Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 591–599 | Cite as

Influence of local sensory afference in the calibration of human balance responses

  • R. P. Di Fabio
  • M. B. Badke
  • A. McEvoy
  • A. Breunig
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

Peripheral sensory modulation of balance behavior may require a “calibrated” mechanism which would maintain upright standing by a feedback control of torque at the ankle joint. The calibration of human balance was studied using a systematic presentation of perturbation excursions and velocities in normal freely standing subjects. All perturbations (posterior movements of a force platform) induced a forward body sway and were presented by first increasing and then decreasing the magnitude of perturbation. In preselected conditions the stability of the ankle and hence the accuracy of surface orientation inputs was altered using a foam base placed under the subjects feet. Each subject pressed a hand held response key at the moment a postural disturbance was detected. The automatic neuromuscular response (ANR) was recorded from the gastrocnemius muscles bilaterally and the perturbation detection time (DT) was obtained from the onset of thenar muscle discharge. The major findings in this study were: (1) Conscious DT changed as a function of step variations in perturbation excursion and was disassociated from the ANR latency. The ANR latency remained essentially constant in all conditions and did not have any influence on the kinematics of body sway. (2) Normalized peak body sway decreased during unstable ankle conditions and the reduction of body sway could be attributed to an increase in the gain of the ANR across a 200 ms integration period. The ANR 200 ms amplitude also showed higher correlations with perturbation magnitude during unstable (versus stable) ankle conditions. (3) The 200 ms gastrocnemius amplitude was modulated by excursion and velocity of platform displacement but the amplitude integrated over 100 ms was dependent on only the velocity of perturbation. Our results indicate that balance is controlled by a centrally initiated postural response but regulated in amplitude by local sensory information. These results establish that the gain of the ANR is functional, peripherally driven, and occurs subconsciously to alter the kinematics of body sway.

Key words

Balance Sensory afference Reaction time EMG Human 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnet M (1983) Anticipatory changes of long-latency stretch responses during preparation for directional hand movements. Brain Res 280: 51–62Google Scholar
  3. Boylls CC, Greene PH (1984) Bernstein's significance today. In: Whiting HTA (ed) Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed. North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  4. Brocke JK, Boyce DE, Mcllroy WE, Robinson T, Wagar D (1986) Transfer of variability from electromyogram to propulsive force in human locomotion. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 26: 239–400Google Scholar
  5. Chan CWY, Melville Jones G, Catchlove RF (1979) The ‘late’ electromyographic response to limb displacement in man. II. Sensory origin. Electro Enceph Clin Neurophysiol 46: 182–188Google Scholar
  6. Chan CWY, Kearney RE (1982) Is the functional stretch response servo controlled or preprogrammed? Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 53: 310–324Google Scholar
  7. Cole KJ, Gracco VL, Abbs JH (1984) Autogenic and nonautogenicsensbrimotor action in the control of multiarticulate hand movements. Exp Brain Res 56: 582–585Google Scholar
  8. Crago PE, Houk JC, Hasan Z (1976) Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39: 925–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Desmedt JE, Godaux E (1978) Ballistic skilled movements: Load compensation and patterning of motor commands. In: JE Desmedt (ed) Prog in Clin Neurophysiol, Vol 4. Cerebral motor control in man: long loop reflexes. Karger, Basel, pp 21–55Google Scholar
  10. Diener HC, Bootz F, Dichgans J, Bruzek W (1983) Variability of postural ‘reflexes’ in humans. Exp Brain Res 52: 423–428Google Scholar
  11. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Guschlbauer B, Mau H (1984a) The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia. Brain Res 296: 103–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bootz F, Bacher M (1984b) Early stabilization of human posture after a sudden disturbance: influence of rate and amplitude of displacement. Exp Brain Res 56: 126–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener HC, Horak FB, Nashner LM (1988) Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 59: 1888–1905Google Scholar
  14. Dietz V, Horstmann G, Berger W (1988) Involvement of different receptors in the regulation of human posture. Neurosci Lett 94: 82–87Google Scholar
  15. Di Fabio RP, Badke MB, Duncan PW (1986) Adapting human postural reflexes following localized cerebrobascular lesion: analysis of bilateral long latency responses. Brain Res 363: 257–264Google Scholar
  16. Di Fabio RP (1987) Lower extremity antagonist muscle response following standing perturbation in subjects with cerebrovascular disease. Brain Res 406: 43–51Google Scholar
  17. Di Fabio RP, Badke MB (1989) Reliability of postural response as a function of muscular synergisms: effect of supraspinal lesions. Hum Mov Sci 8: 447–464Google Scholar
  18. Evarts EV, Tanji J (1974) Gating of motor cortex reflexes by prior instruction. Brain Res 71: 479–494Google Scholar
  19. Evarts EV, and Granit R (1976) Relations of reflexes and intended movements. Progr Brain Res 44: 1–14Google Scholar
  20. Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1979) Responses to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex. J Neurophysiol 42: 91–106Google Scholar
  21. Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1980) Response to sudden torques about ankle in man. II. Postmyotatic reactions. J Neurophysiol 43: 86–101Google Scholar
  22. Hammond PH (1956) The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuromuscular response. J Physiol (Lond) 122: 17–18Google Scholar
  23. Hebb D (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55: 1369–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Houk JC (1978) Participation of reflex mechanisms and reactiontime processes in the compensatory adjustments to mechanical disturbances. In: Desmedt JK (ed) Progress in clinical neurophysiology. Cerebral motor control in man: long loop mechanisms. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  26. Iles JF (1977) Responses of human pretibial muscles to sudden stretch and nerve stimulation. Exp Brain Res 30: 451–470Google Scholar
  27. Karst GM, Hasan Z (1987) Antagonist muscle activity during human forearm movements under varying kinematic and loading conditions. Exp Brain Res 67: 391–401Google Scholar
  28. Katz R, Rondot P (1978) Muscle reaction to passive shortening in normal man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 45: 90–99Google Scholar
  29. Kearney RE, Hunter IW (1985) Should dynamic and passive properties be considered in analyses of human postural control? Behav Brain Sci 8: 158–159Google Scholar
  30. Keshner EA, Woollacott MH, Debu B (1988) Neck, trunk and limb muscle responses during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res 71: 455–466Google Scholar
  31. Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF: Responses of mono- and bi-articular muscles to load perturbations of the human arm. Exp Brain Res 65: 135–144, 1986Google Scholar
  32. Lee RG, Tatton WG (1982) Long latency reflexes to imposed displacements of the human wrist: dependence on duration of movement. Exp Brain Res 45: 207–216Google Scholar
  33. Loo CRC, McCloskey DI (1985) Effects of prior instruction and anaesthesia on long latency responses to stretch in the long flexor of the human thumb. J Physiol Lond 365: 285–296Google Scholar
  34. Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1981) Human postural responses. Brain 104: 513–534Google Scholar
  35. Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26: 59–72Google Scholar
  36. Nashner LM (1977) Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Exp Brain Res 30: 13–24Google Scholar
  37. Nashner LM, Cordo PJ (1981) Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles. Exp Brain Res 43: 395–405Google Scholar
  38. Winter DA, Yack HJ (1987) EMG profiles during normal human walking stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 67: 402–411Google Scholar
  39. Woollacott MH, Von Hosten C, Rosblad B (1988) Relation between muscle response onset and body segmental movements during postural perturbations in humans. Exp Brain Res 72: 593–604Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. Di Fabio
    • 1
  • M. B. Badke
    • 1
  • A. McEvoy
    • 1
  • A. Breunig
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin, Center for Health SciencesMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations