Space and time variations of the solar Na D line profiles
- 23 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
- (i)
The line profiles vary strongly with space and time implying that time averaging over a long period and large area will not produce the ‘true’ profile.
- (ii)
The centre-limb increase in apparent Doppler width in the D lines is intrinsic. It is not due to space or time averaging.
- (iii)
The amplitude of the 300-s oscillation may range up to 1.5 km/s in the region of formation of the D lines. Large line asymmetries are associated with this motion. Observations which do not resolve this motion can not be considered adequate.
- (iv)
The variation of the D line profile caused by the 300-s oscillation may be described as follows: (a) The core is raised and lowered without change of shape, (b) The wings broaden as the central intensity rises and narrow as it falls. These variations are qualitatively explained by the scanning of the line formation region through the solar atmosphere.
- (v)
Doppler width values derived from pairs of D line profiles are strongly correlated with the motion of the element observed. Hotter elements move upward, cooler downward.
- (vi)
Indications of running waves have been found in the time variation of the core line bisectors.
The profile variations observed provide a framework in which various properties of the centre limb variation of these lines may be considered. In particular they show that any expectation of accuracy in profile coincidence above a certain value must be doomed by the intrinsic variability of the solar atmosphere.
Keywords
Time Variation Central Intensity Line Profile Solar Atmosphere Formation RegionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allen, C. W.: 1939, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 100, 10.Google Scholar
- Athay, R. G. and Canfield, W.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 695.Google Scholar
- Brault, J. W.: 1962, Thesis Princeton University.Google Scholar
- Brault, J. W. and White, O. R.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. (to be published).Google Scholar
- Brault, J. W., Slaughter, C. D., Pierce, A. K., and Aikens, R. S.: 1971, Solar Phys. 18, 366.Google Scholar
- Curtis, G. W. and Jefferies, J. T.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 1061.Google Scholar
- Frazier, E. N.: 1967, Z. Astrophys. 68, 345.Google Scholar
- Frazier, E. N.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 152, 557.Google Scholar
- Gonczi, G. and Roddier, F.: 1969, Solar Phys. 8, 255.Google Scholar
- Gonczi, G. and Roddier, F.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 28.Google Scholar
- Hines, C. O.: 1960, J. Phys. 38, 1441.Google Scholar
- Ivanov, V. V.: 1963, Sov. Astron. 6, 793.Google Scholar
- Jefferies, J. T.: 1968, Spectral Line Formation, Ginn-Blaisdell.Google Scholar
- Leibacher, J.: 1971, Thesis Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Olson, E. C.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 143, 904.Google Scholar
- Pierce, A. K.: 1964, Kitt Peak Contributions, No. 65.Google Scholar
- Pierce, A. K.: 1970, Private communication.Google Scholar
- Risberg, P.: 1956, Arkiv Fysik 10, 583.Google Scholar
- Sheeley, N. G.: 1970, Private communication.Google Scholar
- Snider, J. L.: 1970, Solar Phys. 12, 352.Google Scholar
- Uhlrich, R. K.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 162, 993.Google Scholar
- Waddell, J. H.: 1962, Astrophys. J. 136, 223.Google Scholar
- Waddell, J. H.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 1210.Google Scholar
- White, O. R.: 1971, Private communication.Google Scholar
- Wilson, A. M. and Worrall, G.: 1969, Astron. Astrophys. 2, 458.Google Scholar
- Worrall, G.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 12, 88.Google Scholar