Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 161–197 | Cite as

Language and mathematical education

  • J. L. Austin
  • A. G. Howson


Mathematical Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abidjan, Conference on ‘Mathématique et Milieu en Afrique’ 1978-Report to appear (Conference included presentations and working groups devoted to linguistic problems).Google Scholar
  2. Accra workshop, Languages and the Teaching of Science and Mathematics with Special Reference to Africa, London, Commonwealth Ass. for Science and Maths Edn., 1975. Report of seminar held from 27 Oct–1 Nov. 1975. Papers by Taiwo and Mmari. Bibliography (27).Google Scholar
  3. Adelman, C. and Walker, R., Flander's System for the Analysis of Classroom Interaction-a Study of Failure in Research, CARE, University of East Anglia, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Aiken, L. R., ‘Verbal Factors in Mathematics Education: a Review of Research’, J. Res. Ed. 2, (1971), 304–313. A precursor-taking a more limited view-of Aiken (1972).Google Scholar
  5. Aiken, L. R., Language Factors in Learning Mathematics, Mathematics Education Reports, ERIC, October 1972. A survey report with good bibliography (96). Considers factors affecting mathematical ability and experimental evidence, including readability tests, and the importance of verbalisation in conceptual learning. Relation between reading and mathematical development; the latter possibly similar to second language learning? Communication.Google Scholar
  6. Allardice, B., ‘The Development of Written Representations for Some Mathematical Concepts’, J. Child. Math. Behaviour I(4) (1977), 135–160. Early encounters with symbolism.Google Scholar
  7. Amidon, E. J. and Hunter, E., Improving Teching: Analysis Verbal Interaction in the Classroom, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. Arnold, H., ‘Why Children Talk: Language in the Primary Classroom’, Ed. for Teaching (1973).Google Scholar
  9. A.T.M. (ed. Wheeler, D. H.), Notes on Mathematics in Primary Schools, London, Cambridge University Press, 1967. Contains many examples of classroom usage and many references, both implicit and explicit, to language.Google Scholar
  10. A.T.M., Mathematical Reflections, London, Cambridge University Press, 1970. Collection of essays, some of which, e.g. Tahta, Caldwell, Thornton, directly concern language.Google Scholar
  11. A.T.M. (ed. Wheeler, D. H.), Notes on Mathematics for Children, London, Cambridge University Press, 1977. Similar to A.T.M., 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Ausubel, D.P., “Some Psychological and Educational Limitations of Learning by Discovery’, The Arithmetic Teacher 11 (1964), 290–302. Discussion of discovery methods which suggests that these may still be rote learning-of procedures rather than formulae. Verbalisation constitutes a part of abstraction so that verbal teaching is often adequate and quicker, when sequenced suitably.Google Scholar
  13. Ausubel, D. P., ‘A Cognitive Structure View of Word and Concept Meaning’, in Readings in the Psychology of Cognition (Eds. Anderson, R. C. and Ausubel, D. P.), New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  14. Balow, I. H., “Reading and Computation Ability as Determinants of Problem Solving’, The Arithmetic Teacher 11 (1964), 18–22. Survey of previous research and description of experimental procedure involving total ability ranges-unlike earlier work. Concludes that reading ability also is required for solving verbal problems.Google Scholar
  15. Banwell, C., Saunders, K., and Tahta, D., Starting Points: for Teaching Mathematics in Middle and Secondary Schools, London, Oxford University Press, 1972. A collection of ideas for the presentation of mathematical concepts, together with some provocative remarks concerning mathematics education and teacher influence.Google Scholar
  16. Barnes, D., Britton, J., Rosen, H., and the N.A.T.E., Language, the Learner and the School, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1969, 1971 (revised ed.). Raises a wide variety of problems concerning language in education, especially relating to talking.Google Scholar
  17. Barnes, D., ‘Language and Learning in the Classroom’, J. Curr. Studies 3(1) (1971(a)), 29–38.Google Scholar
  18. Barnes, D., ‘Classroom Contexts for Language and Learning’, Ed. Review 23 (1971(b)), 235–247.Google Scholar
  19. Barnes, D., From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
  20. Bauersfeld, H., ‘Kommunikationsmuster im Mathematikunterricht’, IDM, Bielefeld, 1978. A discussion of the use of language in the classroom.Google Scholar
  21. Bell, D., Hughes, E. R., and Rogers, J. Area, Weight and Volume: Monitoring and Encouraging Children's Conceptual Development, London, Nelson (for the Schools Council), 1975. Gives guidelines for teaching these concepts based on Piaget (including discussion of sign-signifier relationship), and especially the need for verbalisation-questioning in particular-at all stages, thus deducing from experience.Google Scholar
  22. Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., and Smith, F. L.Jr., The Language of the Classroom, New York, Teachers College Press, Teachers College Columbia University, 1966. Theoretical description of classroom discourse analysed as a game (Wittgenstein), with experimental analyses assessed in detail. Games consist of various moves which are fairly consistent in pattern of occurrence, and teacher controlled.Google Scholar
  23. Bernstein, B., Class Codes and Control: 1 Theoretical Studies, 2 Applied Studies, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971, 1973. Collected essays of a leading exponent of socio-linguistics.Google Scholar
  24. Braine, M. D. S., ‘Piaget on Reasoning: a Methodological Critique and Alternative Proposals', in Kessen, W. and Kuhlman, C. (eds.), Thought in the Young Child, Child Devt. Mono., 27(2) (1962) 41–61.Google Scholar
  25. Britton, J., Language and Learning, Harmondsworth, Allen Lane, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Bruner, J. S., Towards a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Paperbacks, 1966. A collection of essays about learning, knowing, developing and teaching. References to language.Google Scholar
  27. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, J. A., A Study of Thinking, New York, Wiley, 1956.Google Scholar
  28. Bruner, J. S., Olver, R., and Greenfield, P., Studies in Cognitive Growth, New York, Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  29. Brunner, R. B., ‘Reading Mathematical Exposition’, Ed. Research 18(3) (1976), 208–213. Attempts to provide an ‘operational definition of successful reading of mathematics’.Google Scholar
  30. Cajori, F. A History of Mathematical Notations, La Salle, Open Court, 1928. An invaluable source for those who believe that history can provide guidance. Vol. II contains some interesting quotations (and references to writing) on language and symbolism by such authors as de Morgan, Babbage, Branford, Whitehead, etc. Also accounts of international attempts to standardise notation.Google Scholar
  31. Call, R. J. and Wiggin, N. A., ‘Reading and Mathematics’, The Mathematics Teacher 59 (1966), 149–157. Experiments show that teaching reading of mathematics texts improves performance of verbal problems. Teachers need to be able to give specialised reading instruction.Google Scholar
  32. Cantieni, G. and Tremblay, R., ‘The Use of Concrete Mathematical Situations in Learning a Second Language: a Dual Learning Concept’, Tesol Quart. 7(3) (1973), 279–288. English/French-primary school mathematics interdisciplinary approach.Google Scholar
  33. Capps, L. R., “Teaching Mathematical Concepts Using Language Arts Analogies’, The Arithmetic Teacher 17 (1970), 329–331. Lists mathematical and literal examples of concepts: commutativity, associativity, distributivity, positional value, expanded notation, etc.Google Scholar
  34. Carnap, R., The Logical Syntax of Language, London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1937. A classic work on the philosophy of science leading to the conclusion ‘the logic of science is nothing other than the logical syntax of the language of science’.Google Scholar
  35. Carpenter, E. and McLuhan, M. (eds.), Explorations in Communication, Boston, Beacon Press, 1960. A collection of short articles dealing with many aspects of communication-visual, verbal, tactile-with references to cultural, psychological and geometric factors affecting the processes involved.Google Scholar
  36. carpenter, T. P. (ed.), ‘Notes from National Assessment: Word Problems’, The Arithmetic Teacher 23 (1976), 3, 389–393.Google Scholar
  37. Carroll, J. B., Language and Thought, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1964. Discusses psychological aspects of language as a means of communication and as a process of cognition and thinking. Summarises linguistic structure theories, language learning, and language disabilities.Google Scholar
  38. Cashdan, A. and Grugeon, E. (eds.), Language in Education, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972. Varied essays not specifically mathematical, e.g., H. Rosen on “The Language of Textbooks’.Google Scholar
  39. Chapman, L. R. (ed.), The Process of Learning Mathematics, Oxford, Pergamon, 1972. A collection of articles some of which, e.g., Skemp's, refer to language.Google Scholar
  40. Chausard, M., ‘Mathématique et Langage’, Rev. Gén Enseignt. Déf audit 68(4) (1976), 215–35. An account of teaching mathematics to deaf children.Google Scholar
  41. Chomsky, N., Language and Mind, New York, Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1968. A key work of (possibly) the most influential contemporary linguist. It offers a philosophical survey of theories past and present, including Chomsky's own, with reference to the psychology of mind.Google Scholar
  42. Clark, M., An Investigation into the New Zealand Forms I to IV Mathematics Syllabus, M.Sc. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, 1976. Indicates extent of confusion caused by differences in the colloquial and mathematical use of words and the difficulty in assimilating the meaning of technical terms.Google Scholar
  43. Clarkson, D. M., Children Talking Mathematics, M. Ed. thesis, University of Exeter, 1973. (See also ‘A Bit of Research’, Maths Teaching 65 (1973), 26–30.)Google Scholar
  44. Clements, M. A. and Gough, J., ‘The Relative Contributions of School Experience and Cognitive Development to Mathematics Performance’, in Learning and Applying Mathematics (ed.)Williams, D., Victoria, Australia, Math. Assn. of Victoria, 1978. A rigorous critique of Collis's Piagetian-style research in which considerable attention is placed on the role of language: both the use of mathematical language by psychologists and the child's gradual acquisition of mathematical language.Google Scholar
  45. Coard, B., How the West Indian Child is Educationally Sub-Normal in the British School System, London, New Beacon Books, 1971. The effects of linguistic differences.Google Scholar
  46. Cole, M., et al. The Cultural Context of Learning and Thinking, New York, Basic Books, 1971. Includes a discussion of the cultural influences on classification, problem solving and logic.Google Scholar
  47. Colmez, F., ‘Teaching Mathematics at Pre-Elementary and Elementary Level’, Survey paper prepared for 3rd ICME, Karlsruhe, 1976. Contains several interesting comments on language, including some on that ‘artificial language’ devised in the 1960s which embraces sentences such as ‘the set of all girls who do not wear dresses’.Google Scholar
  48. Connolly, P. G., ‘The Language of Mathematical Operations’, Eng. Lang. J. 1 (1) (1970), 25–31.Google Scholar
  49. Cormack, A., A Study of Language in Mathematics Text-Books, M. Phil Thesis, Chelsea College, 1978. Books for 11-year-olds.Google Scholar
  50. Coulthard, R. M. et al., Discourse in the Classroom, CIIT, 1972.Google Scholar
  51. Coulthard, R. M. and Sinclair, J. McH., Towards an Analysis of Discourse, London, Oxford University Press, 1975. Review of literature on analysis of classroom discourse, description of method of analysis, examples analysed. Draws analogies between linguistic, grammatical and discourse analysis.Google Scholar
  52. Creber, P., Lost for Words, Marmondswoth, Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
  53. Crystal, D., Linguistics, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1971. General introduction giving social and historical contexts for an outline of the major theories and controversies.Google Scholar
  54. Dale, E. and Chall, J. L., ‘A Formula for Predicting Readability’, Ed. Res. Bull. (Jan. 1949), 11–20.Google Scholar
  55. Davidson, J. E., ‘The Language Experience Approach to Story Problems’, The Arithmetic Teacher 25 (1977), 28.Google Scholar
  56. Davis, R. B., Mathematics Teaching-With Special Reference to Epistemological Problems. Journal of Research and Development in Education, monog. 1 (1967). A discussion of the aims and methods of mathematics education by extensive (oblique) analogies, examples of particular teaching situations, and analysis of experimental techniques. Stimulates many questions-not specifically linguistic.Google Scholar
  57. Davis, R. B., See also Journal of Children's Mathematical Behaviour.Google Scholar
  58. Dienes, Z. P., The Six Stages in the Process of Learning Mathematics, Windsor, Berks., NFER 1973, (trans. P. L. Seaborne. Originally published as Les Six Etapes du Processus d'Apprentissage en Mathématiques) Brief description of the six stages into which Dienes classifies learning, followed by their exemplification in three specific cases. Stage 5 is concerned with the invention of language to describe a mathematical situation.Google Scholar
  59. Earp, N. W., ‘Procedures for Teaching Reading in Mathematics’, The Arithmetic Teacher 17 (1970a), 575–579. Mentions some problems related to specifically mathematical reading, together with suggestions on methods of overcoming them. Verbal problem solving technique is given as a specific example.Google Scholar
  60. Earp, N. W., ‘Observations on Teaching Reading in Mathematics’, J. of Reading 13 (1970b), 529–532.Google Scholar
  61. Easton, J. B., ‘A Tudor Euclid’, Scripta Mathematica XXVII (1966), 339–355.Google Scholar
  62. Ebeling, D. G., The Ability of Sixth Grade Students to Associate Mathematical Terms with Related Algorithms, Ed.D. thesis, Indiana, 1973.Google Scholar
  63. Engle, P. L., The use of Vernacular Languages in Education, Center for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, Va., 1975. A survey paper: good bibliography (93). Not specifically mathematical. Also in Rev. Ed. Res. 45(2) (Spring, 1975), 283–325.Google Scholar
  64. Exeter Congress, Developments in Mathematical Education (Howson, A. G., ed), London, Cambridge University Press, 1973. Proceedings of 2nd ICME Congress, Exeter, 1972, (which included a working group on language). Relevant articles include those by Leach, Philp and Thom.Google Scholar
  65. Farnham, D. J., Children's Use of Language in Developing Mathematical Relationships, M. Ed. Dissertation, Exeter, 1975. An account of classroom-based investigatory work. Also survey of literature: extensive bibliography.Google Scholar
  66. Fey, J. T., Patterns of Verbal Communication in Mathematics Classes, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 1969.Google Scholar
  67. Fielker, D. S., ‘Editorial’, Mathematics Teaching 80 (Sept. 1977), 2–3. Includes comments on language and workcards.Google Scholar
  68. Flanders, N. A., Interaction Analysis in the Classroom, University of Minnesota, 1960.Google Scholar
  69. Flanders, N. A., Analyzing Teaching Behaviour, Reading Mass., Addison Wesley, 1970.Google Scholar
  70. Flössner, W., ‘Sprachbarriere-durch Mathematik’, Neue Unterrichtspraxis Hanover, 1974, 1, 13. Criticism of the language used in ‘new math.’ workbooks for primary schools-may lead to building up of a selective language barrier in the classroom.Google Scholar
  71. Fordham, D. L., An Investigation of 3rd, 4th and 5th Graders' Knowledge of the Meaning of Selected Symbols Associated with Multiplication of Whole Numbers, Ed. D. thesis, Georgia, 1974.Google Scholar
  72. Forseth, W. J., ‘Does the Study of Geometry Help Improve Reading Ability?’ The Mathematics Teacher 54 (1961), 12–13. Suggests that solving geometry problems is in some ways similar to reading, and describes experimental evidence to show that the study of geometry (as opposed to other subjects) improved reading ability.Google Scholar
  73. Freudenthal, H., Mathematics as an Educational Task, Dordrecht, Holland, Reidel, 1973. A wide-ranging survey of mathematical education which includes many references to problems of language. An interesting critique on the use of language in Piagetian ‘tests’. See also Weeding and Sowing: Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education, Dordrecht, Holland, Reidel, 1977.Google Scholar
  74. Fujiwara, S., ‘Problems in Mathematical Symbolism-The Third, 5. Ambiguous Words’. Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. VIII (1964), 18–26.Google Scholar
  75. Furth, H. G., Thinking without Language, New York, Free Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  76. Furth, H. G., Piaget for Teachers, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  77. Furth, H. G., Deafness and Learning, Belmont, Cal., Wadsworth, 1973. Piagetian ideas applied to the teaching of the deaf.Google Scholar
  78. Gagné, R. M., ‘The Learning of Principles’, in Klausmeier, H. J. and Harris, C. W. Analyses of Concept Learning, New York, Academic Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  79. Gallop, R. and Kirkman, D. F., ‘An Investigation into Relative Performances on a Bilingual Test Paper in Mechanical Mathematics’, Educational Research 15(1) (Nov. 1972), 63–71. Contradictory assessments of advantages of bilingualism in education led authors to assess simultaneous English/Welsh test papers. Bilingual papers preferable for bilinguals. Bibliography (29).Google Scholar
  80. Garbe, D. G., Indians and Non-Indians of the Southwestern U.S.: Comparison of Concepts for Selected Mathematics Terms. Ph.D. thesis, Texas, 1973. Indians more likely than non-Indians to prefer verbal to symbolic representation for number word.Google Scholar
  81. Gattegno, C., ‘Mathematics and the Deaf’, in For the Teaching of Mathematics (2), Reading, Educ. Explorers, 1963. Reflections on non-verbal teaching.Google Scholar
  82. Gattegno, C., What We Owe Children, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. Questions philosophical and psychological bases for education, and derives an approach-‘the subordination of teaching to learning’-from this. Asks many questions, especially concerning mathematics and reading.Google Scholar
  83. Gay, J., ‘Mathematics, Language and Effective Teaching’, UNESCO, Paris, September 1974. The interactions of culture, language and mathematics teaching. A paper prepared for the Nairobi Conference.Google Scholar
  84. Gay, J. and Cole, M., The New Mathematics and an Old Culture, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967. Cultural background to mathematics of the people (with comparisons with Western culture), linguistic structure's influence on thought/learning ability, suggestions for effective teaching.Google Scholar
  85. Gay, J. and Cole, M., Mathematics and Logic in the Kpelle Language, Ibadan, University of Ibadan Press, 1971. Examples of how mathematical and logical thought appear in the Kpelle language.Google Scholar
  86. Gentilhomme, Y., ‘De Saussure avait raison ou les mathématiques, pourquoi?’. Langues Modernes 65(3) (1971), 61–73. Comparison of the studies of linguistics and mathematics.Google Scholar
  87. Giles, W. H., ‘Mathematics in Bilingualism: a Pragmatic Approach’, ISA Bulletin 55 (1969), 19–26.Google Scholar
  88. Gilliland, J., Readability, London, University of London Press, 1972. General introduction describing recognised variables and tests used to measure them. Readable!Google Scholar
  89. Gimpel, M., ‘Zu einigen Fragen der Häufigkeit des Auftretens mathematischer Begriffe in der Lehrbüchern für den Mathematikunterricht an der Oberschule’, Mathematik in der Schule 10 (1972) 2, 82–89. On the need for the frequent repetition of mathematical terms in textbooks.Google Scholar
  90. Ginsberg, H., The Myth of the Deprived Child, New York, Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  91. Goeppert, H. C. (ed.), Sprachverhalten im Unterricht, Munich, W. Fink, 1977.Google Scholar
  92. Goutard, M., Mathematics and Children, Reading, England, Educational Explorers, 1964. Descriptions and examples of learning through experience.Google Scholar
  93. Greenfield, P. M., ‘On Culture and Conservation’ in Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., and Greenfield, P. M., Studies in Cognitive Growth (q.v.).Google Scholar
  94. Griffiths, H. B., ‘What is Mathematics Education?’, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 6 (1975), 3–15. (See also ‘The Structure of Pure Mathematics’ in Wain, G. (ed.), Mathematical Education, Wokingham, Van Nostrand, Reinhold, 1978.)Google Scholar
  95. Griffiths, H. B., Surfaces, London, Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  96. Grossnickle, F. E. ‘Verbal Problem Solving’, The Arithmetic Teacher, 11 (1964), 12–17. Description of problem-solving procedure, based on assumption that three levels of maturity exist for this, together with specific examples.Google Scholar
  97. Guilbaud, G. Th., ‘Les Langages d'Espaces’, in New Applications of Mathematics in Secondary Education, Luxemburg, 1975, 29–39. How terms and concepts of space language (geometry, topology) are used in every day life.Google Scholar
  98. Gusset, J. C., Ghetto Children and Mathematics, 1971, (available from ERIC). The need to use the child's non-standard English in the mathematics lesson.Google Scholar
  99. Hadamard, J., Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1949. ‘The words or the language, as they are written or spoken, do not seem to play any role in my mechanism of thought’ Einstein.Google Scholar
  100. Halliday, M. A. K., ‘Language and Experience’, Ed. Review 20(2) (1968), 95–106. Children's language problems.Google Scholar
  101. Halliday, M. A. K., ‘Aspects of Sociolinguistic Research’, UNESCO, Paris, 1974. A survey paper prepared for the 1974 Nairobi Conference.Google Scholar
  102. Halstead, M. H., Language Level, a Missing Concept in Information Theory, Tech Report 75, Purdue University, 1972.Google Scholar
  103. Hanke, B. et al., ‘Soziale Interaktion im Unterricht’, Darstellung und Anwendung des Interaktionsanalyse — Systems von N. A. Flanders, Munich, Oldenbourg, 1974. Presents Flanders' system of social interaction in the classroom, and demonstrates its applicability to a practical example.Google Scholar
  104. Hann, G., ‘Language, Logic and the Conditional’, Mathematics Teaching, 59 (1972), 18–20. Logical symbolism cannot be imposed on English language since motivation for connectives is often linguistic rather than logical. This leads to problems with communication, especially in giving exemplification to logical structures (through everyday examples) to aid teaching.Google Scholar
  105. Heddens, J. W. and Smith, K. J., ‘The Readability of Elementary Mathematics Books’, The Arithmetic Teacher 11 (1964), 466–468. Readability formulae were applied to several textbooks. Found: (i) readability higher than assigned grade level; (ii) variation of readability level among books considered; (iii) variation within each textbook indicates some portions of texts should be comprehended by most students while other portions of same text are relatively difficult.Google Scholar
  106. Hendrix, G., ‘Learning by Discovery’, The Mathematics Teacher 54 (1961), 290–299. Distinguishes three types of discovery method, which are each exemplified, and regards verbalisation as a means of communication not of conceptualisation. Conceptualisation proceeds by non-verbal awareness.Google Scholar
  107. Henkin, L. A.,‘Linguistic Aspects of Mathematical Education’, in Lamon, W. E., Learning and the Nature of Mathematics (q.v.) On the introducation to young children of variables, quantifiers and other linguistic patterns.Google Scholar
  108. Henry, J., Essays on Education, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1971. A provocative discussion of sociological factors in education-expectations, aspiration, failure, motivation and the means by which these are communicated, cultivated, or destroyed, in several cultures but mainly American.Google Scholar
  109. Hersee, J., ‘Notation and Language in School Mathematics’, Math. Gazette 61 (1977), 241–247. An attempt at standardisation of language and notation.Google Scholar
  110. Hirabayashi, I., ‘Problems in Mathematical Symbolism-The Second, 4. Logical Words’. Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. VII (1964), 43–52.Google Scholar
  111. Hirabayashi, I., ‘Some Problems in Pedagogy of Mathematics II-Semiotic Aspects of Problems in Mathematics Education’. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University, Part 1, No. 22, 1973. ‘Children begin their learning of mathematics in the level of semantics and then pass into the level of syntax and later they often return again to the level of semantics.’Google Scholar
  112. Hirabayashi, I. and Fujii, M., ‘Problems in Mathematical Education-The Fourth, 7. On Contraction of Mathematical Symbols’. Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. X (1975), 1–14. Mathematics largely symbolisation, contraction of symbols, constitution of the new syntax of contracted symbols.Google Scholar
  113. Hirabayashi, I. and Katayama, K. ‘Some Linguistic Aspects of Geometrical Diagrams’, Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. XVII (1969), 1–14. Can geometrical diagrams be regarded as linguistic symbols, subject to rules of linguistics? Semantic, but not syntactical, rules found in geometry.Google Scholar
  114. Hollands, R., ‘Language and Mathematics’, Mathematics for the Least Able, 11 to 14, Newsletter No. 11 (Feb. 1977), 4–5. The Scottish Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technical Education. On avoiding and alleviating reading problems.Google Scholar
  115. Hunt, J. McV., Intelligence and Experience, New York, Ronald Press, 1961. A survey of several theories concerning human intelligence and thinking, including Piaget's work, and discussions of experimental evidence.Google Scholar
  116. Iida, M., ‘Problems in Mathematical Symbolism-The Third, 6. On Easiness of Mathematical Symbolism’, Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. VIII (1964), 27–32. Attempts to classify symbols according to factors such as ideographic content, degree of contraction, etc.Google Scholar
  117. INRDP, Etude du rôle des moyens d'expression dans l'apprentissage mathématique. Various reports, Paris.Google Scholar
  118. Irish, E. H., ‘Improving Problem Solving by Improving Verbal Generalisation’, The Arithmetic Teacher 11 (1964), 169–175. Description of experiments designed to test whether improved verbal generalisation aided verbal problem solving. The results show that it did.Google Scholar
  119. Iwago, K., ‘Problems in Mathematical Symbolism-The Second, 3. Equivocal Words’, Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. VII (1964), 35–42. “Equivocal word” if single “symbolism” used for different “substances”-shades of meaning. Collects and classifies equivocal words, with aim of deciding how to teach them.Google Scholar
  120. Jansson, L. C., ‘Structural and Linguistic Variables that Contribute to Difficulty in the Judgement of Simple Verbal Deductive Arguments’, Educ. Studies Math. 5 (1974), 493–505. A statistically based study of deductive reasoning.Google Scholar
  121. Jerman, M. E., ‘Problem Length as a Structural Variable in Verbal Arithmetic Problems’, Educ. Studies Math. 5 (1973), 109–123. Tests given to pupils in Grades 4,5,6,7,8. Difficulty of problem not solely influenced by numbers of words, but by their relation to other factors-possibly syntactic. Earlier work shows length variable (number of words) more important in upper grades.Google Scholar
  122. Jerman, M. E. and Mirman, S., ‘Linguistic and Computational Variables in Problem Solving in Elementary Mathematics’, Educ. Studies Math. 5 (1974), 317–362. Linear regression model used to predict number of students who would solve verbal arithmetic problems correctly. Significant variables: number of long words, adverbs of time, mathematical terms, and length of longest sentence.Google Scholar
  123. Johnson, H. C., ‘The Effect of Instruction in Mathematical Vocabulary Upon Problem Solving in Arithmetic’, J. of Ed. Res. 38 (1944), 97–110.Google Scholar
  124. Johnson, P., ‘Mathematics as Human Communication’ in Lamon, W. E., Learning and the nature of mathematics (q.v.).Google Scholar
  125. Journal of Children's Mathematical Behaviour (Madison Project) (Appears somewhat infrequently: Vol. I, (1) (1971), (2) 1973, (3) 1975, (4) 1977). Many case studies of children's behaviour in the classroom. Considerable emphasis on the use of developing language and symbolism.Google Scholar
  126. Kane, R. B., ‘The Readability of Mathematical English’, J. of Research in Science Teaching 5 (1968), 296–298. Discusses differences between mathematical English (ME) and ordinary English (OE), and points out the inappropriateness of tests designed for OE being applied to ME tests to assess readability.Google Scholar
  127. Kane, R. B., ‘The Readability of Mathematics Textbooks Revisited’, Mathematics Teacher 63 (1970), 579–581. Discusses reasons why readability formulae are not a suitable measure of ME.Google Scholar
  128. Kaplan, H. W. and E., ‘Development of Word Meaning Through Verbal Context: An Experimental Study’, Journ. Psych. 29 (1950), 251–257.Google Scholar
  129. Keislar, E. R. and Stern, C., ‘Young Children's Use of Language in Inferential Behaviour’, J. of Research and Development in Education 3 (1969), 1, 15–29. (Reaction Paper by J. A. R. Wilson, 30–31). Experiments to test value of oral responding in young children.Google Scholar
  130. Keitel, C. and Otte, M., Das Lehrbuchproblem als Gegenstand der Lehrerausbilding, EPAS 1, IDM Bielefeld, 1977. Questions relating to textbooks. Good bibliography (58-mainly in German).Google Scholar
  131. Kennedy, M. L., ‘Young Children's Use of Written Symbolism to Solve Verbal Addition and Subtraction Problems’, J. Child. Math. Behaviour I(4) (1977), 122–134. How children operate with informal written symbolism. Operational competence in writing formal symbols not indicative of understanding.Google Scholar
  132. Klare, G. R., The Measurement of Readability, Iowa State University Press, 1963. A survey of common formulae. Jumbo bibliography.Google Scholar
  133. Krygowska, Z., ‘La texte mathématique dans l'enseignement’, Educ. Stud. Math. 2(3) (1969), 360–370. An analysis of (pedagogical) errors of presentation to be found in many 1960's ‘modern maths’ textbooks.Google Scholar
  134. Kulm, G., ‘Language Level and Information Content Measures in Mathematical English’, and ‘Language Level Applied to the Information Content of Technical Prose’, Purdue University, Indiana, 1974. Suggests using Halstead's formulae for computer languages to assess information content and language level of technical prose. Investigations suggest measures are more objective than readability tests, and may also permit assessment of expected learning rate.Google Scholar
  135. Kysilka, M. L., The Verbal Teaching Behaviors of Mathematics and Social Studies Teachers in Eighth and Eleventh Grades, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1970.Google Scholar
  136. Labov, W., ‘The Logic of Non-Standard English’, in Language and Poverty (Williams, F., ed.), Chicago, Markham, 1970.Google Scholar
  137. Lacey, P. A. and Weil, P. E., ‘Number, Reading, Language’, Language Arts 52(6) (1975), 776–82. The construction of exercises integrating mathematical concepts and reading development.Google Scholar
  138. Lakatos, I., Proofs and Refutations, London, Cambridge University Press, 1976. The discourse of conjecture and refutation.Google Scholar
  139. Lamanna, J. B., The Effect of Teacher Verbal Behaviour on Pupil Achievement in Problem Solving in Sixth Grade Mathematics, Ph.D. thesis, St. John's University, 1969.Google Scholar
  140. Lamon, W. E. (ed.), Learning and the Nature of Mathematics, Chicago, S.R.A., 1972. A collection of essays on mathematical education. Some, e.g., those by Henkin and Williams, being particularly concerned with language.Google Scholar
  141. Lawton, D., Social Class, Language and Education, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968. Review and reports of work done on socio-cultural factors affecting language learning and use in the context of education, psychological theories, and remedial language programmes.Google Scholar
  142. Linville, W. J., The Effects of Syntax and Vocabulary Upon the Difficulty of Verbal Arithmetic Problems with Fourth Grade Students, Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, 1970.Google Scholar
  143. Lörcher, G. A., ‘Mathematik als Fremdsprache’, in Reflektierte Schulpraxis 10(1) (1974), 1–11. An analysis of books used in the lower secondary school.Google Scholar
  144. Love, E. and Tahta, D., ‘Language Across the Curriculum: Mathematics’, Mathematics Teaching 79 (1977), 48–49. A series of ordered questions intended to stimulate further work.Google Scholar
  145. Lovell, K., Intellectual Growth and Understanding Mathematics, Math. Ed. Report, ERIC, 1971.Google Scholar
  146. Lunzer, E. A., Bell, A. E., and Shiu, C. M., The Acquisition of Some Mathematical Notions in Children of School Age, London, SSRC, 1976. Considers, inter alia, the transition from natural to mathematical language.Google Scholar
  147. Luria, A. R. and Yudovich, F. J., Speech and the Development of Mental Processes in the Child, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
  148. Lyda, W. J. and Duncan, F. M., ‘Quantitative Vocabulary and Problem Solving’, The Arithmetic Teacher 14 (1967), 289–291. Summary of factors isolated by previous research.Google Scholar
  149. Mackay, C. E., ‘Language in Maths’, Mathematics for the Least Able, 11 to 14, Newsletter No. 11, 3–4, (Feb. 1977). The Scottish Centre for Mathematics Science and Technical Education. Restricted code of slow learners v. elaborate code of teachers.Google Scholar
  150. Macnamara, J., ‘The Effects of Instruction in a Weaker Language’, J. of Social Issues 23(2) (1967), 120–134.Google Scholar
  151. Maier, H., ‘Zum Problem der Sprache in Mathematikunterricht’, Beitrage zum Mathematikunterricht, Schroedel, 1975, 110–114. Language in primary mathematics.Google Scholar
  152. Martin, N. et al., Understanding Children Talking, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1976a. Listening to children in the classroom. Some specifically mathematical examples.Google Scholar
  153. Martin, N. et al., Writing and Learning Across the Curriculum 11–16, London, Ward Lock Ed., 1976b.Google Scholar
  154. Mathematics Teaching, Periodical of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics (A.T.M. (q.v.)). This quarterly publication contains many articles on the use of language-particularly that used in the classroom. See also the Association's more informal publications: ATM Supplement and Recognitions.Google Scholar
  155. Matsud, Y. et al., ‘On the Pattern of Reasoning in Daily Lives’. Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. 31 (1977), 1–33. Discusses O'Brien's (etc.) work, and describes similar experiments in Japan-‘child's logic’ used more than ‘maths. logic’, but in some schools most children used ‘maths. logic’, ‘Child's logic’ not used exclusively, and patterns of thinking improved by instruction/training.Google Scholar
  156. Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N., Language and Perception, London, Cambridge University Press, 1976. On concepts and language.Google Scholar
  157. Mmari, G. R. V., ‘Tanzania's Experience in, and Efforts to Resolve, the Problem of Teaching Mathematics Through a Foreign Language’, in Accra Workshop Proceedings (q.v.). The problems of developing a workable language policy as the medium of instruction changes.Google Scholar
  158. Morgan, J., Affective Consequences for the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics of an Individualised Learning Programme, University of Stirling, 1977. An unusual ‘evaluative’ study with valuable comments concerning, for example, classroom dialogue, and textual language and format.Google Scholar
  159. Morris, R. W., ‘Linguistics Problems Encountered by Contemporary Curriculum Development Projects in Mathematics’, UNESCO, Paris, 1974. A wide-ranging comparative survey of problems arising in developing countries. Useful basic word list. (Preparatory paper for the Nairobi Conference.)Google Scholar
  160. Morrison, A. and McIntyre, D., Schools and Socialization, Harmondsworth, Pelican Books, 1971.Google Scholar
  161. Mugavero, A. C., ‘The Effect on Mathematical Achievement of Instruction in Four Language Skills’, Ed.D. thesis, Rochester, 1976. Specific language skills ((i) nontechnical vocabulary, (ii) technical vocabulary, (iii) identification of irrelevant words and phrases, (iv) ability to alter reading speed to adapt to material) might contribute to mathematical achievement.Google Scholar
  162. Munroe, M. E., The Language of Mathematics, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 1963. An investigation of ‘Mathese’.Google Scholar
  163. Nairobi Conference, Interactions Between Linguistics and Mathematical Education, UNESCO, Paris, 1974. Report of a symposium sponsored by UNESCO, CEDO and ICMI, Sept. 1–11, 1974. Particularly concerned with the problems of the developing countries in Anglophone Africa. Papers by Christiansen, Gay, Halliday, Morris, Strevens, etc. Bibliography (25).Google Scholar
  164. Nesher, P. A., From Ordinary Language to Arithmetical Language in the Primary Grades. (What does it mean to teach ‘2+3=5?’), Ed.D. thesis, Harvard, 1972. Connections between the language of arithmetic, ordinary language, and the experience of the primary school child.Google Scholar
  165. Nesher, P. and Teubal, E., ‘Verbal Cues as an Interfering Factor in Verbal Problem Solving’, Educ. Studies Math. 6 (1975), 41–51. The use of certain words which are always verbal cues results in an artificial mode of presentation of word-problems using specific and limited vocabulary-reflected in textbooks-connotations derived from problems, not experience with natural language. Key words found to influence choice of mathematical operation. Training should encourage revealing the underlying mathematical relations before giving a symbolic mathematical expression, and regardless of verbal formulation.Google Scholar
  166. Nicholson, A. R., ‘Mathematics and Language’, Mathematics in School 6 No. 5, (Nov. 1977), 32–34. Investigation of CSE pupils' understanding of mathematical terms by contextual questions requiring words to be filled in. Designed (unlike earlier paper by Otterburn and Nicholson) to test just understanding, and not ability as such.Google Scholar
  167. O'Brien, T. C., ‘Logical Thinking in Adolescents’, Educ. Studies Math. 4 (1972), 401–428. An investigation of the logical patterns used by children in Grades 9–12.Google Scholar
  168. O'Brien, T. C., ‘Logical Thinking in College Students’, Educ. Studies Math. 5 (1973). 71–79. Tests given to College students who had attended a course in formal logic-‘child's logic’ used often and consistently. Context effects still evident, favouring causal items (contrapositive). Inverse easier than converse.Google Scholar
  169. O'Brien, T. C., Shapiro, B. J., and Reali, N. C., ‘Logical Thinking-Language and Context’, Educ. Studies Math. 4 (1971), 201–219. Subjects (children in Grades 4–10) regard ‘If-then’ as meaning ‘If ... and only if ...’; ‘Child's Logic’-applied to ‘open’ schemes (inverse, converse)-partly due to underlying cognitive inability? Context may influence treatment of open schemes-probably more accurate on class inclusions than on causal items.Google Scholar
  170. Otani, Y., The influence of the mother tongue on achievement in mathematics, 1975, (available from ERIC). Criticism of IEA study on international achievement for its failure to consider influence of mother tongue (Japanese).Google Scholar
  171. Otterburn, M. K. and Nicholson, A. R., ‘The Language of (CSE) Mathematics’. Mathematics in School 5, No. 5, Nov. 1976, 18–20. Experimental report of tests applied to CSE pupils to evaluate their understanding of 36 words commonly used in maths. teaching and examining.Google Scholar
  172. Ottmann, A., ‘Kann mit Mathematik Sprache erlernt werden? Bericht über einen Schulversuch in Zwei “Internationalen Grundschulklassen”’. Die Fachgruppe, Ludwigsburg, 1975, 1, 11–14. Reports of approaches to combined mathematical and language training for the children of foreign workers.Google Scholar
  173. Paivio, A., ‘A Theoretical Analysis of the Role of Imagery in Learning and Memory’ in The Function and Nature of Imagery (Ed. Sheehan, P. W.), New York, Academic Press, 1972. A survey article which considers the role of verbal and imaginal codes.Google Scholar
  174. Palzere. D. E., An Analysis of the Effects of Verbalization and Non-Verbalization in the Learning of Mathematics, Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut, 1968.Google Scholar
  175. Peters, J., ‘Language and Mathematics Teaching in the Open University’, Teaching at a Distance 2, 31–34. Is traditional teaching language suitable for use in correspondence courses?Google Scholar
  176. Philp, H., ‘Mathematical Education in Developing Countries-Some Problems of Teaching and Learning’ in Exeter Congress Proceedings (q.v.). The effects of language on the learning of mathematics in Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar
  177. Piaget, J., The Language and Thought of the Child, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1926. ‘Why does the child talk?’ ‘What are the functions of language?’ The first of a most influential series of studies of the child's mind.Google Scholar
  178. Piaget, J., ‘How Children Form Mathematical Concepts’, Scientific American, Nov. 1953. Summary of Piaget's theory of development of mathematical concepts in children, with descriptions of the supporting experiments.Google Scholar
  179. Piaget, J., The Construction of Reality in the Child, Basic Books, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
  180. Piaget, J., Comments on Vygotsky's Critical Remarks Concerning ‘The Language and thought of the Child’ and ‘Judgement and Reasoning in the Child’, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  181. Piaget, J., Six Psychological Studies, London, University of London Press, 1968. Outline of the mental development of the child, including the relationship between language and thought, (I, II, III).Google Scholar
  182. Preston, M., ‘The Language of Early Mathematical Experience’, Mathematics in School 7(4) (1978), 31–32.Google Scholar
  183. Pribnow, J. R., ‘Why Johnny Can't “Read” Word Problems’, School Science and Mathematics 69 (1969), 591–598. Exemplifies an approach to problem-solving which involves recognising general procedures.Google Scholar
  184. Priesemann, G., ‘Die Fachsprachen des Unterrichts und das Problem der Verständigung’, Die höhere Schule, Düsseldorf 29 (1976), 3, 92–97. Specialised languages in school-language learning at all levels must remain in close relationship to human activities.Google Scholar
  185. Proctor, V. H. and Wright, E. M., Systematic Observation of Verbal Interaction as a Method of Comparing Mathematics Lessons, ED 003 827, June 1961, (available from ERIC).Google Scholar
  186. Reed, M. and Wainman, H., ‘Language Competence in Mathematics’, Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 9(1) (1978), 31–33. Asks whether particular problems exist in mathematics for those students who have to learn their discipline in a language which is not their mother tongue. One possible problem area is considered, the relationship between performance in mathematics and the understanding of mathematical text.Google Scholar
  187. Ré éduc. orthophon ‘Mathématique et langage’, 13(85, 86) (1975), 385–480, 483–562. Two issues of the French periodical devoted to a report of a conference held to discuss ‘mathematics and language’. Contains eleven papers and accounts of discussions.Google Scholar
  188. Reichenbach, H. and Walsch, W., ‘Einige, Probleme der Sprachschulung im Mathematikunterrich’, Zum logischen Denken im Mathematikunterricht, Berlin, VVW, 1975, 21–34. Interrelationship between language and logical thinking discussed and exemplified.Google Scholar
  189. Renwick, E. M., Children Learning Mathematics, Ilfracombe, Stockwell, 1963. A collection of anecdotes, with interpretative comments, concerning children's mathematical misconceptions, and emotional reactions to mathematics learning.Google Scholar
  190. Robinson, I., The New Grammarian's Funeral, London, Cambridge University Press, 1978. A critique of Chomsky's views of language.Google Scholar
  191. Rogers, S. (ed.), Children and Language, London, Oxford University Press, 1975. A collection of papers concerning language in relation to society, thinking, meaning and the environment.Google Scholar
  192. Rosen, C. and Rosen, H., The Language of Primary School Children, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar
  193. Rosen, H., Language and Class. A Critical Look at the Theories of Basil Bernstein, Bristol, Falling Wall Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  194. Rotman, B., Mathematics as Language: An Essay in Semiotics, (typed notes) Bristol University, n.d. A resumé of the work of Saussure, Peirce and Jakobson and an attempt to apply their ideas to mathematics.Google Scholar
  195. Sapir, E., Language, London, Rupert Hart-Davies, 1963.Google Scholar
  196. Skemp, R. R., The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1971. Outlines the theory of schematic learning, and describes aspects of learning mathematics-symbolisation, imagery, emotional factors-as they relate to this. Part B is concerned with presenting some fundamental mathematical ideas, based on theory of Part A.Google Scholar
  197. Skemp, R. R., ‘Reflective Intelligence, and the Use of Symbols’, in Chapman, L. R. (q.v.).Google Scholar
  198. Skemp, R. R., ‘Relational Mathematics and Instrumetal Mathematics-Some Further Thoughts’ University of Warwick, 1977.Google Scholar
  199. Smedslund, J., ‘Development of Concrete Transitivity of Length in Children’, Child Dev., 34(2) (1963), 389–405.Google Scholar
  200. Smedslund, J., ‘The Acquisition of Transitivity of Weight in Five to Seven-year old Children’, J. of Genetic Psych. 102 (1963b), 245–255.Google Scholar
  201. Smith, E. B., Goodman, K. S., and Meredith, R., Language and Thinking in the Elementary School, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
  202. Smith, F., ‘The Readability of Sixth Grade Word Problems’, School Science and Mathematics 71 (1971), 559–562. Dale-Chall formula applied to verbal problems aimed at 6th grade students.Google Scholar
  203. Smith, K. J. and Heddens, J. W., ‘The Readability of Experimental Mathematics Materials’, The Arithmetic Teacher 11 (1964), 391–394. Brief outline of readability tests applied to various mathematics texts, finding that readability is generally inconsistent in a text and under-estimated by publishers/authors.Google Scholar
  204. Steffe, L. P. (ed.), Research on Mathematical Thinking of Young Children, NCTM, 1975. General references to the development of linguistic and mathematical abilities. See, for example, the paper by Steffe and Carey.Google Scholar
  205. Stenhouse, L., An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development, London, Heinemann Educational, 1975.Google Scholar
  206. Stern, C., ‘Acquisition of Problem-Solving Strategies in Young Children and its Relation to Verbalisation’, J. of Ed. Psych. 58 (1967), 245–252.Google Scholar
  207. Stones, E., Readings in Educational Psychology, London, Methuen, 1970. A selection of papers and abstracts (usually edited and abridged). Relevant authors include Liublinskaya, Carroll, Sapir, Luria, Vigotsky, Piaget and Gagné. (Useful bibliographies.)Google Scholar
  208. Strain, L. B., ‘Children's Literature: an aid in mathematics instruction’, The Arithmetic Teacher 16 (1969), 451–455. Advocates the use of children's literature not only for motivation of mathematics learning, but also as an aid to concept formation and development of linguistic skills-a stimulation to enquiry and discussion. Includes selection of examples.Google Scholar
  209. Strevens, P., ‘What is Linguistics and How May it Help the Mathematics Teacher?’, UNESCO, Paris, 1974. An introductory paper prepared for the 1974 Nairobi Conference.Google Scholar
  210. Stubbs, M., Language, Schools and Classrooms, London, Methuen, 1976. Discusses sociolinguistic aspects of classroom environment, with reference to some major theories and their shortcomings. Stresses complexity of the real situations, and advocates practical, well-recorded research.Google Scholar
  211. Sutherland, J., ‘Aspects of Problem Solving’, Brit. J. of Ed. Psych. 11 (1941), 215–222 and 12 (1942), 35–46. An attempt to study the effect of vocabulary on efficiency in solving problems.Google Scholar
  212. Sweet, A., ‘Children Need Talk’, Mathematics Teaching 58 (1972), 40–43. Teach mathematical concepts by verbalisation of concrete examples. Care in use of language-precision may avoid confusion. Recording badly is worse than no recording.Google Scholar
  213. Taiwo, C. O., ‘Primary School Mathematics in an African Society’, London, Commonwealth Secretariat, 1968. General description of Yoruba culture and education in Nigeria, with passing mention of language problems. A paper prepared for the Commonwealth Conference on Mathematics in Schools, Trinidad, 1968. See also ‘Accra’.Google Scholar
  214. Takai, K., ‘Relations between Language and the Teaching of Numbers’. Paper presented at the meeting of Canadian and Japanese Mathematics Educators, University of Alberta, August 1975. Describes Japanese number system(s), and teaching of multiplication.Google Scholar
  215. Thom, R., ‘Modern Mathematics: Does it Exist?’ in Exeter Congress Proceedings (q.v.). Valuable ideas on language, grammar and meaning within mathematics.Google Scholar
  216. Thom, R., ‘“Modern” Mathematics: An Educational and Philosophic Error’, Amer. Scientist 59 (6) (Dec., 1971), 695–699. On the hazards of mixing distinct semantic fields.Google Scholar
  217. Thomas, G. R., ‘Precision, Accuracy, and Other Ambiguities’, The Mathematics Teacher 58 (1965), 509–511. Ambiguity of meaning implied by mathematician's or scientist's uses of words ‘precision’, ‘accuracy’, to mean ‘uncertainty’, ‘no uncertainty’.Google Scholar
  218. Thornton, E. C. B., ‘The Power of Words’, Mathematics Teaching 38 (1967), 6–7. Confusion arises in manipulating arithmetic symbols through use of misleading, rote phrases, (e.g., “cancelling”, “turning upside down”, “taking out the brackets”, etc.) which are not sufficiently informal to be distinguished from formal operations. A mathematical explanation would be preferable. Other phrases: “into” and “turning it into”, “taking ... as”, etc.Google Scholar
  219. Thornton, E. C. B., ‘Any must go’, in Mathematical Reflections, (see under A.T.M.). Discusses the uses made of logical connectives and quatifiers, with some exemplary proofs, and elucidates the logically inconsistent use of the word ‘any’ within such proofs.Google Scholar
  220. Toda, K. et al., ‘Problems in Mathematical Symbolism-The First, 1. Mathematics and Symbolism, 2. Synonyms’, Reports of Mathematical Education, J.S.M.E. VI (1963), 25–36. Relationship between concepts and symbolism.Google Scholar
  221. Trevino, B. A. G., An Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Bilingual Program in the Teaching of Mathematics in the Primary Grades, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, 1968.Google Scholar
  222. Trueblood, C. R., ‘Promoting Problem-Solving Skills Through Non-Verbal Problems’, The Arithmetic Teacher 16 (1969), 7–9. Suggests that illustrated problems, where pupils discuss a verbal form, permit development of solving skills and verbalisation skills and hence may overcome reading difficulties. Greater interest if such problems are created by pupils. Examples are given.Google Scholar
  223. UNESCO-UNICEF (Asian Region), Thé Development of Science and Mathematics Concepts in Children, UNESCO, Bangkok, 1972. Report of a conference held in Bangkok. Although only indirectly concerned with language, the problem is almost everywhere implicit.Google Scholar
  224. Vollrath, H.-J., ‘The Understanding of Similarity and Shape in Classifying Tasks’, Educ. Studies Math. 8 (1977), 211–224. Description of experimental procedure of classifying tests which illustrate that colloquial and mathematical usage of a word do not coincide. Emphasis on acquiring vocabulary was a possible source of further confusion.Google Scholar
  225. Vygotsky, L. S., Thought and Language, New York: MIT Press and John Wiley, 1962. A psychological study of the development of language in children: contrasts with Piagetian ideas.Google Scholar
  226. Wallace, J. G., Concept Growth and the Education of the Child. A Survey of Research on Conceptualisation. Slough, NFER, 1965. To what extent is the learning of concepts facilitated by the use of verbal labels?Google Scholar
  227. Wallace, J. G., An Enquiry into the Development of Concepts of Number in Young Children Involving a Comparison of Verbal and Non-Verbal Methods of Assessment and Acceleration, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol, 1967.Google Scholar
  228. Weigand, R. B., ‘Readability of Mathematics Textbooks’, J. of Reading, 11 (1967), 201–4.Google Scholar
  229. Weiner, S. L., ‘On the Development of More and Less’, J. of Exp. Ch. Psych. 17(2) (1974), 271–287. Language and mathematical development amongst pre-school children.Google Scholar
  230. Whitehead, A. N., An Introduction to Mathematics, London, Oxford University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
  231. Whorf, B. L., Language, Thought and Reality, New York, MIT Press and Wiley, 1956. Collected writings which cover ideas of theoretical linguistic analysis, language in psychology of mind, and specific examples from South American languages which are analysed for structure and meaning of English.Google Scholar
  232. Williams, J. D., ‘Some Peculiarities of Calculative Thinking and Their Consequences’, in Lamon, W. E. (ed.), Learning and the Nature of Mathematics (q.v.).Google Scholar
  233. Wilkinson, A. M., The Foundations of Language, London, Oxford University Press, 1971. The interaction of language and social learning.Google Scholar
  234. Wilkinson, A. M., Language and Education, London, Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  235. Wilmon, B., ‘Reading in the Content Area: A “New Math” Terminology List for the Primary Grades’, Elementary English 48 (1971), 463–471. Suggests that specialised vocabulary is important for mathematics readability, and reviews reports of compilations of word lists.Google Scholar
  236. Wittgenstein, L. J. J., Philosophical Investigations, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1958. Meaning, knowing, understanding. “Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language”. (See also: Hardwick, C. S., Language Learning in Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy, The Hague, Mouton, 1971.)Google Scholar
  237. Wode, D., ‘Mathematikunterricht und Spracherziehung’, Der Mathematikunterricht, 22 (1976), 1, 44–64. Need for more precise use of language in primary schools. One of five papers in a special issue devoted to ‘logic and language’.Google Scholar
  238. Wrigley, J., ‘The Factorial Nature of Ability in Elementary Mathematics’, B. J. of Ed. Psych. 28, 1958, 61–78. The relationship between verbal and mathematical abilities. (Wrigley's findings have met with opposition-see Aiken, 1972.)Google Scholar
  239. Young, A., Outline of a Project for Introducing Bilingual Education into Basic Schools in Jamaica, Kingston, Jamaica, 1977.Google Scholar
  240. Zaslavsky, C., Africa Counts: Number and Pattern in African Culture, Boston, Mass., Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, 1973. Historical and cultural descriptions of mathematical concepts in African countries, with studies of Nigerian and East African concepts in particular.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Austin
    • 1
  • A. G. Howson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonEngland

Personalised recommendations