The Journal of Membrane Biology

, Volume 146, Issue 3, pp 327–341 | Cite as

Two types of A-channels in Lymnaea neurons

  • S. I. Alekseev
  • M. C. Ziskin
Articles

Abstract

The gating mechanism of A-channels of Lymnaea neurons and the effect of tetraethylammonium (TEA) on these channels were studied using macroscopic recording techniques. Along with the fast-inactivating A-current (Iaf) described earlier we found a slow-inactivating A-current (Ias) in some neurons of the visceral ganglion. Both currents have revealed similar activation kinetics, but differ in the inactivation kinetics and mechanisms. The inactivation kinetics of Ias were satisfactorily described by a sum of two exponentials with rate constants (τ−1) of 28 s−1 and 4.5 s−1 at V = −20 mV. Intracellular TEA reduced the peak amplitudes of Iaf and Ias and slowed the rate of the fast phase of inactivation of Iaf. This resulted in a crossover of the current traces in the presence and absence of TEA, as though it competes with the binding of the inactivating particle. The mechanism of the fast phase of inactivation of Iaf is similar to that of fast inactivation of the Shaker K+ channels which appears to be due to a ball-and-chain mechanism. The slow phases of inactivation of Iaf and Ias reveal properties characteristic of C-type inactivation shown in Shaker K+ channels. A partially coupled model including three pathways for transition of a channel from the closed to open states accurately reproduces all of the experimental data. It has voltage-independent transitions to the inactivation states indicating that inactivation of A-current is not associated with charge movement through the membrane. The results suggest that Lymnaea A-channels seem to be heteromultimeric.

Key words

Lymnaea neurons A-currents Tetraethylammonium blockade Kinetic model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alekseev, S.I. 1992. Interaction of sulfhydryl reagents with A-type channels of Lymnaea neurons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1110:178–184Google Scholar
  2. Alekseev, S.I., Zaykin, A.V. 1993. Kinetic study of A-type current inactivation in Lymnaea neurons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1148:97–107Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, C.M., Bezanilla, F. 1977. Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments. J. Gen. Physiol. 70:567–590Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, C.M., Binstock, L. 1965. Anomalous rectification in squid giant axon injected with tetraethylammonium chloride. J. Gen. Physiol. 48:859–872Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, C.M., Hille, B. 1972. The inner quaternary ammonium ion receptor in potassium channels of the node of Ranvier. J. Gen. Physiol. 59:388–400Google Scholar
  6. Beam, K.G. 1976. A quantitative description of end-plate currents in the presence of two lidocaine derivatives. J. Physiol. 258:301–322Google Scholar
  7. Bezanilla, F., Armstrong, C.M. 1977. Inactivation of the sodium channel. I. Sodium current experiments. J. Gen. Physiol. 70:549–566Google Scholar
  8. Cahalan, M.D. 1978. Local anesthetic block of sodium channels in normal and pronase-treated squid axons. Biophys. J. 23:285–311Google Scholar
  9. Cahalan, M.D., Almers, W. 1979. Block of sodium conductance and gating current in squid giant axons poisoned with quarternary strychnine. Biophys. J. 27:57–74Google Scholar
  10. Catterall, W.A. 1988. Structure and function of voltage-sensitive ion channels. Science 242:50–61Google Scholar
  11. Choi, K.L., Aldrich, R.W., Yellen, G. 1991. Tetraethylammonium blockade distinguishes two inactivation mechanisms in voltageactivated K+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5092–5095Google Scholar
  12. Choi, K.L., Mossman, C., Aube, J., Yellen, G. 1993. The internal quaternary ammonium receptor site of Shaker potassium channels. Neuron 10:533–541Google Scholar
  13. Christie, M.J., North, R.A., Osborne, P.B., Douglass, J., Adelman, J.P. 1990. Heteropolymeric potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes from cloned subunits. Neuron 4:405–411Google Scholar
  14. Frankenhaeuser, B., Hodgkin, A.L. 1957. The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J. Physiol. 137:218–244Google Scholar
  15. Gilly, W.F., Armstrong, C.M. 1982a. Divalent cations and the activation kinetics of potassium channels in squid giant axons. J. Gen. Physiol. 79:965–996Google Scholar
  16. Gilly, W.F., Armstrong, C.M. 1982b. Slowing of sodium channel opening kinetics in squid axon by extracellular zinc. J. Gen. Physiol. 79:935–964Google Scholar
  17. Grahame, D.C. 1947. The electrical double layer and the theory of electrocapillarity. Chem. Rev. 41:441–501Google Scholar
  18. Grissmer, S., Cahalan, M. 1989. TEA prevents inactivation while blocking open K+ channels in human T lymphocytes. Biophys. J. 55:203–206Google Scholar
  19. Hahin, R., Campbell, D.T. 1983. Simple shifts in the voltage dependence of sodium channel gating caused by divalent cations. J. Gen. Physiol. 82:785–802Google Scholar
  20. Hille, B., Woodhull, A.M., Shapiro, B.I. 1975. Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nerve: divalent ions, monovalent ions, and pH. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 270:301–318Google Scholar
  21. Hodgkin, A.L., Huxley, A.F. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117:500–544Google Scholar
  22. Hoshi, T., Zagotta, W.N., Aldrich, R.W. 1990. Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science 250:533–538Google Scholar
  23. Hoshi, T., Zagotta, W.N., Aldrich, R.W. 1991. Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxyterminal region. Neuron 7:547–556Google Scholar
  24. Isakoff, E.Y., Jan, Y.N., Jan, L.Y. 1990. Evidence for the formation of heteromultimeric potassium channels in Xenopus oocytes. Nature 345:530–534Google Scholar
  25. Jan, L.Y., Jan, Y.N. 1989. Voltage-sensitive ion channels. Cell 56:13–25Google Scholar
  26. Keynes, R.D., Rojas, E. 1976. The temporal and steady-state relationships between activation of the sodium conductance and movement of the gating particles in the squid giant axons. J. Physiol. 255:157–189Google Scholar
  27. MacKinnon, R. 1991. Determination of the subunit stoichiometry of a voltage-activated potassium channel. Nature 350:232–234Google Scholar
  28. Mayer, M.L., Sugiyama, K. 1988. A modulatory action of divalent cations on transient outward current in cultured rat sensory neurones. J. Physiol. 396:417–433Google Scholar
  29. McLaughlin, S.G.A., Sabo, G., Eisenman, G. 1971. Divalent ions and the surface potential of charged phospholipid membrane. J. Gen. Physiol. 58:667–687Google Scholar
  30. Neher, E., Steinbach, J.H. 1978. Local anesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J. Physiol 277:153–176Google Scholar
  31. Oxford, G.S. 1981. Some kinetic and steady-state properties of sodium channels after removal of inactivation. J. Gen. Physiol. 77:1–22Google Scholar
  32. Ruppersberg, J.P., Schroter, K.H., Sakmann, B., Stocker, M., Sewing, S., Pongs, O. 1990. Heteromultimeric channels formed by rat brain potassium-channel proteins. Nature 345:535–537Google Scholar
  33. Sheng, M., Liao, Y.J., Jan, Y.N., Jan, L.Y. 1993. Presynaptic A-current based on heteromultimeric K+ channels detected in vivo. Nature 365:72–75Google Scholar
  34. Shoukimas, J.J. 1978. Effect of calcium upon sodium inactivation in the giant axons of Loligo pealei. J. Membrane Biol. 38:271–289Google Scholar
  35. Solc, C.K., Aldrich, R.W. 1990. Gating of single non-Shaker A-type potassium channels in Larval Drosophila neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 96:135–165Google Scholar
  36. Tytgat, J., Hess, P. 1992. Evidence for cooperative interactions in potassium channel gating. Nature 359:420–423Google Scholar
  37. Wang, H., Kunkel, D.D., Martin, T.M., Schwartzkroin, P.A., Tempel, B.L. 1993. Heteromultimeric K+ channels in terminal and juxtaparanodal regions of neurons. Nature 365:75–79Google Scholar
  38. Yeh, J.Z., Narahashi, T. 1977. Kinetic analysis of pancuronium interaction with sodium channels in squid axon membranes. J. Gen. Physiol. 69:293–323Google Scholar
  39. Yellen, G., Jurman, M.E., Abramson, T., MacKinnon, R. 1991. Mutations affecting internal TEA blockade identify the probable poreforming region of a K+ channel. Science 251:939–942Google Scholar
  40. Zagotta, W.N., Aldrich, R.W. 1990. Voltage-dependent gating of Shaker A-type potassium channels in Drosophila muscle. J. Gen. Physiol. 95:29–60Google Scholar
  41. Zagotta, W.N., Hoshi, T., Aldrich, R.W. 1990. Restoration of inactivation in mutants of Shaker potassium channels by a peptide derived from ShB. Science 250:568–571Google Scholar
  42. Zagotta, W.N., Hoshi, T., Aldrich, R.W. 1994. Shaker potassium channel gating III: Evaluation of kinetic models for activation. J. Gen. Physiol. 103:321–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. I. Alekseev
    • 1
  • M. C. Ziskin
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Cell Biophysics, Russian Academy of SciencesPuschinoRussia
  2. 2.Center for Biomedical Physics, Temple University Medical SchoolPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations