Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 347–358 | Cite as

Differential effects of bicuculline and muscimol microinjections into the vestibular nuclei on simian eye movements

  • A. Straube
  • R. Kurzan
  • U. Büttner
Article

Summary

1.) Eye movements were recorded in four Java monkeys (M. fascicularis) after unilateral microinjections (1 μl, concentration 1 μg/μl) of the GABA antagonist, bicuculline, and the GABA agonist, muscimol, into oculomotor related regions of the vestibular nuclei. Eye movements were investigated in the dark and light during spontaneous eye movements, vestibular stimulation (sinusoidal: 0.2 Hz, ±40 deg/s, and velocity trapezoid: 40 deg/s2 acceleration, 120 deg/s constant velocity), and visual-vestibular conflict stimulation. 2.) Bicuculline and muscimol injections consistently led to specific eye movement changes, which were maximal 5–10 min after bicuculline injection (muscimol 10–30 min), and lasted 90–120 min (muscimol 2–4 h). Control injections with NaCl (0.9%) into the responsive area and with bicuculline 2–3 mm more lateral showed no effect. 3.) Bicuculline induced a spontaneous nystagmus of 40.9 deg/s (average, range 10.5–93 deg/s), beating in 60% of the cases to the contralateral and in 40% to the ipsilateral side. The analysis of the slope of the slow phase gave no evidence for an additional gaze holding deficit. The VOR gain in the dark showed a slight decrease (pre: 0.96; post: 0.86) on average. The time constant of decay for slow phase nystagmus velocity after vestibular ramp stimulation was reduced, reflecting a ‘velocity storage’ deficit. After bicuculline injections nystagmus suppression in the light and during visual-vestibular conflict stimulation was generally well preserved. 4.) After muscimol injections horizontal gaze holding was severely affected. Each saccade was followed by an exponentially decreasing postsaccadic drift with a time constant as short as 250 ms (average 414 ms). The eyes always drifted towards a null-position, which generally did not coincide with the midposition of the eye. The null-position could move up to 35 deg to the contra-lateral or ipsilateral side. The highly distorted eye movements after muscimol injections prevented VOR-measurements based on eye velocity. Instead vestibular stimulation led to a shift of the null-position with an amplitude corresponding to a gain (eye position/stimulus position) of 0.17 (average) at 0.2 Hz (±40 deg/s). Vertical eye movements did not show a major gaze holding deficit. 5.) From the experiments it can be concluded that the inhibitory transmitter GABA plays an important role for eye movement generation within the vestibular nuclei. Bicuculline induces mainly a vestibular imbalance with little evidence for a neural integrator deficit. In contrast unilateral muscimol injections lead to a complete, reversible loss of function for the common horizontal neural integrator, which converts eye velocity into eye position signals. The accompanying shift of the null-position reflects an additional vestibular imbalance.

Key words

Eye movements Microinjections Vestibular nuclei Bicuculline Muscimol Alert monkey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander G (1912) Die Ohrenkrankheiten im Kindesalter. In: Pfaundler M, Schlossmann A (eds) Handbuch der Kinderheilkunde. tVogel, Leipzig, pp 84–96Google Scholar
  2. Blair SM, Gavin M (1981) Brainstem commissure and control of time constant of vestibular nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol 91: 1–8Google Scholar
  3. Boyle R, Büttner U, Markert G (1985) Vestibular nuclei activity and eye movements in the alert monkey during sinusoidal optokinetic simulation. Exp Brain Res 57: 362–369Google Scholar
  4. Büttner U, Waespe W (1981) Vestibular nerve activity in the alert monkey during vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus. Exp Brain Res 41: 310–315Google Scholar
  5. Cannon SC, Robinson DA (1985) An improved neural-network model for the neural integrator of the oculomotor system: more realistic neuron behavior. Biol Cybern 53: 93–108Google Scholar
  6. Cannon SC, Robinson DA (1987) Loss of the neural integrator of the oculomotor system from brain stem lesions in monkey. J Neurophysiol 57: 1383–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheron G, Gillis P, Godaux E (1986) Lesions in the cat prepositus complex: effects on the optokinetic system. J Physiol 372: 95–111Google Scholar
  8. Cheron G, Godaux E (1987) Disabling of the oculomotor neural integrator by kainic acid injections in the prepositus-vestibular complex of the cat. J Physiol 394: 267–290Google Scholar
  9. Chevalier G, Vacher S, Deniau JM, Desban M (1985) Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. I. The striato-nigral influence on tecto-spinal/tecto-diencephalic neurons. Brain Res 334: 215–226Google Scholar
  10. Cohen B, Matsuo V, Raphan T (1977) Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after-nystagmus. J Physiol 270: 321–344Google Scholar
  11. DeJong JMBV, Cohen B, Matsuo V, Uemura T (1980) Midsagittal pontomedullary brain stem section: effects on ocular adduction and nystagmus. Exp Neurol 68: 420–442Google Scholar
  12. Dixon WJ, Mood AM (1946) The statistical sign test. J Am Statist Assoc 41: 557–566Google Scholar
  13. Fetter M, Zee DS (1988) Recovery from unilateral labyrinthectomy in rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 59: 370–393Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs AF, Kimm J (1975) Unit activity in vestibular nucleus of the alert monkey during horizontal angular acceleration and eye movement. J Neurophysiol 38: 1140–1161Google Scholar
  15. Fukushima K (1987) The interstitial nucleus of Cajal and its role in the control of movements of head and eyes. Progr Neurobiol 29: 107–192Google Scholar
  16. Galiana HL (1986) A new approach to understanding adaptive visualvestibular interactions in the central nervous system. J Neurophysiol 55: 349–374Google Scholar
  17. Galiana HL, Outerbridge JS (1984) A bilateral model for central neural pathways in vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol 51: 210–241Google Scholar
  18. Gamlin PDR, Gnadt JW, Mays LE (1989) Lidocaine-induced unilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia: effects on convergence and conjugate eye movements. J Neurophysiol 62: 82–95Google Scholar
  19. Godaux E, Cheron G, Mettens P (1990) Ketamine induces failure of the oculomotor neural integrator in the cat. Neurosci Lett 116: 162–167Google Scholar
  20. Gonshor A, Malcolm R (1971) Effects of changes in illumination level on electro-oculography (EOG). Aerospace Med 42: 138–140Google Scholar
  21. Judge SJ, Richmond BJ, Chu FC (1980) Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision 20: 535–538Google Scholar
  22. King WM, Lisberger SG, Fuchs AF (1986) Oblique saccadic eye movements of primates. J Neurophysiol 56: 769–784Google Scholar
  23. Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Hanore T, Thyssen K (1979) GABA receptor agonists: design and structure activity studies. In: Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Scheel-Kruger J, Kofod H (eds) GABA-Neurotransmitters. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 201–216Google Scholar
  24. Lisberger SG (1988) The neural basis for learning of simple motor skills. Science 242: 728–735Google Scholar
  25. Markert G, Büttner U, Straube A, Boyle R (1988) Neuronal activity in the flocculus of the alert monkey during sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 70: 134–144Google Scholar
  26. Precht W (1983) Physiopathologische Grundlagen des vestibulären Nystagmus. Akt Neurol 10: 123–127Google Scholar
  27. Precht W, Schwindt PC, Baker R (1973) Removal of vestibular commissural inhibition by antagonists of GABA and glycine. Brain Res 62: 222–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson DA (1974) The effect of cerebellectomy on the cat's vestibuloocular integrator. Brain Res 71: 195–207Google Scholar
  29. Robinson DA (1981) Control of eye movements. In: Brooks VB (eds) Handbook of physiology Section 1. The nervous system, Vol II, Part 2. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, Maryland 1275–1320Google Scholar
  30. Robinson DA (1989) Integrating with neurons. Ann Rev Neurosci 12: 33–45Google Scholar
  31. Robinson DA, Zee DS, Hain TC, Holmes A, Rosenberg LF (1984)Alexander's law: its behavior and origin in the human vestibuloocular reflex. Ann Neurol 16: 714–722Google Scholar
  32. Sandkühler J, Maisch B and Zimmermann M (1987) The use of local anaesthetic microinjections to identify central pathways: a quantitative evaluation of the time course and extent of the neuronal block. Brain Res 68: 168–178Google Scholar
  33. Smart TG, Constanti A (1986) Studies on the mechanism of action of picrotoxin and other convulsants at the crustacean muscle GABA receptor. Proc R Soc Lond 227: 191–216Google Scholar
  34. Ten Bruggencate G, Engberg J (1971) Iontophoretic studies in Deiter's nucleus of the inhibitory actions of GABA and related amino acids and the interactions of strychnine and picrotoxin. Brain Res 25: 431–48Google Scholar
  35. Uemura T, Cohen B (1973) Effects of vestibular nuclei lesions on vestibulo-ocular reflexes and posture in monkeys. Acta Oto-Laryng (Stockh) [Suppl] 315: 1–71Google Scholar
  36. Waespe W, Henn V (1987) Gaze stabilization in the Primate. The interaction of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, optokinetic nystagmus, and smooth pursuit. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 106: 37–125Google Scholar
  37. Waespe W, Cohen B, Raphan Th (1985) Dynamic modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by the nodulus and uvula. Science 228: 199–202Google Scholar
  38. Zee DS, Yamazaki A, Butler PH, Gücer G (1981) Effects of ablation of flocculus and paraflocculus on eye movements in primates. J Neurophysiol 46: 878–899Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Straube
    • 1
  • R. Kurzan
    • 1
  • U. Büttner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyKlinikum Großhadern, Ludwig Maximilian UniversityMünchen 70Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations