Micropropagation of Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R. Br. through axillary bud culture
- 122 Downloads
- 27 Citations
Abstract
A procedure for rapid in vitro propagation of the aromatic and medicinal plant Hemidesmus indicus (L.) R.Br. (Family Asclepiadaceae) from nodal explants is described. The highest shoot multiplication rate of 8.2 ± 0.4 shoots/explant with a 95% frequency was achieved in S weeks culture period on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 1.15 μM kinetin and 0.054 μM α-naphthaleneacetic acid. Excised shoots were rooted on the same basal medium supplemented with 1.15 μM kinetin and 7.35 μM indole-3-butyric acid. Shoots derived from subcultures exhibited better rooting response than those from primary cultures. After a hardening phase of 2 weeks, there was a 70% transplantation success in the field.
Keywords
Medicinal Plant Primary Culture Multiplication Rate Kinetin Culture PeriodAbbreviations
- MS
Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium
- BA
N6 benzyladenine; KN kinetin
- NAA
a-naphthaleneacetic acid
- IBA
indole-3-butyric acid
- IAA
indole-3-acetic acid
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Amin MN, Jaiswal VS (1988) Scientia Hort 36:89–95Google Scholar
- Aminuddin, Girach RD (1991) J Econ Tax Bot 15:715–718Google Scholar
- Anonymous (1965) The Wealth of India, Part VI, CSIR Publications New Delhi pp 266Google Scholar
- Anonymous (1980) The Wealth of India, Vol V. (Reprint), CSIR publications, New Delhi, pp 33Google Scholar
- Arora R, Bhojwani SS (1989) Plant Cell Reports 8:44–47Google Scholar
- Chopra RN, Nayar SR, Chopra IC (1980) Glossary of Indian medicinal plants (Reprinted), CSIR Publications, New Delhi pp 132Google Scholar
- Das PC, Joshi PC, Mandal S (1992) Indian J Chem 31(B):342–345Google Scholar
- Dhawan V, Bhojwani SS (1985) Plant Cell Reports 4:315–318Google Scholar
- Economou AS, Read PE (1986) HortScience 21:137–139Google Scholar
- Einset JW (1986) Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 36:635–640Google Scholar
- George FE, Sherrington PD (1984) Plant propagation by tissue culture — handbook and directory of commercial laboratories, Exegetics Ltd, Eversely, UK, pp 302Google Scholar
- Handro W, Floh EIS, Ferreira CM, Guerra MP (1988) Plant Cell Reports 7:564–566Google Scholar
- Hu CY, Wang PJ (1983) In:Evans et al. (eds) Handbook of plant cell culture, Vol I. Macmillan, New York, pp 177–227Google Scholar
- Lee SK, Rao AN (1986) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 7:43–51Google Scholar
- Mandal S, Das PC, Joshi PC, Chaterjee A (1991) Indian J Chem 30B:712–713Google Scholar
- Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
- Oberai K, Khare MP, Khare A (1985) Phytochemistry 24:2395–2397Google Scholar
- Padhy SN, Mahato SB, Dutta NL (1973) Phytochemistry 12:217Google Scholar
- Philip J, Nair GS, Premalatha, Sudhadevi PK (1991) Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices J 15:12–14Google Scholar
- Prakash K, Sethi A, Deepak D, Khare A, Khare MP (1991) Phytochemistry 30:279–299Google Scholar
- Prasad YR, Alankararao GSJG, Baby P (1983) Indian Perfumer 27:197–199Google Scholar
- Raghava Swamy BV, Himabindu K, Lakshmi Sita G (1992) Plant Cell Reports 11:126–131Google Scholar
- Sarasan V, Soniya EV, Nair GM (1994) Indian J Exp Biol 32:284–287Google Scholar
- Subramanian SA, Nair AGR (1968) Phytochemistry 7:217Google Scholar
- Wang PJ, Hu CY (1984) Z Pflanzenphysiol 113:331–335Google Scholar
- Williams RR, Acram MT, Janet AB (1984) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 3:273–281Google Scholar