Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 62–68 | Cite as

Tactile discrimination of thickness

  • K. T. John
  • A. W. Goodwin
  • I. Darian-Smith
Article

Summary

The ability of human subjects to discriminate plane metal plates of different thickness was measured using a forced-choice paradigm. The plates, made by electroplating a thin layer of copper onto flat brass shims, were gripped between the thumb and the index finger. Subjects were presented with either 2 standard plates (0.2 mm thick), or a standard plate and a test plate that was slightly thicker, and were required to state which alternative had occurred. When the edges of the plates could not be touched, a difference in thickness of about 0.075 mm could be discriminated. Surprisingly, when the edges were included in the grip, performance did not improve. All hypotheses of strategies used by the subjects required them to sense the angles of the finger joints with a precision of about 0.1°.

Key words

Thickness discrimination Finger position Precision grip Proprioception Sensori-motor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aniss AM, Gandevia SC, Milne RJ (1988) Changes in perceived heaviness and motor commands produced by cutaneous reflexes in man. J Physiol (Lond) 397:113–126Google Scholar
  2. Backhouse KM, Catton WT (1954) An experimental study of the functions of the lumbrical muscles in the human hand. J Anat 88:133–141Google Scholar
  3. Bair RR, Swalheim DA (1953) High efficiency cyanide copper. In: Gray AG (ed) Modern electroplating. John Wiley, New York, pp 213–225Google Scholar
  4. Browne K, Lee J, Ring PA (1954) The sensation of passive movement at the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe in man. J Physiol (Lond) 126:448–458Google Scholar
  5. Burgess PR, Mei J, Tuckett RP, Horch KW, Ballinger CM, Poulos DA (1983) The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations. J Neurosci 3:1572–1585Google Scholar
  6. Burke D, Gandevia SC, Macefield G (1988) Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J Physiol (Lond) 402:347–361Google Scholar
  7. Devanandan MS, Ghosh S, John KT (1983) A quantitative study of muscle spindles and tendon organs in some intrinsic muscles of the hand in the bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata). Anat Rec 207:263–266Google Scholar
  8. Dietze AG (1961) Kinaesthetic discrimination: the difference limen for finger span. J Psychol 51:165–168Google Scholar
  9. Evans GB, Howarth E (1966) The effect of grip-tension on tactile-kinaesthetic judgement of width. Quart J Exp Psychol 18:275–277Google Scholar
  10. Ferrel WR, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1987) The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol (Lond) 386:63–71Google Scholar
  11. Ferrel WR, Smith A (1988) Position sense at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the human index finger. J Physiol (Lond) 399:49–61Google Scholar
  12. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1976) Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol (Lond) 260:387–407Google Scholar
  13. Gaydos HF (1958) Sensitivity in the judgment of size by fingerspan. Am J Psychol 71:557–562Google Scholar
  14. Hulliger M, Nordh E, Thelin A-E, Vallbo AB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 291:233–249Google Scholar
  15. Johansson RS, LaMotte RH (1983) Tactile detection thresholds for a single asperity on an otherwise smooth surface. Somatosens Res 1:21–31Google Scholar
  16. John KT, Devanandan MS (1988) Sensory innervation and motor properties of the lumbrical muscles in the primate hand. Neurosci Lett 30:S81Google Scholar
  17. Johnson KO (1980) Sensory discrimination: decision process. J Neurophysiol 43:1771–1792Google Scholar
  18. Landsmeer JMF (1976) Atlas of anatomy of the hand. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Long C, Brown ME (1964) Electromyographic kinesiology of the hand: muscles moving the long finger. J Bone Jt Surg 46A: 1683–1706Google Scholar
  20. McCloskey DI (1978) Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev 58:763–820Google Scholar
  21. McFadden D (1970) Three computational versions of proportion correct for use in forced-choice experiments. Percept Psychophys 8:336–342Google Scholar
  22. Noth J, Matthews HR, Friedemann H-H (1984) Long latency reflex force of human finger muscles in response to imposed sinusoidal movements. Exp Brain Res 55:317–324Google Scholar
  23. Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46:1192–1203Google Scholar
  24. Provins KA (1958) The effect of peripheral nerve block on the appreciation and execution of finger movements. J Physio1 (Lond) 143:55–67Google Scholar
  25. Stevens SS, Stone G (1959) Finger span: ratio scale, category scale, and jnd scale. J Exp Psychol 57:91–95Google Scholar
  26. Vallbo AB (1970) Discharge patterns in human muscle spindle afferents during isometric voluntary contractions. Acta Physiol Scand 80:552–566Google Scholar
  27. Vallbo AB, Johansson RS (1984) Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Human Neurobiol 3:3–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. T. John
    • 1
  • A. W. Goodwin
    • 1
  • I. Darian-Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations