Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 194–200 | Cite as

Segregation of random amplified DNA markers in F1 progeny of conifers

  • J. E. Carlson
  • L. K. Tulsieram
  • J. C. Glaubitz
  • V. W. K. Luk
  • C. Kauffeldt
  • R. Rutledge


The recently developed approach to deriving genetic markers via amplification of random DNA segments with single primers of arbitrary nucleotide sequence was tested for its utility in genetic linkage mapping studies with conifers. Reaction conditions were optimized to reproducibly yield clean and specific amplification products. Template DNA from several genotypes of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and white spruce (Picea glauca) were tested against eight ten-base oligonucleotide primers. Most of the tested primer/parent tree combinations yielded polymorphic PCR products (“RAPD” markers). Selected primers were then used in PCR reactions with template DNA isolated from offspring in Douglas-fir and black spruce diallel crosses among the same parental lines. The diallel study confirmed the appropriate inheritance of RAPD markers in the F1 generation. The value of these dominant RAPD markers for genetic linkage mapping in trees was established from both theoretical and applied perspectives.

Key words

Conifers genetic markers Linkage mapping Random amplified DNA markers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard RW (1956) Formulas and tables to facilitate the calculation of recombination values in heredity. Hilgardia 24:235–278Google Scholar
  2. Beavis WD, Grant D (1991) A linkage map based on information from F2 populations of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 82:636–644Google Scholar
  3. Beckman JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic improvement of agricultural species. Euphytica 35:111–124Google Scholar
  4. Beckman JS, Soller M (1988) Detection of linkage between marker loci affecting quantitative traits in crosses between segregating populations. Theor Appl Genet 76:228–236Google Scholar
  5. Bernatzky R, Tanksley S (1986) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112:887–898Google Scholar
  6. Blake TK (1990) RFLP analysis in barley: Making the technology accessible. Agric Can Biocrop Network RFLP Workshop. Manitoba, Canada, p 4 (abstr)Google Scholar
  7. Bousquet J, Simon L, Lalonde M (1990) DNA amplification from vegetative and sexual tissues of trees using polymerase chain reaction. Can J For Res 20:254–257Google Scholar
  8. Burr B, Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize: theoretical and practical considerations. TIG 7:55–60Google Scholar
  9. Chang C, Bowman JL, DeJohn AW, Lander ES, Meyerowitz EM (1988) Restriction fragment length polymorphism linkage map for Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6856–6860Google Scholar
  10. Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and type of gene action. Genetics 116:113–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grant D, Blair D, Behrendsen W, Meier R, Beavis W, Bowen S, Tenborg R, Martich J, Fincher R, Smith S, Simth H, Keaschall J (1988) Identification of quantitative-trait loci for plant height and ear height using RFLP's. Maize Coop News 62:71–73Google Scholar
  12. Harvey MJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1989) Linkages between restriction fragment length, isozyme and morphological markers in lentil. Theor Appl Genet 77:395–401Google Scholar
  13. Hayashi K, Orita M, Suzuki Y, Sekiya T (1989) Use of labelled primers in polymerase chain reaction (LP-PCR) for a rapid detection of the product. Nucleic Acids Res 9:3605Google Scholar
  14. Helentjaris H (1987) A genetic linkage map for maize based on RFLPs. TIG 3:217–221Google Scholar
  15. Helentjaris R, Slocum M, Wright S, Schaeffer A, Nienhuis J (1986) Construction of genetic linkage maps in maize and tomato using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 72:761–769Google Scholar
  16. Kam-Morgan LNW, Gill BS (1989) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms: a strategy for genetic mapping of D genome of wheat. Genome 32:724–732Google Scholar
  17. Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Landry BS, Kessell R, Farrara B, Michelmore RW (1987) A genetic map of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) with restriction fragment length polymorphism, isozyme, disease resistance and morphological markers. Genetics 116:331–337Google Scholar
  19. McCouch SR, Krochert G, Yu ZH, Wang ZY, Kush GS, Coffman WR, Tanksley SD (1988) Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 76:815–829Google Scholar
  20. Nam H-G, Giraudat J, den Boer B, Moonan F, Loos WDB, Hauge BM, Goodman HM (1989) Restriction fragment length polymorphism linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 1:699–705Google Scholar
  21. Namkoong G, Conkle MT (1976) Time trends in genetic control of height growth in Ponderosa pine. For Sci 22:2–12Google Scholar
  22. Namkoong G, Usanis RA, Silen RR (1972) Age-related variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas fir. Theor Appl Genet 42:151–159Google Scholar
  23. Nienhuis J, Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Ruggero B, Schaefer A (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with insect resistance in tomato. Crop Sci 27:797–803Google Scholar
  24. Nilan RA (1990) The North American barley genome mapping project. Agric Can Biocrop Network RFLP Workshop. Manitoba, Canada, p 5 (abstr)Google Scholar
  25. Osborn TC, Alexander DC, Fobes JF (1987) Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theor Appl Genet 73:350–356Google Scholar
  26. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335:721–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Slocum MK, Figdore SS, Kennard WC, Suzuki YK, Osborn TC (1990) Linkage arrangement of restriction fragment length polymorphism loci in Brassica oleraceae. Theor Appl Genet 80:57–64Google Scholar
  28. Soller M, Beckman JS (1990) Marker-based mapping of quantitative trait loci using replicated progenies. Theor Appl Genet 80:205–208Google Scholar
  29. Stuber CF, Edwards MD, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: II Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci 27:639–648Google Scholar
  30. Tulsieram LK, Morris R, Compton WA, Thomas-Compton M (1991) Analysis of genetic recombination in maize populations using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  31. Wagner DB, Furnier GR, Saghai-Maroof MA, Williams SM, Dancik BP, Allard RW (1987) Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in lodgepole and jack pines and their hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2097–2100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Weller JI, Soller M, Brody T (1988) Linkage analysis of quantative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycoperscion pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118:329–339Google Scholar
  33. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Carlson
    • 1
  • L. K. Tulsieram
    • 1
  • J. C. Glaubitz
    • 1
  • V. W. K. Luk
    • 1
  • C. Kauffeldt
    • 2
  • R. Rutledge
    • 2
  1. 1.The Biotechnology Laboratory and the Faculty of Forestry at the University of British ColumbiaVancouver, B.C.Canada
  2. 2.Forestry Canada, Petawawa National Forestry InstituteChalk RiverCanada

Personalised recommendations