Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 50–54 | Cite as

Regeneration of fertile plants from excised immature zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana

  • B. Kost
  • I. Potrykus
  • G. Neuhaus
Article

Summary

We present protocols for the regeneration of fertile plants from immature zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype “Zürich” either directly by multiple shoot formation from the apical region or indirectly by shoot induction from embryo derived calli. The regeneration efficiency by “multiple shooting” depended on the developmental stage of the cultured embryos and ranged from 15% for early heart shaped to 90% for early torpedo shaped and further developed embryos. 85% callus induction was achieved from embryos in the early torpedo shaped or a later stage of development. The efficiency of shoot induction from embryo derived calli varied between 25% and 75% in different experiments.

Abbreviations

BAP

6-benzylaminopurine

CIM

callus inducing medium

2,4-D

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

Gln

glutamine

IAA

indole-3-acetic acid

Kin

kinetin

NAA

l-naphthaleneacetic acid

2ip

2-isopentenylaminopurine

Pro

proline

RIM

root inducing medium

SIM

shoot inducing medium

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baus AD, Franzmann L, Meinke DW (1986) Theor Appl Genet 72: 577–586Google Scholar
  2. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hisajima S (1982) Biologia Plantarium 24: 235–238Google Scholar
  4. Hu C, Wang P (1986) In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV (eds) Handbook of plant cell culture, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp 43–96Google Scholar
  5. Karesch H, Bilang R, Potrykus I (1991) Plant Cell Reports 9: 575–578Google Scholar
  6. Kerr T, Anderson DB (1944) Plant Physiology 19: 338–349Google Scholar
  7. Lupotto E, Lusardi MC (1988) Maydica 33: 163–177Google Scholar
  8. Meyerowitz EM (1989) Cell 56: 263–269Google Scholar
  9. Monnier M (1976) Rev Cytol Biol Veg 39: 1–120Google Scholar
  10. Monnier M (1990) In: Bhojwani SS (ed) Plant tissue culture: applications and limitations, Elsevier, Amsterdam Oxford New York Tokyo, pp 366–393Google Scholar
  11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497Google Scholar
  12. Negrutiu I, Beeftink F, Jacobs M (1975) Plant Science Lettres 5: 293–304Google Scholar
  13. Potrykus I (1990) Bio/Technology 8: 535–542Google Scholar
  14. Raghavan V, Srivastava PS (1982) In: Johri BM (ed) Experimental embryology of vascular plants, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–230Google Scholar
  15. Rietsema J, Satina S, Blakeslee AF (1953) Am J Bot 40: 538–545Google Scholar
  16. Rijven AHGC (1952) Acta Bot Neerl 1: 157–200Google Scholar
  17. Rijven AHGC (1956) Aust J Biol Sci 9: 511–527Google Scholar
  18. Spangenberg G, Koop HU, Lichter R, Schweiger HG (1986) Physiol Plant 66: 1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Kost
    • 1
  • I. Potrykus
    • 1
  • G. Neuhaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Plant Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations