Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 345–354 | Cite as

A new technique to classify the compatibility of wood with cement

  • M. Hachmi
  • A. A. Moslemi
  • A. G. Campbell


Wood-cement panels have commanded renewed interest during the last decade because of their potential application in the building industry. Several methods to classify wood of various species regarding its compatibility with cement have been established in the literature based on hydration measurements in Dewar flasks. These ranking methods lack consistency in the classification of species because the hydration conditions vary among laboratories. Three techniques for evaluating wood-cement compatibility were established and compared. The best technique is based on a wood-cement compatibility factor which is the ratio of the area under the wood-cement hydration heat rate curve to that of neat cement. The area is calculated on 24-h basis starting from the initial cement set time. This area ratio method ranks species over a 100% scale and accounts well for species that are totally incompatible.


Hydration Rate Curve Hydration Condition Ratio Method Ranking Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahn, W. Y.; Moslemi, A. A. 1980: SEM examination of wood-portland cement bonds. Wood Sci. 13: 77–82Google Scholar
  2. American Standard for Test Method 1982: Heat of hydration of hydraulic cement. ASTM C186-82Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous 1973: Chemical engineers' handbook. 5. Ed., pp. 3–136.Google Scholar
  4. Dinwoodie, J. M.; Paxton, B. M. 1983: Wood cement particleboard — A technical assessment. Building Research Establishment Information Paper. IP 4/83: 1–4Google Scholar
  5. Hachmi, M. 1988: Important considerations in wood-cement compatibility. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Hofstrand, A. D.; Moslemi, A. A.; Garcia, J. F. 1984: Curing characteristics of wood particle from nine northern Rocky Mountain species mixed with portland cement. Forest Prod. J. 34: 57–61Google Scholar
  7. Kollmann, F. F. P.; Côté, W. A. Jr. 1968: Principles of wood science and technology, Vol. I: Solid Wood, pp. 240–257. Berlin Heidelberg New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller, D. P. 1987: Wood-cement composites: interactions of wood components with portland cement. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Mindess, S.; Young, J. F. 1981: Concrete. pp. 76–111. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  10. Moslemi, A. A.; Lim, Y. T. 1984: Compatibility of southern hardwoods with portland cement. Forest Prod. J. 34: 22–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Parameswaran, V. N.; Bröker, F. W. 1979: Micromorphological investigation on wood-cement composites after long-term use. Holzforschung 33: 97–102Google Scholar
  12. Parameswaran, V. N.; Bröker, F. W.; Simatupang, M. H. 1977: Microtechnological studies on mineral-bonded wood composites. Interaction between binders and wood. Holzforschung 31: 173–178Google Scholar
  13. Sandermann, W.; Preusser, H. J.; Schweers, W. 1960: The effect of wood extractives on the setting of cement-bonded wood materials. Holzforschung 14: 70–77Google Scholar
  14. Sandermann, W; Kohler, R. 1964: Studies on mineral-bonded wood materials. IV. A short test of the aptitudes of woods for cement-bonded materials. Holzforschung 18: 53–59Google Scholar
  15. Simatupang, M. H. 1979: The water requirement in production of cement-bonded wood particleboard. Holz Roh-Werkst 37: 379–382Google Scholar
  16. Weatherwax, R. C.; Tarkow, H. 1964: Effect of wood on setting of Portland cement. Forest Prod. J. 14: 567–570Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hachmi
    • 1
  • A. A. Moslemi
    • 2
  • A. G. Campbell
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecole Nationale Forestière d'IngénieursTabriquet SaléMorocco
  2. 2.Department of Forest ProductsUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations