Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 314–322 | Cite as

The control and coordination of one-handed catching: the effect of temporal constraints

  • M. Laurent
  • G. Montagne
  • G. J. P. Savelsbergh
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to identify the control mechanisms involved in a goal-directed task by manipulating the temporal constraints. Subjects were required to catch, with one hand, table tennis balls projected by a ball-projection machine under five temporal conditions (ball speed ranged from 5.7 to 9 m/s, giving rise to flight times of 550-350 ms). By means of three-dimensional kinematics analysis the following results were obtained, which are some spatio-temporal adaptations of the catching movement to the increase of temporal constraints: (1) a decrease in movement time, (2) an increase in the straightness of the trajectory of the wrist, and (3) a shift backwards of the place of ball-hand contact while (4) the grasping time was kept constant. Moreover, as a result of increasing temporal constraints, the acceleration phase of the transportation component was kept constant while the deceleration phase was progressively decreased and nearly suppressed. Further, an increased correlation of the initial direction of the transportation component with the initial direction of the ball path was found. These findings show some spatio-temporal adaptations of the catching movement when the time available is manipulated. They also support the contention of a shift in the control mechanisms involved in one-handed catching facing different temporal constraints.

Key words

One-handed catching Temporal constraints Motor control Kinematics Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson GJK, Sully DJ, Sully HG (1974) An operational analysis of a one handed catching task using high speed photography. J Mot Behav 6:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annett J, Golby CW, Kay H (1958) The measurement of elements in an assembly task — the information output of the human motor system. Q J Exp Psychol 10:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beggs WDA, Howarth CI (1972) The movement of the hand towards a target Q J Exp Psychol 24:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bootsma RJ, Van Wieringen PCW (1990) Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bootsma RJ, Houbiers MHJ, Whiting HTA, Van Wieringen PCW (1991) Acquiring an attacking forehand drive: the effects of static and dynamic environmental conditions. Res Q Exerc Sport 62:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bootsma RJ, Peper CE (1992) Predictive visual information sources for the regulation of action with special emphasis on catching and hitting. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 285–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carnahan H, Goodale MA, Marteniuk RG (1993) Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback. Hum Mov Sci 12:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrigno G, Pedotti A (1985) ELITE: a digital dedicated hardware system for movement analysis via real time TV signal processing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:46:62Google Scholar
  9. Fetters L, Todd J (1987) Quantitative assessment of infant reaching. J Mot Behav 19:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischman MG, Schneider T (1985) Skill level, vision, and proprioception in simple one-hand catching. J Mot Behav 18:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gahery Y (1987) Associated movements, postural adjustments and synergie: some comments about the history and significance of three motor concepts. Arch Ital Biol 125:365–380Google Scholar
  12. Gibson JJ (1979) An ecological approach to visual perception. Hougton-Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofsten C von (1979) Development of visually directed reaching: the approach phase. J Hum Mov Stud 5:160–178Google Scholar
  14. Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–168Google Scholar
  15. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. McKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Dugas C, Liske D, Eickmeier B (1987) Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitt's task: implication for control. Q J Exp Psychol 39:629–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marteniuk RG, McKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, McKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montagne G, Laurent M (1994) The effect of environmental changes on one-handed ball-catching. J Mot Behav (In Press)Google Scholar
  21. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosengren KS, Pick HL, Von Hofsten C (1988) Role of vision in ball-catching. J Mot Behav 20:150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA (1988) The effect of skill level, external frame of reference and environmental changes on onehanded catching. Ergonomics 31:1655–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA, Bootsma RJ (1991) ‘Grasping’ TAU. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA, Burden AM, Bartlett RM (1992) The role of predictive visual temporal information in the coordination of muscle activity in catching. Exp Brain Res 89:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Savelsbergh GJP, Whiting HTA, Pijpers JR, Van Santvoord AAM (1993) The visual guidance of catching. Exp Brain Res 93:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32:1513–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smyth MM, Marriott AM (1982) Vision and proprioception in simple catching. J Mot Behav 14:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallace SA, Weeks DL (1988) Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. J Mot Behav 20:81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whiting HTA, Gill EB, Stephenson JM (1970) Critical time intervals for taking in flight information in a ball-catching task. Ergonomics 13:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whiting HTA, Savelsbergh GJP, Faber CM (1988) Catch questions and incomplete answers. In: Colley AM, Beech JR (eds), Cognition and action in skilled behaviour. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wood GA (1982) Data smoothing and differentiation procedures in biomechanics. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 10:308–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Laurent
    • 2
  • G. Montagne
    • 2
  • G. J. P. Savelsbergh
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Human Movement SciencesFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of Aix-MarseilleMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations