Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 562–580 | Cite as

Cognitive spatial-motor processes

7. The making of movements at an angle from a stimulus direction: studies of motor cortical activity at the single cell and population levels
  • J. T. Lurito
  • T. Georgakopoulos
  • A. P. Georgopoulos
Article

Summary

Two rhesus monkeys were trained to move a handle on a two-dimensional (2-D) working surface either towards a visual stimulus (“direct” task) or in a direction orthogonal and counterclockwise (CCW) from the stimulus (“transformation” task), depending on whether the stimulus appeared dim or bright, respectively. Thus the direction of the stimulus (S, in polar coordinates) and the direction of the movement (M) were the same in the direct task but differed in the transformation task, such that M = S + 90°CCW. The task (i.e. brightness) condition (k = 2, i.e. direct or transformation) and the direction of the stimulus (m = 8, i.e. 8 equally spaced directions on a circle) resulted in 16 combinations (k × m = 16 “classes”) that were varied from trial to trial in a randomized block design. In 8 of these combinations the direction of the stimulus was the same for both tasks, whereas the direction of the movement was the same in the remaining 8 cases.

The electrical signs of cell activity (N = 394 cells) in the arm area of the motor cortex (contralateral to the performing arm) were recorded extracellularly. The neural activity was analyzed at the single cell and neuronal population levels, and a modeling of the time course of single activity during the transformation task was carried out. We found the following, (a) Individual cells were active in both tasks; no cells were found that were active exclusively in only one of the two tasks. The patterns of single cell activity in the transformation task frequently differed from those observed in the direct task when the stimulus or the movement were the same. More specifically, cells could not be consistently classified as “movement”-or “stimulus”-related for frequently the activity of a particular cell would seem “movement-related” for a particular stimulus-movement combination, “stimulus-related” for another combination, or unrelated to either movement or stimulus for still another combination. Thus no real insight could be gained from such an analysis of single cell activity. (e) In a different analysis, we explored the idea that a changing directional signal could be detected in the time course of single cell activity during the reaction time. For that purpose we modeled the time course of single activity observed in the transformation task as a linear, weighted combination of influences from the direct task, taking the time patterns of cell activity during the stimulus, intermediate and movement directions in the direct task as estimates of the postulated directional influences. The results were inconclusive, in the sense that the best weighting scheme led to more than 46 % error in prediction in more than 50 % of the comparisons. Moreover, various combinations gave closely similar predictions. (c) An analysis of the activity of the neuronal population using the time evolution of the neuronal population vector (Georgopoulos et al. 1984) revealed an orderly rotation of the neuronal population vector from the direction of the stimulus towards the direction of the movement through the 90°CCW angle. (d) The hypothesis was tested that this apparent rotation of the population vector could be the result of activation of two subsets of cells, one with preferred directions at or near the stimulus direction, and the other with preferred directions at or near the movement directions: if cells of the former type were recruited at the beginning of the reaction time, followed by those of the second type, then the vector sum of the two could provide the rotating population vector. However, such a preferential activation of “stimulus-direction” centered and “movement-direction” centered cells was not observed. (e) On the other hand, a true rotation of the population vector could be reflected in the engagement of cells with intermediate preferred directions during the middle of the reaction time. Indeed, such a transient increase in the recruitment of cells with intermediate (i.e. between the stimulus and movement) preferred directions during the middle of the reaction time was observed. This supports the idea of a true rotation of the population signal.

Key words

Motor cortex Cognitive function Arm movement Movement direction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD (1990a) Preparation for movement: neural representation of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 64: 133–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander GE, Crutcher MD (1990b) Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 64: 164–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JR (1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychol Rev 85: 249–276Google Scholar
  4. Caminiti R, Johnson PB, Urbano A (1990) Making arm movements within different parts of space: Dynamic aspects in the primate motor cortex. J Neurosci 10: 2039–2058Google Scholar
  5. Caminiti R, Johnson PB, Galli C, Ferraina S, Burnod Y, Urbano A (1991) Making arm movements within different parts of space: the premotor and motor cortical representation of a coordibnate system for reaching at visual targets. J Neurosci (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Evarts EV (1981) Role of the motor cortex in voluntary movements in primates. In: Handbook of physiology. The nervous system II. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 1083–1120Google Scholar
  7. Favilla M, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1990) Discrete and continuous processes in the programming of extent and direction in multijoint arm movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 16: 1089Google Scholar
  8. Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VI. Independent specification of response amplitude and direction. Exp Brain Res 75: 280–294Google Scholar
  9. Fetz EE, Cheney PD (1980) Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. J Neurophysiol 44: 751–772Google Scholar
  10. Fitts PM, Seeger CM (1953) S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J Exp Psychol 46: 199–210Google Scholar
  11. Fortier PA, Kalaska JF, Smith AM (1989) Cerebellar neuronal activity related to whole-arm reaching movements in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 62: 198–211Google Scholar
  12. Freyd JJ (1987) Dynamic mental representations. Psychol Rev 94: 427–438Google Scholar
  13. Georgopoulos AP (1991) Higher order motor control. Ann Rev Neurosci 14: 361–377Google Scholar
  14. Georgopoulos AP, Caminiti R, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1983) Spatial coding of movement: A hypothesis concerning the coding of movement direction by motor cortical populations. Exp Brain Res Suppl 7: 327–336Google Scholar
  15. Georgopoulos AP, Crutcher MD, Schwartz AB (1989a) Cognitive spatial motor processes. 3. Motor cortical prediction of movement direction during an instructed delay period. Exp Brain Res 75: 183–194Google Scholar
  16. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF Caminiti R, Massey JT (1982) On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J Neurosci 2: 1527–1537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Crutcher MD, Caminiti R, Massey JT (1984) The representation of movement direction in the motor cortex: single cell and population studies. In: Edelman GM, Cowan WM, Gall WE (eds) Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. Wiley, New York, pp 501–524Google Scholar
  18. Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46: 725–743Google Scholar
  19. Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE, Schwartz AB (1988) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. 2. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population. J Neurosci 8: 2928–2937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Georgopoulos AP, Lurito JT, Petrides M, Schwartz AB, Massey JT (1989b) Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science 243: 234–236Google Scholar
  21. Georgopoulos AP, Massey JT (1987) Cognitive spatial-motor processes. 1. The making of movements at various angles from a stimulus direction. Exp Brain Res 65: 361–370Google Scholar
  22. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE (1986) Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233: 1416–1419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hocherman S, Wise SP (1991) Effects of hand movement path on motor cortical activity in awake, behaving rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 83: 285–302Google Scholar
  24. Jackson JH (1889) On the comparative study of diseases of the nervous system. Brit Med J ii: 355–362Google Scholar
  25. Kalaska JF (1988) The representation of arm movements in postcentral and parietal cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66: 455–463Google Scholar
  26. Kalaska JF, Cohen DAD, Hyde ML, Prud'homme M (1989) A comparison of movement direction-related versus load direction-related activity in primate motor cortex, using a two-dimensional reaching task. J Neurosci 9: 2080–2102Google Scholar
  27. Lecas J-C, Requin J, Anger C, Vitton N (1986) Changes in neuronal activity of the monkey precentral cortex during preparation for movement. J Neurophysiol 56: 1680–1702Google Scholar
  28. Lemon RN, Mantel GWH, Muir RB (1986) Corticospinal facilitation of hand muscles during voluntary movement in the conscious monkey. J Physiol (London) 381: 497–527Google Scholar
  29. Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin JH, Ghez C (1985) Task-related coding of stimulus and response in cat motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 57: 427–442Google Scholar
  31. Massey JT, Schwartz AB, Georgopoulos AP (1986) On information processing and performing a movement sequence. Exp Brain Res Suppl 15: 242–251Google Scholar
  32. Mountcastle VB, Reitboeck HJ, Poggio GF, Steinmetz MA (1991) Adaptation of the Reitboeck method of multiple microelectrode recording to the neocortex of the waking monkey. J Neurosci Methods 36: 77–84Google Scholar
  33. Pylyshyn ZW (1981) The imagery debate: analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychol Rev 88: 16–45Google Scholar
  34. Richle A, Requin J (1989) Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 61: 534–549Google Scholar
  35. Schwartz AB, Kettner RE, Georgopoulos AP (1988) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. 1. Relations between single cell discharge and direction of movement. J Neurosci 8: 2913–2927Google Scholar
  36. Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171: 701–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shepard RN, Cooper L (1982) Mental images and their transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Shinoda Y, Yokota JI, Futami T (1981) Divergent projections of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey. Neurosci Lett 23: 7–12Google Scholar
  39. Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  40. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Steinmetz MA, Motter BC, Duffy CJ, Mountcastle VB (1987) Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: Radial organization of directionalities within the visual field. J Neurosci 7: 177–191Google Scholar
  42. Tanji J, Evarts EV (1976) Anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons in relation to direction of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 39: 1062–1068Google Scholar
  43. Tanji J, Kurata K (1985) Contrasting neuronal activity in supplementary and precentral motor cortex of monkeys. I. Responses to instructions determining motor responses to forthcoming signals of different modalities. J Neurophysiol 53: 129–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Thach WT (1978) Correlation of neural discharge with pattern and force of muscular activity, joint position, and direction of intended next movement in motor cortex and cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 41: 654–676Google Scholar
  45. Weinrich M, Wise SP, Mauritz K-H (1984) A neurophysiological study of the premotor cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain 107: 385–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. 2nd edn. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, 1971Google Scholar
  47. Wise SP, Weinrich M, Mauritz K-H (1986) Movement-related activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus macaques. Prog Brain Res 64: 117–131PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. Lurito
    • 1
  • T. Georgakopoulos
    • 1
  • A. P. Georgopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.The Philip Bard Laboratories of Neurophysiology, Department of NeuroscienceThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations