Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 39–76 | Cite as

Empty categories, case, and configurationality

  • Eloise Jelinek


Artificial Intelligence Empty Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aoun, Youssef: 1981, ‘Expletive PROs,’ MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  2. Borer, Hagit: 1981, ‘Comments on the Pro-drop Phenomena,’ MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 127–149.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, B. J.: 1977, Case Marking in Australian Languages, Linguistic Series No. 23, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. —: 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Six, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Comrie, Bernard: 1981, Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Demers, R. A. and E. Jelinek: 1982, ‘The Syntactic Functions of Person Marking in Lummi,’ Working Papers for the 17th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  8. Dixon, R. M. W.: 1972, The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dixon, R. M. W.: 1979, ‘Ergativity,’ Language 55, 59–138.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, R. M. W. and B. J. Blake: 1979, Handbook of Australian Languages, The Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  11. Farmer, Ann: 1983, ‘Consequences of the Configurationality Parameter,’ University of Arizona MS.Google Scholar
  12. --: 1984, Modularity in Syntax: A Comparison of Japanese and English, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hale, K.: 1967, ‘Preliminary Remarks on Walbiri Grammar,’ MIT mimeo.Google Scholar
  14. —: 1970, ‘The Passive and Ergative in Language Change; The Australian Case, Pacific Linguistic Studies in Honour of Arthur Capell, Linguistic Circle of Canberra, Canberra.Google Scholar
  15. —: 1973, ‘Person Marking in Walbiri,’ in S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  16. —: 1976, ‘The Adjoined Relative Clause in Australia,’ in R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Humanities Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  17. --: 1980, ‘Remarks on Japanese Phrase Structure: Comments on the Papers on Japanese Syntax,’ in Y. Otsu and A. Farmer (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  18. —: 1981, ‘On the Position of Warlpiri in a Typology of the Base,’ Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  19. —: 1982, ‘Preliminary Remarks on Configurationality,’ in J. Pustejovsky and P. Sells (eds.), NELS 12, 86–96.Google Scholar
  20. —: 1983, ‘Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-configurational Languages,’ NLLT, 1, 5–47.Google Scholar
  21. —, L. Jeanne, and P. Platero: 1977, ‘Three Cases of Overgeneration,’ in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Huang, C. T. James: (n.d.), MS, ‘On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.’Google Scholar
  23. Jelinek, Eloise: 1983a, ‘Person Marking in AUX in Egyptian Arabic,’ in F. Heny and B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. I, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
  24. —: 1983b, ‘Case and Configurationality,’ Coyote Papers, Vol. 4, University of Arizona, Tucson, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar
  25. —. and R. A. Demers: 1982, ‘Adjoined Clauses in Lummi,’ in Working Papers for the 17th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  26. — and R. A. Demers: 1983, ‘An Agent Hierarchy and Voice in Some Coast Salish Languages,’ IJAL, 49, 167–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinkade, M. Dale: 1983, ‘Salish Evidence Against the Universality of “Noun” and “Verb”,’ Lingua 60, 25–40.Google Scholar
  28. Kitagawa, C.: 1979, ‘A Note on Sono and Ano,’ in G. Bedell, Kobayashi, and Muraki (eds.), Explorations in Linguistics, Papers in Honor of Kazuko Inoue, Kenkyusha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  29. --: 1981, ‘Anaphora in Japanese: Kare and Zibun,’ in Ann Farmer and C. Kitagawa (eds.), Proceedings of the Arizona Conference on Japanese Linguistics, University of Arizona Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  30. —: 1982, ‘Topic Constructions in Japanese,’ Lingua 57, 175–214.Google Scholar
  31. --: 1983, ‘Case Marking and Nonconfigurationality,’ MS, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  32. Mallinson, G. and B. J. Blake: 1981, Language Typology, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Nash, D. G.: 1980, Topics in Warlpiri Grammar, unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  34. Saito, M. and Hajime Hoji: 1983, ‘Weak Crossover and Move α in Japanese,’ NLLT 1, 245–259.Google Scholar
  35. Simpson, Jane and Joan Bresnan: 1983, ‘Control and Obviation in Warlpiri,’ NLLT 1, 49–64.Google Scholar
  36. Steele, S., et al.: 1981, An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Five, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Steele, S.: To appear, A Syntax of Luiseno.Google Scholar
  38. Wierzbicka, A.: 1981, ‘Case Marking and Human Nature,’ Australian Journal of Linguistics 1, 43–80.Google Scholar
  39. Witherspoon, Gary: 1977, Language and Art in the Navajo Universe, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  40. Zepeda, Ofelia: 1983, Papago Grammar, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eloise Jelinek
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of LinguisticsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations