Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 79–96 | Cite as

Restitution of function in the CNS: The pathologic grasp in Macaca mulatta

  • Michael E. Goldberger


The pathologic grasp reflex (“forced grasping”) was used to study restitution of function in monkeys conditioned to grasp and release a stick for food. Cortical lesions (area 6) made it impossible for the animals to relinquish the stick or to avoid grasping an unconditioned (tactile) stimulus. Normal tactile evasion was abolished but returned during recovery, i.e. as forced grasping waned. Pyramidal lesions alone provoked no forced grasping but abolished all tactile reflexes. Seriatim cortical and pyramidal (1 year later) lesions brought back pathological grasping after “total” restitution of normal grasping had occurred, whereas ventrolateral spinal lesions hastened restitution and enhanced tactile evasion. The possible mechanisms underlying restitution are discussed; it is suggested that the abnormal grasp is compensated by enhancement of its opposing reflex, tactile evasion, which is subserved by the pyramid. The fundamental physiological change due to area 6 lesion is a reflex imbalance which endures covertly in spite of behavioral restitution and is exposed once again when tactile evasion is abolished by pyramidotomy. Therefore, during “recovery”, pyramidal function vis a vis tactile evasion was enhanced in response to loss of inhibitory control over tactile and proprioceptive grasp reflex activity. This model is offered as an alternative to “functional reorganization” and “vicarious function”.

Key words

Forced grasping Restitution Pyramidal Extrapyramidal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adie, W.J., Critchley, M.: Forced grasping and groping. Brain 50, 142–170 (1927).Google Scholar
  2. Beck, C.H., Chambers, W.W.: Speed, accuracy and strength of forelimb movement after unilateral pyramidotomy in rhesus monkeys. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 70, 1–22 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. Bernhard, C.G., Bohm, E.: Monosynaptic cortico-spinal activation of forelimb motorneurons in monkeys (macaca mulatta). Acta physiol. scand. 31, 104–122 (1954).Google Scholar
  4. Bonin, G. von, Bailey, P.: The Neocortex of Macaca Mulatta. University of Ill. Press 1947.Google Scholar
  5. Brodal, A.: Experimental Anatomical Studies of the Corticospinal and Cortico-Rubro-Spinal Connections in the cat. Sump. Biol. Hung. 5, 207–217 (1965).Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, W.W., Kozart, D.: Conditioned tactile discrimination of monkey with corticospinal or pyramidal tract lesions. Anat. Rec. 151, 499 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. Denny-Brown, D.: The cerebral Control of Movement. University of Liverpool 1966.Google Scholar
  8. Eccles, J.C., Ito, M., Szenthágothai, J.: Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1967.Google Scholar
  9. Fulton, J.F.: Forced grasping and groping in relation to the syndrome of permotor area: A physiological analysis. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.) 31, 221–235 (1934).Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, G.H., Higgins, D.C.: Motor Stability Stretch Responses and the Cerebellum. In: R. Granit, Ed. Muscular afferents and Motor Control, pp. 121–139. Nobel Symposium I: New York: Wiley 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Goldberger, M.E.: The extrapyramidal systems of the spinal cord: results of combined spinal and cortical lesions in the Macaque. J. comp. Neurol. 124, 161–174 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. —: The extrapyramidal systems of the spinal cord: II. Results of combined pyramidal and extrapyramidal lesions in the macaque. J. comp. Neurol. 135, 1 (1969).Google Scholar
  13. —, Growdon, J.: Cerebellar tremor and ataxia: The role of the cerebral cortex in recovery. Anat. Rec. 163, 190 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, D.C., Horel, J.A.: Sprouting of Optic Tract projections in the Brain Stem of the Rat. J. comp. Neurol. 27, 71–88 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. Growdon, J.H., Chambers, W.W., Liu, C.N.: An experimental Study of Cerebellar Dyskinesia in the Rhesus Monkey. Brain 90, 603–632 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. Hines, M.: The development and regression of reflexes, postures and progression in the young macaque. Contr. Embryol. Carneg. Instn. 30, 154–217 (1942).Google Scholar
  17. Holmquist, B., Lundberg, A.: Differential supraspinal control of synaptic actions evoked by volleys in the flexion reflex afferents in alpha motoneurons. Acta physiol. scand. 54, Suppl. 186, 5–51 (1961).Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, J.H.: On the Anatomical and Physiological Localization of movements in the Brain. Brit. med. J. (1974).Google Scholar
  19. Jacobsen, C.F., Taylor, F.B., Haslerud, G.M.: Restitution of function after cortical injury in monkeys. Amer. J. Physiol. 116, 85–86 (1936).Google Scholar
  20. Kennard, M.A.: Reorganization of motor function in the cerebral cortex of monkeys deprived of motor and premotor areas in infancy. J. Neurophysiol. 1, 477–496 (1938).Google Scholar
  21. Knapp, H.D., Taub, E., Berman, A.J.: Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp. Neurol. 7, 105–315 (1936).Google Scholar
  22. Koenig, H., Grand, R.A., Windle, W.F.: A physiological approach to perfusion — fixation of tissue with formalin. Stain Technol. 20, 13–22 (1945).Google Scholar
  23. Lashley, K.S.: Integrative Functions of the Cerebral Cortex. Physiol. Rev. 13, 1–24 (1933).Google Scholar
  24. Lawrence, D.G., Kuypers, H.G.J.M.: The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 91, 1–14 (1968a).Google Scholar
  25. Llinás, R., Terzuolo, C.A.: Mechanisms of supraspinal actions upon spinal cord activities. Reticular inhibitory mechanisms on alpha-extensor motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 27, 579–591 (1964).Google Scholar
  26. Lundberg, A., Voorhoeve, P.: Effects from the pyramidal tract on spinal reflex arcs. Acta physiol. scand. 56, 201–219 (1962).Google Scholar
  27. McCouch, G.P., Austin, G.M., Liu, C.N., Liu, C.Y.: Sprouting as a cause of spasticity. J. Neurophysiol. 21, 205–216 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Peele, T.L.: Acute and chronic parietal lobe ablations in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 7, 269–286 (1944).Google Scholar
  29. Preston, J.B., Whitlock, D.C.: Precentral facilitation and inhibition of spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 23, 154–170 (1960).Google Scholar
  30. —: Intracellular potentials recorded from motoneurons following precentral gyrus stimulation in primate. J. Neurophysiol. 24, 91–100 (1961).Google Scholar
  31. Raisman, G.: Neuronal Plasticity in the Septal Nuclei of the Adult Rat. Brain Res. 14, 25–48 (1969).Google Scholar
  32. Richter, C.F., Hines, M.: The production of the grasp reflex in adult macaques by experimental frontal lobe lesions. Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis. 13, 211–244 (1934).Google Scholar
  33. Rushworth, G., Denny-Brown, D.: The two components of the grasp reflex after ablation of the frontal cortex in monkeys. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 22, 91–98 (1959).Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, G.E.: Mechanisms of Recovery Following Lesions of Visual Cortex or Superior Collicus in Neonate and Adult Hamsters. Brain Behav. Evol. 3, 295–323 (1970).Google Scholar
  35. Sperry, R.W.: Effect of Crossing Nerves to Antagonistic Limb Muscles in the Monkey. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.) 58, 452–473 (1947).Google Scholar
  36. Taub, E.: Prism Compensation as a Learning Phenomenon: a Phylogenetic Perspective. In: S.J. Freedman, Ed. The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior. Illinois: Dorsey Press 1968.Google Scholar
  37. Tower, S.S.: Pyramidal and extrapyramidal factors in the production of proprioceptive reflex grasping in the monkey. Amer. J. Physiol. 123, 205 (1938).Google Scholar
  38. —: Pyramidal lesion in the monkey. Brain 63, 36–90 (1490).Google Scholar
  39. Wagley, P.F.: A study of spasticity and paralysis. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 77, 218–273 (1945).Google Scholar
  40. Wall, P.D.: The laminar organization of dorsal horn and effects of descending impulses. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 188, 403–423 (1967).Google Scholar
  41. Woolsey, C.N., Settlage, H., Moyer, D.P., Sencer, W., Hamuy, T.P., Travis, A.M.: Patterns of localization in percentral and supplementary motor areas and their relation to the concept of a premotor area. Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis. 30, 238–264 (1952).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Goldberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations