Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 308–318 | Cite as

Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories

  • J. J. Collins
  • C. J. De Luca


A new conceptual and theoretical framework for studying the human postural control system is introduced. Mathematical techniques from statistical mechanics are developed and applied to the analysis and interpretation of stabilograms. This work was based on the assumption that the act of maintaining an erect posture could be viewed, in part, as a stochastic process. Twenty-five healthy young subjects were studied under quiet-standing conditions. Center-of-pressure (COP) trajectories were analyzed as one-dimensional and two dimensional random walks. This novel approach led to the extraction of repeatable, physiologically meaningful parameters from stabilograms. It is shown that although individual stabilograms for a single subject were highly variable and random in appearance, a consistent, subject-specific pattern emerged with the generation of averaged stabilogram-diffusion plots (mean square COP displacement vs time interval). In addition, significant inter-subject differences were found in the calculated results. This suggests that the steady-state behavior of the control mechanisms involved in maintaining erect posture can be quite variable even amongst a population of age-matched, anthropometrically similar, healthy individuals. These posturographic analyses also demonstrated that COP trajectories could be modelled as fractional Brownian motion and that at least two control systems — a shortterm mechanism and a long-term mechanism — were operating during quiet standing. More specifically, the present results suggest that over short-term intervals open-loop control schemes are utilized by the postural control system, whereas over long-term intervals closed-loop control mechanisms are called into play. This work strongly supports the position that much can be learned about the functional organization of the postural control system by studying the steady-state behavior of the human body during periods of undisturbed stance.

Key words

Postural control Open-loop control Closed-loop control Random walk Human 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartol TM, Land BR, Salpeter EE, Salpeter MM (1991) Monte Carlo simulation of miniature endplate current generation in the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Biophys J 59: 1290–1307Google Scholar
  2. Beckley DJ, Bloem BR, Remler MP, Roos RAC, Van Dijk JG (1991) Long latency postural responses are functionally modified by cognitive set. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81: 353–358Google Scholar
  3. De Luca CJ, LeFever RS, McCue MP, Xenakis AP (1982) Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions. J Physiol (Lond) 329: 129–142Google Scholar
  4. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bacher M, Gompf B (1984) Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebellar diseases. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 57: 134–142Google Scholar
  5. Diener HC, Horak FB, Nashner LM (1988) Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 59: 1888–1905Google Scholar
  6. Diener HC, Horak F, Stelmach G, Guschlbauer B, Dichgans J (1991) Direction and amplitude precuing has no effect on automatic posture responses. Exp Brain Res 84: 219–223Google Scholar
  7. Dietz V (1992) Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. Physiol Rev 72: 33–69Google Scholar
  8. Dietz V, Trippel M, Discher M, Horstmann GA (1991) Compensation of human stance perturbations: selection of the appropriate electromyographic pattern. Neurosci Lett 126: 71–74Google Scholar
  9. Einstein A (1905) Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann Phys 322: 549–560Google Scholar
  10. Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerstein GL, Mandelbrot B (1964) Random walk models for the spike activity of a single neuron. Biophys J 4: 41–68Google Scholar
  13. Gorse D, Taylor JG (1990) A general model of stochastic neural processing. Biol Cybern 63: 299–306Google Scholar
  14. Hasan SS, Lichtenstein MJ, Shiavi RG (1990) Effect of loss of balance on biomechanics platform measures of sway: influence of stance and a method for adjustment. J Biomech 23: 783–789Google Scholar
  15. Holden AV (1976) Models of the stochastic activity of neurones. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Horak FB, Diener HC, Nashner LM (1989) Influence of central set on human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 62: 841–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55: 1369–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC (1990) Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 82: 167–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirby RL, Price NA, MacLeod DA (1987) The influence of foot position on standing balance. J Biomech 20: 423–427Google Scholar
  20. Longtin A, Bulsara A, Moss F (1991) Time-interval sequences in bistable systems and the noise-induced transmission of information by sensory neurons. Phys Rev Lett 67: 656–659Google Scholar
  21. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Mandelbrot BB, van Ness JW (1968) Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev 10: 422–437zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Montroll EW, Lebowitz JL (eds) (1987) Fluctuation phenomena. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore SP, Rushmer DS, Windus SL, Nashner LM (1988) Human automatic postural responses: responses to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions. Exp Brain Res 73: 648–658Google Scholar
  25. Nashner LM (1971) A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion. Acta Otolaryngol 72: 429–436Google Scholar
  26. Nashner LM (1972) Vestibular postural control model. Kybernetik 10: 106–110Google Scholar
  27. Nashner LM (1977) Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Exp Brain Res 30: 13–24Google Scholar
  28. Norré ME, Forrez G, Beckers A (1987) Posturography measuring instability in vestibular dysfunction in the elderly. Age Ageing 16: 89–93Google Scholar
  29. Peretto P (1984) Collective properties of neural networks: a statistical physics approach. Biol Cybern 50: 51–62Google Scholar
  30. Saupe D (1988) Algorithms for random fractals. In: Peitgen H-O, Saupe D (eds) The science of fractal images. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 71–136Google Scholar
  31. Shlesinger MF, West BJ (eds) (1984) Random walks and their applications in the physical and biological sciences. American Institute of Physics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull 86: 420–428Google Scholar
  33. Sompolinsky H (1988) Statistical mechanics of neural networks. Phys Today Dec 70–80Google Scholar
  34. Tuckwell HC (1989) Stochastic processes in the neurosciences. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  35. Voss RF (1988) Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In: Peitgen H-O, Saupe D (eds) The science of fractal images. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 21–70Google Scholar
  36. Woollacott MH, von Hosten C, Rösblad B (1988) Relation between muscle response onset and body segmental movements during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res 72: 593–604Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Collins
    • 1
  • C. J. De Luca
    • 1
  1. 1.NeuroMuscular Research Center and Department of Biomedical EngineeringBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations