Advertisement

Experiments in Fluids

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 257–266 | Cite as

On interpretation of flow visualization of unsteady shear flows

  • I. Gursul
  • D. Lusseyran
  • D. Rockwell
Originals

Abstract

Flow visualization of an unsteady wake is simulated by computer-generated streaklines and timelines, the two most commonly employed markers in laboratory flows. The resultant visualization patterns are compared with prescribed vorticity fields having constant or decreasing strength. Effects on the visualized flow of thickness and location of the injected marker, discrete (as opposed to continuous) marker elements, and different reference frames are addressed.

Keywords

Vorticity Reference Frame Shear Flow Flow Visualization Vorticity Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Betchov, R.; Criminale, W. O. 1967: Stability of parallel flows. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Cimbala, J. M. 1984: Large structure in the far wakes of two-dimensional bluff bodies. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. Cimbala, J. M.; Nagib, H. M.; Roshko, A. 1981: Wake instability leading to new large scale structures downstream of bluff bodies. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 26, 1256Google Scholar
  4. Cimbala, J. M.; Nagib, H. M.; Roshko, A. 1988: Large structure in the far wakes of two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 265–298Google Scholar
  5. Emrich, R. J. 1981: Methods of experimental physics: fluid dynamics, 18, part A. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Hama, F. R. 1962: Streaklines in a perturbed shear flow. Phys. Fluids 5, 644–650Google Scholar
  7. Kurosaka, M.; Sundaram, P. 1986: Illustrative examples of streaklines in unsteady vortices: Interpretational difficulties revisited. Phys. Fluids 29, 3474–3477Google Scholar
  8. Lu, L. J.; Smith, C. R. 1985: Image processing of hydrogen bubble flow visualization for determination of turbulence statistics and bursting characteristics. Exp. Fluids 3, 349–356Google Scholar
  9. Lugt, H. J. 1979: The dilemma of defining a vortex. In: Recent developments in theoretical and experimental mechanics. (eds. Müller, U.; Roesner, K. G.; Schmidt, B.), pp. 309–321. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. Lugt, H. J. 1985: Vortex flow and maximum principles. Am. J. Phys. 53, 649–653Google Scholar
  11. Lusseyran, D.; Rockwell, D. 1988: Estimation of velocity eigenfunction and vorticity distributions from the timeline visualization technique. Exp. Fluids 6, 228–236Google Scholar
  12. Mattingly, G. E.; Criminale, W. O. 1972: The stability of an incompressible two-dimensional wake. J. Fluid Mech. 51, 233–273Google Scholar
  13. Merzkirch, W.; Chassery, J. M.; Hesselink, L.; Schon, J. P.; Lourenco, L.; Monti, R. 1986: Flow visualization and digital image processing. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Lecture Series Monographs. Based on June 9–13, 1986, Lecture Series, Designated as 1986–09 MonographGoogle Scholar
  14. Michalke, A. 1964: On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolictangent velocity profile. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543–556Google Scholar
  15. Michalke, A. 1965: On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 521–544Google Scholar
  16. Michalke, A. 1972: The instability of free shear layers. Progr. Aerospace Sci. 12, 213–239Google Scholar
  17. Michalke, A.; Freymuth, P. 1966: The instability and formation of vortices in a free shear layer. In: AGARD Conference Proc. No. 4 “Separated flows”, pt. 2, 575–595Google Scholar
  18. Perry, A. E.; Chong, M. S.; Lim, T. T. 1982: The vortex-shedding process behind two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 77–90Google Scholar
  19. Takami, H.; Keller, H. B. 1969: Steady two-dimensional viscous flow of an incompressible fluid past a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids, Suppl. II, 11–51Google Scholar
  20. Van Dyke, M. 1982: An album of fluid motion. Stanford/CA: Parabolic PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams, D. R.; Hama, F. 1980: Streaklines in a shear layer perturbed by two waves. Phys. Fluids 23, 442–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Gursul
    • 1
  • D. Lusseyran
    • 1
  • D. Rockwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics354 Packard Laboratory, Building 19, Lehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations