Cell and Tissue Research

, Volume 159, Issue 1, pp 73–80 | Cite as

Osteoblasts and collagen orientation

  • S. J. Jones
  • A. Boyde
  • J. B. Pawley


Bone was removed from the calvaria of anaesthetized 70 g rats or freshly killed young monkeys and the fibrous periosteum dissected off the inner, formative surface under 0.15 M cacodylate buffer. The bone and undisturbed osteoblasts were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in the same buffer for 24 to 48 hours, critical point dried and coated with evaporated carbon and gold for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Fields of osteoblasts were photographed and chosen cells dissected off the osteoid using a tungsten needle. The control of the dissection was made possible by the use of a system of real-time stereo TV-speed SEM. The fields were rephotographed and the orientations of the osteoblasts were compared with that of the underlying collagen fibres. 62% of all osteoblasts lay with their long axes within 15° of the collagen fibre orientation below and 80% within 30°. Montages of large areas of osteoblasts were also made, and then compared with ones of the same area after the cells had been stripped off on adhesive tape. In general, the orientation of the collagen tended to be the same as the cell that formed it. Collagen fibres below cells at the periphery of a domain sometimes had the orientation of the cells in the adjacent patch. It is not possible to determine whether the cells controlled the orientation of the collagen, or vice versa, from this experiment, but other SEM evidence suggests that the collagen orientation in hard tissue matrices depends on the freedom of cells to move with respect to the matrix surface.

Key words

Osteoblasts Collagen orientation Parietal bone Rat, Rhesus monkey Scanning electron microscopy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bidder, A.: Osteobiologie. Arch, mikr.-anat. 68, 137–213 (1906)Google Scholar
  2. Boyde, A.: Biological specimen preparation for the scanning electron microscope—an overview. SEM/1972 pp. 257–264, IITRI. Chicago (1972a)Google Scholar
  3. Boyde, A.: Scanning electron microscopic studies of bone. Chapter in: The biochemistry and physiology of bone, vol. I, ed. G. H. Bourne. New York and London: Academic Press 1972bGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyde, A.: A stereo plotting device for SEM micrographs: and a real-time 3-D system for the SEM. IITRI/1974, ed. O. Johari and I. Corvin. pp. 93–100 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. Boyde, A., Hobdell, M.: Scanning electron microscopy of lamellar bone. Z. Zellforsch. 93, 213–231 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Boyde, A., Jones, S. J.: Bone and other hard tissues. Chapter in: Principles and techniques of scanning electron microscopy, ed. M. A. Hayat. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company 1974Google Scholar
  7. Elsdale, T. R., Bard, J. B. L.: Collagen substrata for studies on cell behaviour. J. Cell Biol. 54, 626–637 (1972)Google Scholar
  8. Elsdale, T. R., Bard, J. B. L.: Cellular interactions in morphogenesis of epithelial mesenchymal systems. J. Cell Biol. 63, 343–349 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. Elsdale, T. R., Poley, R.: Morphogenetic aspects of multilayering in petri dish cultures of human fetal lung fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 41, 298–311 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Enlow, D. H.: A comparative study in facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Amer. J. phys. Anthrop. 24, 293–308 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Gegenbaur, C.: Über die Bildung des Knochengewebes. Jena Z. Med. Naturw. 1, 343–369 (1864)Google Scholar
  12. Jones, S. J.: Morphological and experimental observations on bony tissues using the scanning electron microscope. Ph. D. Thesis, University of London (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Kölliker, A.: A manual of human microscopic anatomy. London: Parker & Sons 1860Google Scholar
  14. Kölliker, A.: Die normale Resorption des Knochengewebes und ihre Bedeutung für die Entstehung der typischen Knochenformen. Leipzig: Vogel 1873Google Scholar
  15. Pritchard, J. J.: The osteoblast. Chapter 2 in: The biochemistry and physiology of bones, vol. I, 2nd ed., ed. G. H. Bourne. New York and London: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar
  16. Rovensky, Y. A., Slavnaja, I. L., Vasiliev, J. M.: Behaviour of fibroblast-like cells on grooved surfaces. Exp. Cell Res. 65, 193–201 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Jones
    • 1
  • A. Boyde
    • 1
  • J. B. Pawley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversity College LondonUK

Personalised recommendations