Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 93, Issue 7, pp 1011–1016 | Cite as

Molecular markers associated with seed weight in two soybean populations

  • M. A. R. Mian
  • M. A. Bailey
  • J. P. Tamulonis
  • E. R. Shipe
  • T. E. CarterJr.
  • W. A. Parrott
  • D. A. Ashley
  • R. S. Hussey
  • H. R. Boerma
Article

Abstract

Seed weight (SW) is a component of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., seed yield, as well as an important trait for food-type soybeans. Two soybean populations, 120 F4-derived lines of ‘Young’xPI416937 (Pop1) and 111 F2-derived lines of PI97100x‘Coker 237’ (Pop2), were mapped with RFLP makers to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) conditioning SW across environments and populations. The genetic map of Pop1 consisted of 155 loci covering 973 cM, whereas Pop2 involved 153 loci and covered 1600 cM of map distance. For Pop1, the phenotypic data were collected from Plains, GA., Windblow, N.C., and Plymouth, N.C., in 1994. For Pop2, data were collected from Athens, GA., in 1994 and 1995, and Blackville, S.C., in 1995. Based on single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), seven and nine independent loci were associated with SW in Pop1 and Pop2, respectively. Together the loci explained 73% of the variability in SW in Pop1 and 74% in Pop2. Transgressive segregation occurred among the progeny in both populations. The marker loci associated with SW were highly consistent across environments and years. Two QTLs on linkage group (LG) F and K were located at similar genomic regions in both populations. The high consistency of QTLs across environments indicates that effective marker-assisted selection is feasible for soybean SW.

Key words

Soybean Glycine max Seed weight RFLP QTL Markers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajmone MP, Monfredini G, Ludwing WF (1995) In an elite cross of maize a major quantitative trait locus controls one fourth of the genetic variation for grain yield. Theor Appl Genet 90:415–424Google Scholar
  2. Brim CA (1973) Quantitative genetics and breeding. In: Caldwell BE (ed) Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. Agronomy 16:155–186Google Scholar
  3. Burris JS, Edje OT, Wahab AH (1973) Effect of seed size on seedling performance in soybeans. II. Seedling growth and photosynthesis and field performance. Crop Sci 13:207–210Google Scholar
  4. Burton JW, Brim CA, Young MF (1987) Registration of Young soybean. Crop Sci 27:1093Google Scholar
  5. Christian AF, Menancio-Hautea DI, Danesh D, Young ND (1992) Evidence for orthologous seed-weight genes in cowpea and mung bean based on RFLP mapping. Genetics 132:841–846Google Scholar
  6. Doerge RW, Zeng Z-B, Weir BS (1994) Statistical issues in the search for genes affecting quantitative traits in populations. Proc Joint Plant Breed Symp Sen Am Soc Hort Sci and Crop Sci Soc Am, pp-15–26Google Scholar
  7. Dudley JW (1993) Molecular markers in plant improvement: manipulation of genes affecting quantitative traits. Crop Sci 33:660–668Google Scholar
  8. Holloway JL, Knapp SJ (1993) GMendel 3.0 Users Guide. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong BH, Park MW, Kim SD, Choe BH, Hong EH, Ha YW (1994) Breeding strategy for quality improvement and diversity in an upland crop. Korean J Breed 26:16–35Google Scholar
  10. Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP maps. Genetics 121:185–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, and Newburg L (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SH, Bailey MA, Mian MAR, Carter, Jr. TE, Ashley DA, Hussey RS, Parrott WA, Boerma HR (1996a) Molecular markers associated with soybean plant height, lodging, and maturity across locations. Crop Sci 36:728–735Google Scholar
  13. Lee SH, Bailey MA, Mian MAR, Carter, nJr. TE, Ashley DA, Hussey RS, Parrott WA, Boerma HR (1996b) Identification of quantitative trait loci for plant height, lodging, and maturity in a soybean population segregating for growth habit. Theor Appl Genet 92:516–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander ES (1992) Mapping genes controlling quantitative traits with MAPMAKER/QTL. Whitehead Institute Tech Rep, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansur LM, Lark KG, Kross H, Oliveira A (1993) Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci for reproductive, morphological, and seed traits of soybean (Glycine max L.). Theor Appl Genet 86:907–913Google Scholar
  16. Mian MAR, Bailey MA, Ashley DA, Wells R, Carter Jr. TE, Parrott WA, Boerma HR (1996) Molecular markers associated with water-use efficiency and leaf ash in soybean. Crop Sci 36:1252–1257Google Scholar
  17. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127:181–197Google Scholar
  18. Paterson AH, Lin Y-R, Li Z, Schertz K, Doebley J, Pinson S, Liu S-C,Stansel J, Irvine J (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269:1714–1718Google Scholar
  19. SAS (1988) SAS users guide. Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Shoemaker RC, Specht JE (1995) Integration of the soybean molecular and classical genetic linkage groups. Crop Sci 35:436–446Google Scholar
  21. Shoemaker RC, Polzin K, Specht J, Brummer EC, Olson T, Young N, Concibido V, Wilcox J, Tamulonis JP, Kochert G, Boerma HR (1997) Genome duplication in soybean. Genetics 144(1):329–338Google Scholar
  22. Sloane RJ, Patterson RP, Carter, Jr TE (1990) Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci 30:118–123Google Scholar
  23. Smith TJ, Camper Jr HM (1975) Effect of seed size on soybean performance. Agron J 67:681–684Google Scholar
  24. Stam P (1993) Construction of integrated genetic maps by means of a new computer package: Join Map. Plant J 3:739–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanksley SD (1993) Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27:205–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. R. Mian
    • 1
  • M. A. Bailey
    • 1
  • J. P. Tamulonis
    • 1
  • E. R. Shipe
    • 2
  • T. E. CarterJr.
    • 3
  • W. A. Parrott
    • 1
  • D. A. Ashley
    • 1
  • R. S. Hussey
    • 4
  • H. R. Boerma
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.USDA-ARS, Dep. of Crop ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  5. 5.Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.JohnstonUSA

Personalised recommendations