Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 84, Issue 7–8, pp 803–811 | Cite as

Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species

  • Johan W. van Ooijen
Article

Summary

The development of linkage maps with large numbers of molecular markers has stimulated the search for methods to map genes involved in quantitative traits (QTLs). A promising method, proposed by Lander and Botstein (1989), employs pairs of neighbouring markers to obtain maximum linkage information about the presence of a QTL within the enclosed chromosomal segment. In this paper the accuracy of this method was investigated by computer simulation. The results show that there is a reasonable probability of detecting QTLs that explain at least 5% of the total variance. For this purpose a minimum population of 200 backcross or F2 individuals is necessary. Both the number of individuals and the relative size of the genotypic effect of the QTL are important factors determining the mapping precision. On the average, a QTL with 5% or 10% explained variance is mapped on an interval of 40 or 20 centiMorgans, respectively. Of course, QTLs with a larger genotypic effect will be located more precisely. It must be noted, however, that the interval length is rather variable.

Key words

Mapping Molecular markers Quantitative trait loci 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Statist Soc Ser B 39:1–38Google Scholar
  2. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Helentjaris T (1987) A genetic map for maize based on RFLPs. Trends Genet 3:217–221Google Scholar
  4. Jansen J (1991) Fitting regression models to ordinal data. Biom J 33:807–815Google Scholar
  5. Jensen J (1989) Estimation of recombination parameters between a quantitative trait locus (QTL) and two marker gene loci. Theor Appl Genet 78:613–618Google Scholar
  6. Keim P, Diers BW, Olson TC, Shoemaker RC (1990) RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 126:735–742Google Scholar
  7. Knapp SJ, Bridges WC, Birkes D (1990) Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular marker linkage maps. Theor Appl Genet 79:583–592Google Scholar
  8. Lander ES, Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo ZW, Kearsey MJ (1989) Maximum likelihood estimation of linkage between a marker gene and a quantitative trait locus. Heredity 63:401–408Google Scholar
  10. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE (1988) Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. O'Brien SJ (ed) (1990) Genetic maps, 5th edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ooijen JW van (1989) The predictive value of estimates of quantitative genetic parameters in breeding of autogamous crops. PhD-thesis, Agricultural University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  13. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335:721–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Paterson AH, DeVerna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley SD (1990) Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124:735–742Google Scholar
  15. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD (1991) Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181–197Google Scholar
  16. Sax K (1923) The association of size differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8:552–560Google Scholar
  17. Thoday JM (1961) Location of polygenes. Nature 191:368–370Google Scholar
  18. Titteringon DM, Smith AFM, Makov UE (1985) Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Weller JI (1986) Maximum likelihood techniques for the mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci with the aid of genetic markers. Biometrics 42:627–640Google Scholar
  20. Welsh J, McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213–7218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1988) Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast-evolving, low copy-number sequences. Mol Gen Genet 213:254–2617Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan W. van Ooijen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsAgricultural UniversityHA WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations