Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 90, Issue 1, pp 29–39 | Cite as

The currents that flow in the somatosensory cortex during the direct cortical response

  • G. W. Harding
Article

Summary

A current-flow and current-source-density analysis of the sensory evoked response (SER) and the direct cortical response (DCR) in the somatosensory cortex of rats was performed to determine the origin of these potentials. The SER was found to originate in layers II and III, as in cats, with a single excitatory neuronal circuit component. The DCR, on the other hand, has five components, three inhibitory and two excitatory. The activation and magnitude of these components vary with stimulus strength and frequency. During the second and fourth ms of the response, two inhibitory currents flow in layers V and VI; 2 ms later, excitatory current flows in layers II and III. This excitatory current appears to be the same one involved in the SER. Five ms later, the superficial excitatory current is replaced by an inhibitory one in the neighborhood of the DCR's negative peak. At strong stimulus strengths, this is followed by an excitatory current in layer V. The early inhibitory and excitatory components step up through layers upper-VI, V and III over time, implying that inhibition followed by excitation moves upward through cortex. The currents associated with the DCR in somatosensory cortex are compared with those for the DCR in motor and association cortex.

Key words

Direct Cortical Response Sensory Evoked Response Current Source Density Somatosensory Cortex Rat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian ED (1936) The spread of activity in the cerebral cortex. J Physiol 88:127–161Google Scholar
  2. Amassian VE, Waller HH, Macey JJr (1964) Neural mechanisms of the primary somatosensory evoked potential. Ann NY Acad Sci 112:5–32Google Scholar
  3. Barth DS, Sutherling W (1988) Current source-density and neuromagnetic analysis of the direct cortical response in rat cortex. Brain Res 450:280–294Google Scholar
  4. Barth DS, Di S, Baumgartner C (1989) Laminar cortical interactions during epileptic spikes studied with principal component analysis and physiological modeling. Brain Res 484:13–35Google Scholar
  5. Bishop GH, Clare MH (1953) Responses of cortex to direct electrical stimuli applied at different depths. J Neurophysiol 16:1–19Google Scholar
  6. Chang H-T (1951) Dendritic potential of cortical neurons produced by direct electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 14:1–21Google Scholar
  7. Chen Z, Towe AL (1984) Cerebral response of medullary pyramid stimulation in the rabbit. Brain Behav Evol 25:175–186Google Scholar
  8. Di S, Baumgartner C, Barth DS (1990) Laminar analysis of extracellular field potentials in rat vibrissa/barrel cortex. J Neurophysiol 63:832–840Google Scholar
  9. Eidelberg E, Jenkins I (1966) Organization of somatic sensory mechanisms in the macaque cerebral cortex. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol 21:452–460Google Scholar
  10. Gerard RW, Marshal WH, Saul LJ (1933) Cerebral action potentials. Proc Soc Exp Biol NY 30:1123Google Scholar
  11. Goldring S, O'Leary JL (1960) Pharmacological dissolution of evoked cortical potentials. Fed Proc 19:612–618Google Scholar
  12. Goldring S, Jerva MJ, Holmes TG, O'Leary JL, Shields JR (1961a) Direct responses of human cerebral cortex. Arch Neurol 4:590–598Google Scholar
  13. Goldring S, O'Leary JL, Holmes TG, Jerva MJ (1961b) Direct response of isolated cerebral cortex of cat. J Neurophysiol 24:633–650Google Scholar
  14. Hand PJ, Morrison AR (1970) Thalmocortical projections from the ventrobasal complex to somatic sensory areas I and II. Exp Neurol 26:291–308Google Scholar
  15. Harding GW (1991) A method for eliminating the stimulus artifact from digital recordings of the direct cortical response. Comput Biomed Res 24:183–195Google Scholar
  16. Harding GW, Stogsdill RM, Towe AL (1979) Relative effects of pentobarbital and chloralose on the responsiveness of neurons in sensorimotor cerebral cortex of the domestic cat. Neuroscience 4:369–378Google Scholar
  17. Harris FA (1980) Wide-field neurons in somatosensory thalamus of domestic cats under barbiturate anesthesia. Exp Neurol 68:27–49Google Scholar
  18. Harrison TA, Towe AL (1986) Antidromic response to medullary pyramid stimulation in rats and its relation to that in cats. Brain Behav Evol 29:143–161Google Scholar
  19. Jabbur SJ, Towe AL (1961) Analysis of the antidromic cortical response following stimulation of the medullary pyramids. J Physiol 155:148–160Google Scholar
  20. Jones EG, Powell TPS (1970) An electron microscopic study of the laminar pattern and mode of termination of afferent fibre pathways in the somatic sensory cortex of the cat. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 257:45–62Google Scholar
  21. Landau WM (1956) An analysis of the cortical response to antidromic pyramidal tract stimulation in the cat. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 8:445–456Google Scholar
  22. Landau WM, Bishop GH, Clare MH (1965) Site of excitation in stimulation of motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 28:1206–1222Google Scholar
  23. Landau WM, Clare MH (1956) A note on the characteristic response pattern in primary sensory projection cortex of the cat following a synchronous afferent volley. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 8:457–464Google Scholar
  24. Merlis JK (1965) Excitability cycle of the direct cortical response studied with minimal stimuli and response averaging. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 18:118–123Google Scholar
  25. Mingrino S, Coxe WS, Katz R, Goldring S (1963) The direct cortical response: associated events in pyramid and muscle during development of movement and after-discharge. In: Moruzzi G, Fessard A, Jasper HH (eds) Progress in brain research, Vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 241–257Google Scholar
  26. Mitzdorf U (1985) Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol Rev 65:37–100Google Scholar
  27. Mitzdorf U, Singer W (1978) Prominent excitatory pathways in the cat visual cortex (A 17 and A 18): a current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res 33:371–394Google Scholar
  28. Mitzdorf U, Singer W (1980) Monocular activation of visual cortex in normal and monocularly deprived cats: an analysis of evoked potentials. J Physiol 304:203–220Google Scholar
  29. Müller-Preuss P, Mitzdorf U (1984) Functional anatomy of the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex: current source density analysis of click-evoked potentials. Hear Res 16:133–142Google Scholar
  30. Nicholson C (1973) Theoretical analysis of field potentials in anisotropic ensembles of neuronal elements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 20:278–288Google Scholar
  31. O'Leary JL, Goldring S (1960) Slow cortical potentials Their origin and contribution to seizure discharge. Epilepsia 1:561–574Google Scholar
  32. Ochs S, Clark FJ (1968a) Tetrodotoxin analysis of direct cortical responses. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 24:101–107Google Scholar
  33. Ochs S, Clark FJ (1968b) Interaction of direct cortical responses — a possible dendritic site of inhibition. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 24:108–115Google Scholar
  34. Patton HD, Amassian VE (1954) Single and multiple unit analysis of cortical stage of pyramidal tract activation. J Neurophysiol 17:345–364Google Scholar
  35. Petsche H, Pockberger H, Rappelsberger R (1982) Current source density study of epileptic phenomena and the morphology of the rabbit's striate cortex. In: Klee MR, Lux HD, Speckmann EJ (eds) Physiology and pharmacology of epileptogenic phenomena. Raven Press, New York, pp 53–63Google Scholar
  36. Purpura DP, Grundfest H (1956) Nature of dendritic potentials and synaptic mechanisms in cerebral cortex of cat. J Neurophysiol 19:573–595Google Scholar
  37. Rappelsberger P, Pockberger H, Petsche H (1982) The contribution of the cortical layers to the generation of the EEG: field potentials and current analysis in the rabbit's visual cortex. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 53:254–269Google Scholar
  38. Satterthwaite WR, Burnham JA, Towe AL (1978) Wide-field conditioning effects on small-field neurons in the posterior sigmoid gyrus of domestic cats. Exp Neurol 60:603–613Google Scholar
  39. Stone TW (1972) Cortical responses to pyramidal tract stimulation in the rat. Exp Neurol 35:492–502Google Scholar
  40. Strick PL, Sterling P (1974) Synaptic termination of afferents from the ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus in the cat motor cortex. A light and electron microscope study. J Comp Neurol 153:77–106Google Scholar
  41. Suzuki H, Taira N (1958) Regional differences of the direct cortical response. Jpn J Physiol 8:365–377Google Scholar
  42. Towe AL (1966) On the nature of the primary evoked response. Exp Neurol 15:113–139Google Scholar
  43. Towe AL, Mann MD, Harding GW (1981) On the currents that flow during the strychnine spike. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 51:306–327Google Scholar
  44. Towe AL, Tyner CF, Nyquist JK (1976) Facilitatory and inhibitory modulation of wide-field neuron activity in postcruciate cerebral cortex of the domestic cat. Exp Neurol 50:734–756Google Scholar
  45. Towe AL, Whitehorn D, Nyquist JK (1968) Differential activity among wide-field neurons of the cat postcruciate cerebral cortex. Exp Neurol 20:497–521Google Scholar
  46. Wilkinson L (1988) SYSTAT and SYGRAPH: the system for statistics. Evanston, IL, 921 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. W. Harding
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery (Neurosurgery)Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations