Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 139–144 | Cite as

Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium

  • Y. Lajoie
  • N. Teasdale
  • C. Bard
  • M. Fleury
Article

Abstract

Upright standing and walking tasks require the integration of several sources of sensory information. In a normal and highly predictable environment, locomotor synergies involving several muscles may take place at lower spinal levels with neural circuitry tuned by local loops of assistance or self-organizing processes generated in coordinative networks. When ongoing regulation of gait is necessary (obstacles, changes in direction) supraspinal involvement is necessary to perform movements adapted to the environment. Using a classical information processing framework and a dual-task methodology, it is possible to evaluate the attentional demands for performing static and dynamic equilibrium tasks. The present experiment evaluates whether the attentional requirements for a control sitting condition and for standing and walking conditions vary with the intrinsic balance demands of the tasks. The results show that standing and walking conditions required more attention than sitting in a chair. The attentional cost for walking was also significantly greater than for standing. For the walking task, reaction times when subjects were in singlesupport phase (small base of support) were significantly longer than those in double-support phase, suggesting that the attentional demands increased with an increase in the balance requirements of the task. Balance control requires a continuous regulation and integration of sensory inputs; increasing balance demands loads the higher level cognitive system.

Key words

Posture Walking Attentional requirements Supraspinal control Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernethy B (1988) Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some applications and methodological constraints. J Hum Mov Stud 14:101–132Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong DM (1988) The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. J Physiol (Lond) 405:1–37Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong DM, Edgley DM (1984) Discharges of nucleus interpositus neurones during locomotion in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 351:411–432Google Scholar
  4. Bardy BG, Laurent M (1991) Visual cues and attention demands in locomotor positioning. Percep Mot Skills 72:915–926Google Scholar
  5. Cappozzo A, Figura F, Marchetti M (1976) The interplay of muscular and external forces in human ambulation. J Biomech 9:35–43Google Scholar
  6. Carter MC, Smith JL (1986) Simultaneous control of two rhythmical behaviours. II. Hindlimb walking with paw shake response in spinal cat. J Neurophysiol 56:184–195Google Scholar
  7. Cohen AH, Rossignol S, Grillner S (1988) Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietz V (1992) Neuronal control of stance and gait. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. Elsevier, New York, pp 483–499Google Scholar
  9. Drew T (1988) Motor cortical cell discharge during voluntary gait modification. Brain Res 457:181–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forssberg H (1979) Stumbling corrective reaction: a phase-dependent compensatory reaction during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 42:936–953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Geurts CH, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, Rijken AJ (1991) Dual-task assessment of reorganization of postural control in persons with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72:1059–1064Google Scholar
  12. Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Nienhuis B, Rijken AJ (1992) Postural reorganization following lower limb amputation. Scand J Rehab Med 24:83–90Google Scholar
  13. Girouard Y (1980) L'attention et l'acquisition de l'habileté motrice. In: Nadeau CH, Halliwell WR, Newell KM, Roberts GC (eds) Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 535–552Google Scholar
  14. Grillner S (1975) Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol Rev 55:247–304Google Scholar
  15. Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods and fish. In: Brooks V (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1, The nervous system, vol 2. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1179–1236Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  17. Kelso JAS, Schöner G (1988) Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Hum Mov Sci 7:27–46Google Scholar
  18. Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA (1985) Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:617–622Google Scholar
  19. Massion J (1984) Postural changes accompanying voluntary movements: normal and pathological aspects. Hum Neurobiol 2:261–267Google Scholar
  20. McMahon TA (1984) Mechanics of locomotion. Int J Robotics Res 3:4–28Google Scholar
  21. Mochon S, McMahon TA (1980) Ballistic walking. J Biomech 13:49–57Google Scholar
  22. Paillard J (1985) Les niveaux sensorimoteur et cognitif du contrôle de l'action. In: Laurent M, Therme P (eds) Recherches en activité, physique et sportive 1. Publication du Centre de Recherche de l'U.E.R.E.P.S., Marseille, pp 147–163Google Scholar
  23. Paillard J (1988) Posture and locomotion: old problems and new concepts. In: Amblard B, Berthoz A, Clarac F (eds) Posture and gait: development, adaptation and modulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, pp 5–12Google Scholar
  24. Parasuraman R (1981) Sustained attention: a multifactorial approach. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 493–511Google Scholar
  25. Patla AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, Neufeld J (1991) Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:603–634Google Scholar
  26. Pearson K (1976) The control of walking. Sci Am 235:72–86Google Scholar
  27. Posner MI, Keele SW (1969) Attention demands of movements. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Congress of Applied Psychology. Swets and Zeitlinger, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13:25–42Google Scholar
  29. Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L (1990) Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. Exp Brain Res 82:97–106Google Scholar
  30. Rossignol S, Drew T (1985) Interactions of segmental and suprasegmental inputs with the spinal pattern generator of locomotion. In: Barnes WJ, Gladden MH (eds) Feedback and motor control in invertebrates and vertebrates. Croom Helm, London, pp 355–377Google Scholar
  31. Rossignol S, Lund JP, Drew T (1988) The role of sensory inputs in regulating patterns of rhythmical movements in higher vertebrates. In: Cohen A, Rossignol S, Grillner S (eds) Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates. Wiley, New York, pp 201–283Google Scholar
  32. Sajiki N, Isagoda A, Moriai N, Nakamura R (1989) Reaction time during walking. Percept Mot Skills 62:259–262Google Scholar
  33. Schöner G (1990) A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement. Biol Cybern 63:257–270Google Scholar
  34. Shimba T (1984) An estimation of the center of gravity from force platform data. J Biomech 17:53–60Google Scholar
  35. Sperry RL (1988) Psychology's mentalist paradigm and the religionscience tension. Am Psychol 43:607–613Google Scholar
  36. Stelmach GE, Worringham CJ (1985) Sensorimotor deficits related to postural stability: implications for falling in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1:679–694Google Scholar
  37. Stelmach GE, Populin L, Müller R (1990) Postural muscle onset ans voluntary movement in the elderly. Neurosci Lett 117:188–193Google Scholar
  38. Teasdale N, Bard C, Dadouchi F, Fleury M, LaRue J, Stelmach GE (1992) Posture and elderly persons: evidence for deficits in the central integrative mechanisms. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior II. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 917–931Google Scholar
  39. Teasdale N, Bard C, Larue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19:1–13Google Scholar
  40. Turvey MT, Kugler PN (1984) An ecological approach to perception and action. In: Whiting HTA (ed) Human motor action:Bernstein reassessed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 373–412Google Scholar
  41. Warren WH, Young DS, Lee DN (1986) Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. J Exp Psychol 12:259–266Google Scholar
  42. Winter DA (1991) The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological, 2nd edn University of Waterloo, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  43. Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS (1990) Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 16:31–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Lajoie
    • 1
  • N. Teasdale
    • 1
  • C. Bard
    • 1
  • M. Fleury
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Performance Motrice Humaine, Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations