Increase of root induction in Pinus nigra explants using agrobacteria
- 67 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Summary
Wounding of explanted Pinus nigra primary explants followed by infection with Agrobacterium rhizogenes wild strains 8196, 15834, or with the pRiA4abc transconjugant strain of A. tumefaciens (C58 chromosomal background) resulted in adventitious root induction. Roots were formed in 60–97% of explants (1–3 roots/explant) but without a hairy root phenotype. The presence of T-DNA of pRi8196 or pRiA4abc in regenerated roots was confirmed by the opine (mannopinic acid) content. Transformation response was influenced by the bacterial strain, age of explant and period of co-cultivation. Both the aggregate state (liquid) of medium and the season of the year (spring) had a positive effect on the root induction and their development. Histological analysis of the transformed roots showed that complete elements of primary and secondary root structures were present but roots were always triarch or tetrarch in the central cylinder as opposed to the primary roots of the untransformed seedling wich are diarch.
Keywords
Hairy Root Adventitious Root Primary Root Root Induction Wild StrainPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ahuja MR (1988) In: Hanover JW, Kealthly DE (eds) Genetic manipulation of woody plants. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 25–41Google Scholar
- Clark G (1981) Staining procedures (4th ed). Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Chilton MD, Tepfer DA, Petit A, David C, Casse-Delbart F, Tempe J (1982) Nature 295: 432–434Google Scholar
- Diner AM, Karnosky DF (1987) In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry, Vol 2 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 351–373Google Scholar
- Ellis D, McCabe D, Russell D, McCown B, Martinell B (1988) In: Ahuja MR (ed) Woody plant biotechnology. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 269–281Google Scholar
- Gaspar Th, Coumans M (1987) In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry, Vol 2. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 202–217Google Scholar
- Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1972) Planta 107: 161–170Google Scholar
- Guivarch A, Caissard J-C, Brown S, Marie D, Dewitte W, Van Onckelen H, Chriguw D (1993) Protoplasma 174: 10–18Google Scholar
- Huang Y, Diner AM, Karnosky DF (1991) In Vitro Cell Devel Biol 27: 201–207Google Scholar
- Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A (1993) Transgen Res 2: 203–218Google Scholar
- Jelaska S (1987) In: Bonga J and Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry, Vol 3. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 42–61Google Scholar
- Jouanin L, Brasileiro ACM, Leple JC, Pilate G, Cornu D (1993) Arm Sci For 50: 325–336Google Scholar
- Magnussen D, Clapham D, Grönroos R, von Arnold S (1994) Scand J For Res 9: 46–51Google Scholar
- McAfee BJ, White EE, Pelcher LE, Lapp MS (1993) Plant CeU Tissue Organ Cult 34: 53–62Google Scholar
- Mission JP, Boxus P, Coumans M, Giot-Wirgot P, Gaspar Th (1983) Med Fac Landbouww Rijksuniv Gent 48: 1151–1157Google Scholar
- Petit A, David C, Dahl GA, Ellis JG, Guyon P, Casse-Delbart F, Tempe J (1983) Mol Gen Genet 190: 204–214Google Scholar
- Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Brown S, Vasseur G, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1992) Planta 188: 439–456Google Scholar
- Sass JE (1951) Botanical microtechnique. Iowa State College Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Shin D-J, Podila GK, Huang Y, Kamosky DF (1994) Can J For Res 24: 2059–2067Google Scholar
- Stipković S, Kolevska-Pletikapić B, Jelaska S (1995) Acta Pharm 45: 305–309Google Scholar
- Tepfer D (1989) In: Kosuge T, Nester EW (eds) Plant-microbe interactions. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 294–342Google Scholar
- Torrey JG (1988) In: Hanover JW, Kealthly DE (eds) The genetic manipulation of woody plants. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 1–21Google Scholar