojectile Bombardment Pennisetum Glaucum Saccharum OfficinarumPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bowers R, Birch RG (1992) The Plant J 2:409–416Google Scholar
- Callis J, Fromm M, Walbot V (1987) Genes Dev 1:1183–1200Google Scholar
- Christensen AH, Sharrock RA, Quail PH (1992) Plant Mol Biol 18:675–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M (1991) Bio/Technology 9:957–962Google Scholar
- Freeling M (1973) Molec Gen Genet 127:215–227Google Scholar
- Fromm M, Morrish F, Armstrong C, Williams R, Thomas J, Klein TM (1990) Bio/Technology 8:833–839Google Scholar
- Fromm M, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1985) Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 82:5824–5828Google Scholar
- Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WG, O'Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR Jr., Willets NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) The Plant Cell 2:603–618.Google Scholar
- Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT (1987) Plant Cell Rep 6:265–270Google Scholar
- Ho WJ, Vasil IK (1983) Ann Bot 51:719–726Google Scholar
- Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson SB, Vasil IK (1984) J Plant Physiol 123:211–227Google Scholar
- Klein TM, Gradziel T, Fromm ME, Sanford JC (1988) Bio/Technology 6:559–563Google Scholar
- Kyozuka J, Izawa T, Nakajima M, Shimamoto K (1990) Maydica 35:353–357Google Scholar
- Last DI, Brettell RIS, Chamberlain DA, Chaudhury AM, Larkin PJ Marsh EL, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1991) Theor Appl Genet 81:581–588Google Scholar
- Lee BT, Murdoch K, Topping J, Both MTJ de, Wu QS, Karp A, Steele gnS, Symonds C, Kreis M, Jones MGK (1987) In: Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing HJ, Kool AJ, Koornneef M, Krens FA (eds) Progress in Plant Protoplast Research. Proc 7th Int Protoplast Symp, Wageningen, The Netherlands, December 6–11, 1987, pp 343–346Google Scholar
- Lu C, Vasil IK (1981) Ann Bot 47:543–548Google Scholar
- Luehrson KR, Walbot V (1991) Molec Gen Genet 225:81–93Google Scholar
- Maas C, Laufs J, Grant S, Korfhage C, Werr W (1991) Plant Mol Biol 16:199–207Google Scholar
- McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R (1990) The Plant Cell 2:163–171Google Scholar
- Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
- Oard JH, Paige DF, Simmonds JA, Gradziel TM (1990) Plant Physiol 92:334–339Google Scholar
- Paul A-L, Ferl RJ (1991) Maydica 36:129–134Google Scholar
- Redway FA, Vasil V, Vasil IK (1990) Plant Cell Rep 8:714–717Google Scholar
- Reggiardo MI, Arana JL, Orsaria LM, Permingeat HR, Spitteler MA, Vallejos RH (1991) Plant Science 75:237–243Google Scholar
- Russell JA, Mihir KR, Sanford JC (1992) In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28P:97–105Google Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
- Sanford JC, Devit MJ, Russell JA, Smith FD, Harpending PR, Roy MK, Johnston SA (1991) Technique 3:3–16Google Scholar
- Taylor MG, Vasil IK (1991) Plant Cell Rep 10:120–125Google Scholar
- Vasil V, Castillo A, Fromm ME, Vasil IK (1992) Bio/Technology 6:667–672Google Scholar
- Vasil V, Clancy M, Ferl RJ, Vasil IK, Hannah LC (1989) Plant Physiol 91:1575–1579Google Scholar
- Vasil V, Vasil IK (1981) Ann Bot 47:669–678Google Scholar
- Vasil V, Vasil IK (1986) J Plant Physiol 124:399–408Google Scholar
- Zhang W, Wu R (1988) Theor Appl Genet 76:835–840Google Scholar