Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 562–576 | Cite as

Modulatory influences of a moving visual noise background on bar-evoked responses of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex

  • J. M. Crook
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

The modulatory influence of a synchronously moving visual noise background on responsiveness to an optimally-oriented moving bar stimulus was investigated in visual cortical area 18 of the lightly-anaesthetized cat. The bar and noise background were swept along the axis orthogonal to bar orientation, with the same phase, velocity and amplitude of motion. Cells which were insensitive to motion of visual noise per se or weakly responsive to individual ‘grains’ in the noise sample showed suppression of bar-evoked responses by simultaneous motion of the noise background. Percent suppression declined with increase in bar length, over a range which could exceed the maximum estimate of receptive field length. The decline in percent suppression was non-linear, becoming progressively flatter in slope as bar length was increased until an asymptotic value was reached; observations on end-stopped cells and on end-free cells with restricted length summation verified that percent suppression was related specifically to the length of the comparison bar and not to the strength of response it evoked. Percent suppression and the extent over which it declined with increase in bar length were comparable for preferred and opposite directions of bar motion even in cells with radically different length-response functions in the two directions, including end-stopped cells with direction-selective end-zones. In contrast to end-inhibition, which was maximal at or near the preferred velocity for a bar of optimal length, percent suppression by motion of the noise background was essentially velocity-invariant; in velocity tuned and velocity high-pass cells, background motion reduced the slope(s) of the velocity-response function, implying that the suppressive action of moving noise backgrounds is divisive rather than subtractive. It is argued that the suppression derives predominantly from an axo-somatic noise-sensitive inhibitory input from superficial- and deep-layer, large basket cells in orientation ‘columns’ at some distance from those of their target cells.

Key words

Cat area 18 Visual noise Foreground/background interactions Velocity sensitivity Divisive vs. subtractive inhibition 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed B, Hammond P (1983) Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to motion of visual texture. Exp Brain Res 53: 444–450Google Scholar
  2. Bishop PO, Kato H, Orban GA (1980) Direction-selective cells in complex family in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 43: 1266–1283Google Scholar
  3. Blomfield S (1974) Arithmetical operations performed by nerve cells. Brain Res 69: 115–124Google Scholar
  4. Boyapati J, Henry GH (1987) The duplex character of the corticofugal pathway from the striate cortex to the lateral geniculate complex of the cat. Vision Res 27: 723–726Google Scholar
  5. Bullier J, Kennedy H, Salinger W (1984) Branching and laminar origin of projections between visual cortical areas in the cat. J Comp Neurol 228: 329–341Google Scholar
  6. Creutzfeldt OD, Ito M (1968) Functional synaptic organization of primary visual cortex neurones in the cat. Exp Brain Res 6: 324–352Google Scholar
  7. Crook JM (1987) A neurophysiological investigation of the feline extrastriate visual cortex (area 18) using oriented and textured stimuli: a comparison with area 17. PhD thesis. University of Keele, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Crook JM (1990) Directional tuning of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex for visual noise, bar and spot stimuli: a comparison with area 17. Exp Brain Res 80: 545–561Google Scholar
  9. Dean AF, Hess RF, Tolhurst DJ (1980) Divisive inhibition involved in direction selectivity. J Physiol 308: 84–85PGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinse HRO, von Seelen W (1981) On the function of cell systems in area 18, Part II. Biol Cybern 41: 59–69Google Scholar
  11. Dreher B, Cottee LJ (1975) Visual receptive-field properties of cells in area 18 of cat's cerebral cortex before and after acute lesions in area 17. J Neurophysiol 38: 735–750Google Scholar
  12. Dubin MW, Cleland BG (1977) Organization of visual inputs to interneurons of lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 40: 410–427Google Scholar
  13. Ferster D, Lindström S (1983) An intracellular analysis of geniculocortical connectivity in area 17 of the cat. J Physiol 342: 181–215Google Scholar
  14. Fischer B, Krüger J (1974) The shift-effect in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Exp Brain Res 21: 225–227Google Scholar
  15. Freund TF, Martin KAC, Whitteridge D (1985) Innervation of cat visual areas 17 and 18 by physiologically identified X- and Y-type thalamic afferents. I. Arborization patterns and quantitative distribution of postsynaptic elements. J Comp Neurol 242: 263–274Google Scholar
  16. Frömel G (1980a) Extraction of objects from structured backgrounds in the cat superior colliculus, Part I. Biol Cybern 38: 63–73Google Scholar
  17. Frömel G (1980b) Extraction of objects from structured backgrounds in the cat superior colliculus, Part II. Biol Cybern 38: 75–83Google Scholar
  18. Gabbott PLA, Martin KAC, Whitteridge D (1987) Connections between pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of cat visual cortex (area 17). J Comp Neurol 259: 364–381Google Scholar
  19. Garey LJ, Powell TPS (1971) An experimental study of the termination of the lateral geniculo-cortical pathway in the cat and monkey. Proc R Soc Lond B179: 41–63Google Scholar
  20. Gilbert CD, Wiesel TN (1979) Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterised neurones in the cat visual cortex. Nature 280: 120–125Google Scholar
  21. Gulyás B, Orban GA, Duysens J, Maes H (1987) The suppressive influence of moving textured backgrounds on responses of cat striate neurons to moving bars. J Neurophysiol 57: 1767–1791Google Scholar
  22. Hammond P (1978) Directional tuning of complex cells in area 17 of the feline visual cortex. J Physiol 285: 479–491Google Scholar
  23. Hammond P (1981) Non-stationarity of ocular dominance in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 42: 189–195Google Scholar
  24. Hammond P, Ahmed B, Smith AT (1986) Relative motion sensitivity in cat striate cortex as a function of stimulus direction. Brain Res 386: 93–104Google Scholar
  25. Hammond P, MacKay DM (1981) Modulatory influences of moving textured backgrounds on responsiveness of simple cells in feline striate cortex. J Physiol 319: 431–442Google Scholar
  26. Hammond P, Shorrocks IME (1987) Stimulus-dependent characteristics of complex cells in cat striate cortex. J Physiol 382: 174PGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammond P, Smith AT (1983) Directional tuning interactions between moving oriented and textured stimuli in complex cells of feline striate cortex. J Physiol 342: 35–49Google Scholar
  28. Hammond P, Smith AT (1984) Sensitivity of complex cells in cat striate cortex to relative motion. Brain Res 301: 287–298Google Scholar
  29. Harvey AR (1980) A physiological analysis of subcortical and commissural projections of areas 17 and 18 of the cat. J Physiol 302: 507–534Google Scholar
  30. Henry GH, Goodwin AW, Bishop PO (1978) Spatial summation of responses in receptive fields of single cells in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 32: 245–266Google Scholar
  31. Hoffmann K-P, Morrone CM, Reuter JH (1980) A comparison of the responses of single cells in the LGN and visual cortex to bar and noise stimuli in the cat. Vision Res 20: 771–777Google Scholar
  32. Hoffmann K-P, von Seelen W (1978) Analysis of neuronal networks in the visual system of the cat using statistical signals: simple and complex cells, Part II. Biol Cybern 31: 175–185Google Scholar
  33. Hornung JP, Garey LJ (1981) The thalamic projection to cat visual cortex: ultrastructure of neurons identified by Golgi impregnation or retrograde horseradish peroxidase transport. Neuroscience 6: 1053–1068Google Scholar
  34. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1965) Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol 28: 229–289Google Scholar
  35. Kisvárday ZF, Martin KAC, Freund TF, Magloczky Z, Whitteridge D, Somogyi P (1986) Synaptic targets of HRP-filled layer III pyramidal cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 64: 541–552Google Scholar
  36. Kisvárday ZF, Martin KAC, Friedlander MJ, Somogyi P (1987) Evidence for interlaminar inhibitory circuits in the striate cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 260: 1–19Google Scholar
  37. Kisvárday ZF, Martin KAC, Whitteridge D, Somogyi P (1985) Synaptic connections of intracellularly filled clutch cells: a type of small basket cell in the visual cortex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 241: 111–137Google Scholar
  38. LeVay S (1988) Patchy intrinsic projections in visual cortex, area 18, of the cat: morphological and immunocytochemical evidence for an excitatory function. J Comp Neurol 269: 265–274Google Scholar
  39. LeVay S, Gilbert CD (1976) Laminar patterns of geniculocortical projection in the cat. Brain Res 113: 1–19Google Scholar
  40. Martin KAC, Somogyi P, Whitteridge D (1983) Physiological and morphological properties of identified basket cells in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 50: 193–200Google Scholar
  41. Mason R (1976) Responses of cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate complex of the cat to textured visual stimuli. Exp Brain Res 25: 323–326Google Scholar
  42. Mason R (1981) Differential responsiveness of cells in the visual zones of the cat's LP-pulvinar complex to visual stimuli. Exp Brain Res 43: 25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Matsubara J, Nance DM, Cynader MS (1987) Laminar distribution of GABA-immunoreactive neurons and processes in area 18 of the cat. Brain Res Bull 18: 121–126Google Scholar
  44. Morrone MC, Burr DC, Maffei L (1982) Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence. Proc R Soc Lond B216: 335–354Google Scholar
  45. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978) Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 283: 101–120Google Scholar
  46. Orban GA (1984) Neuronal operations in the visual cortex: studies of brain function, Vol 11. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  47. Orban GA, Gulyás B, Vogels R (1987) Influence of a moving textured background on direction selectivity of cat striate neurons. J Neurophysiol 57: 1792–1812Google Scholar
  48. Orban GA, Kato H, Bishop PO (1979a) End-zone region in receptive fields of hypercomplex and other striate neurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol 42: 818–832Google Scholar
  49. Orban GA, Kato H, Bishop PO (1979b) Dimensions and properties of end-zone inhibitory areas in receptive fields of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 42: 833–849Google Scholar
  50. Orban GA, Kennedy H, Maes H (1981) Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 45: 1043–1058Google Scholar
  51. Riva Sanseverino E, Galletti C, Maioli MG, Squatrito S (1979) Single unit responses to visual stimuli in cat cortical areas 17 and 18. III. Responses to moving stimuli of variable velocity. Arch Ital Biol 117: 248–267Google Scholar
  52. Rose D (1977) On the arithmetic operation performed by inhibitory synapses onto the neuronal soma. Exp Brain Res 28: 221–223Google Scholar
  53. Sherk H (1978) Area 18 cell responses in cat during reversible inactivation of area 17. J Neurophysiol 41: 204–215Google Scholar
  54. Sillito AM (1977) The spatial extent of excitatory and inhibitory zones in the receptive field of superficial layer hypercomplex cells. J Physiol 273: 791–803Google Scholar
  55. Somogyi P, Kisvárday ZF, Martin KAC, Whitteridge D (1983) Synaptic connections of morphologically identified and physiologically characterized large basket cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Neuroscience 10: 261–294Google Scholar
  56. Symonds LL, Rosenquist AC (1984) Corticocortical connections among visual areas in the cat. J Comp Neurol 229: 1–38Google Scholar
  57. Toyama K, Matsunami K, Ohno T, Tokashiki S (1974) An intracellular study of neuronal organization in the visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 21: 45–66Google Scholar
  58. von Grünau M, Frost BJ (1983) Double-opponent-process mechanism underlying RF-structure of directionally specific cells of cat lateral suprasylvian visual area. Exp Brain Res 49: 84–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Crook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication and NeuroscienceUniversity of KeeleKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations