Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 59–72 | Cite as

Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture

  • L. M. Nashner


Doubt about the role of stretch reflexes in movement and posture control has remained in part because the questions of reflex “usefulness” and the postural “set” have not been adequately considered in the design of experimental paradigms. The intent of this study was to discover the stabilizing role of stretch reflexes acting upon the ankle musculature while human subjects performed stance tasks requiring several different postural “sets”. Task specific differences of reflex function were investigated by experiments in which the role of stretch reflexes to stabilize sway during stance could be altered to be useful, of no use, or inappropriate.

Because the system has available a number of alternate inputs to posture (e.g., vestibular and visual), stretch reflex responses were in themselves not necessary to prevent a loss of balance. Nevertheless, 5 out of 12 subjects in this study used long-latency (120 msec) stretch reflexes to help reduce postural sway. Following an unexpected change in the usefulness of stretch reflexes, the 5 subjects progressively altered reflex gain during the succeeding 3–5 trials. Adaptive changes in gain were always in the sense to reduce sway, and therefore could be attenuating or facilitating the reflex response. Comparing subjects using the reflex with those not doing so, stretch reflex control resulted in less swaying when the task conditions were unchanging. However, the 5 subjects using reflex controls oftentimes swayed more during the first 3–5 trials after a change, when inappropriate responses were elicited.

Four patients with clinically diagnosed cerebellar deficits were studied briefly. Among the stance tasks, their performance was similar to normal in some and significantly poorer in others. Their most significant deficit appeared to be the inability to adapt long-latency reflex gain following changes in the stance task.

The study concludes with a discussion of the role of stretch reflexes within a hierarchy of controls ranging from muscle stiffness up to centrally initiated responses.

Key words

Human posture control Long-latency stretch reflex Adaptation Reflex compensation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allum, J.H.J.: Responses to load disturbances in human shoulder muscles: The hypothesis that one component is a pulse test information signal. Exp. Brain Res. 22, 307–326 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Belen'kii, V.Ye., Gurfinkel, V.E., Pal'tseu, Ye.I.: Elements of control of voluntary movement. Biophysics 12, 154–161 (1967)Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, N.: Coordination and Regulation of Movements. New York: Pergamon Press 1967Google Scholar
  4. Bizzi, E.: The coordination of eye-head movement. Sci. Amer. 231, 100–106 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. Bousso, P., Ishai, G.: A Study of myoelectric signals for arm prosthesis control. Bio-med. Engng. 509–517 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Evarts, E.V., Tanji, J.: Gating of motor cortex reflexes by prior instruction. Brain Res. 71, 479–494 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Gelfand, I.M., Gurfinkel, V.S., Fomin, S.V., Tsetlin, M.L. (eds.): Models of the Structural-Functional Organization of Certain Biological Systems. Cambridge/Mass.: M.I.T. Press 1971Google Scholar
  8. Gottlieb, G.L., Agarwal, G.C.: Filtering of electromyographic signals. Amer. J. phys. Med. 49, 142–146 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. Gottlieb, G.L., Agarwal, G.: The role of the myotatic reflex in the voluntary control of movements. Brain Res. 40, 139–143 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Grillner, S.: The role of muscle stiffness in meeting the changing postural and locomotor requirements for force development by the ankle extensors. Acta physiol. scand. 86, 92–108 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Gurfinkel', V.S., Lipshits, M.I., Popov, K.Ye.: Is the stretch reflex the main mechanism in the system of regulation of the vertical posture of man? Biophysics 19, 744–748 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Hammond, P.H.: An experimental study of servo-action in the human muscular control. Prod. 3rd Int. Conf. Med. Electron. pp. 190–199 (1960)Google Scholar
  13. Hammond, P.H., Merton, P.A., Sutton, G.G.: Nervous gradation of muscular control. Brit. med. Bull. 12, 214–218 (1956)Google Scholar
  14. Herman, R., Cook, T., Cozzens, B., Freedman, W.: Control of postural reactions in man: The initiation of gait. In: Control of Posture and Locomotion (ed. Stein et al.), pp. 363–388. New York: Plenum Press 1973Google Scholar
  15. Kots, Ya.M.: Supraspinal control of spinal centers for antagonist muscles in man. Biophysics 14, 167–172 (1969)Google Scholar
  16. Kots, Ya.M., Zhukov, V.I.: Supraspinal control over segmental centers of antagonist muscles in man. III. Tuning of spinal reciprocal inhibition system during organization preceding voluntary movement. Biophysics 16, 1085–1091 (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Marsden, C.D., Merton, P.A., Morton, H.B.: Servo-action in human voluntary movement. Nature (Lond.) 238, 140–143 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Melvill Jones, G., Watt, D.G.D.: Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 219, 709–727 (1971a)Google Scholar
  19. Melvill Jones, G., Watt, D.G.D.: Muscular control of landing from unexpected falls in man. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 219, 729–737 (1971b)Google Scholar
  20. Nashner, L.M.: A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion. Acta oto-laryng. (Stockh.) 72, 429–436 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Nashner, L.M.: Vestibular posture control model. Kybernetik 10, 106–110 (1972)Google Scholar
  22. Nashner, L.M.: Vestibular and reflex control of normal standing. In: Control of Posture and Locomotion (ed. Stein et al.), pp. 291–308. New York: Plenum Press 1973Google Scholar
  23. Pew, R.W.: Levels of analysis in motor control. Brain Res. 71, 393–400 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Sears, T.A.: The afferent regulation of learnt movements. Brain Res. 71, 465–473 (1974)Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt, E.M., Jost, R.G., Davis, K.K.: Plasticity of cortical cell firing patterns after load changes. Brain Res. 73, 540–544 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Welford, A.T.: On sequencing of action. Brain Res. 71, 381–392 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. M. Nashner
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurological Sciences InstitutePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations