Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 121–129 | Cite as

Genetic and molecular analysis of tissue-culture-derived Ac elements

  • V. M. Peschke
  • R. L. Phillips
  • B. G. Gengenbach
Originals

Summary

Our previous experiments on maize (Zea mays L.) plants regenerated from tissue culture revealed genetic activity characteristic of the transposable element Activator (Ac) in the progeny of 2–3% of the plants tested, despite the lack of Ac activity in the progenitor plants. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the presence of Ac activity in tissue-culture-derived plants was associated with changes in the number or structure of Ac-homologous DNA sequences. Families segregating for Ac activity were obtained by crossing plants heterozygous for Ac activity onto Ac-responsive tester plants. A DNA probe derived from a previously isolated Ac sequence was used to examine the Ac-homologous sequences within individual progeny seedlings of segregating families and noncultured control materials. All plants tested had six or more Ac-homologous DNA sequences, regardless of whether Ac activity was present. In the segregating progeny of one tissue-culturederived plant, a 30-kb Ac-homologous SstI restriction fragment and a 10-kb Ac-homologous BglII restriction fragment were found to cosegregate with Ac activity. We propose that these fragments contained a previously silent Ac sequence that had been activated during tissue culture. Although one or more Ac sequences were often hypomethylated at internal PvuII and HpaII sites in plants with Ac activity, hypomethylation was not a prerequisite for activity. Reduced methylation at these sites may have been a result rather than a cause of Ac activity.

Key words

Zea mays L. Somaclonal variation Activator (AcMethylation Tissue culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks JA, Masson P, Fedoroff N (1988) Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize Suppressor-mutator transposable element. Genes Dev 2:1364–1380Google Scholar
  2. Benner MS, Phillips RL, Kirihara JA, Messing JW (1989) Genetic analysis of methionine-rich storage protein accumulation in maize. Theor Appl Genet 78:761–767Google Scholar
  3. Bennetzen JL (1987) Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Mol Gen Genet 208:45–51Google Scholar
  4. Bennetzen JL, Brown WE, Springer PS (1988) The state of DNA modification within and flanking maize transposable elements. In: Nelson O (ed) Plant transposable elements. Plenum Press, New York, pp 237–250Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi A, Salamini F, Parlavecchio R (1969) On the origin of controlling elements in maize. Genet Agrar 22:335–344Google Scholar
  6. Brown PTH (1989) DNA methylation in plants and its role in tissue culture. Genome 31:717–729Google Scholar
  7. Brown PTH, Lorz H (1986) Molecular changes and possible origins of somaclonal variation. In: Semal J (ed) Somaclonal variation and crop improvement. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 148–159Google Scholar
  8. Chandler VL, Walbot V (1986) DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1767–1771Google Scholar
  9. Chandler VL, Talbert LE, Raymond F (1988) Sequence, genomic distribution and DNA modification of a Mu1 element from non-mutator maize stocks. Genetics 119:951–958Google Scholar
  10. Chomet PS, Wessler S, Dellaporta SL (1987) Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO J 6:295–302Google Scholar
  11. Cone KC, Burr FA, Burr B (1986) Molecular analysis of the maize anthocyanin regulatory locus C1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9631–9635Google Scholar
  12. Culley DE (1986) Evidence for the activation of a cryptic transposable element Ac in maize endosperm cultures. In: Proc 6th Int Congr Plant Tiss Cell Cult, Minneapolis/MN, p 220 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Dennis ES, Finnegan EJ, Taylor BH, Peterson TA, Walker AR, Peacock WJ (1988) Maize transposable elements: structure, function, and regulation. In: Nelson O (ed) Plant transposable elements. Plenum Press, New York, pp 101–113Google Scholar
  14. Doerschug EB (1973) Studies of Dotted, a regulatory element in maize. 1. Induction of Dotted by chromosome breaks. 2. Phase variation of Dotted. Theor Appl Genet 43:182–189Google Scholar
  15. Evola SV, Burr FA, Burr B (1984) The nature of tissue-cultureinduced mutations in maize. In: Proc 11th Annual Aharon Katzir-Katchalsky Conf, 8–13 January 1984, Jerusalem, (Abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Evola SV, Tuttle A, Burr F, Burr B (1985) Tissue-culture-associated variability in maize: molecular and genetic studies. In: Proc 1st Int Congr Plant Mol Biol, Savannah/GA, p 10 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Fedoroff NV (1989) The heritable activation of cryptic Suppressor-mutator elements by an active element. Genetics 121:591–608Google Scholar
  18. Fedoroff NV, Banks JA (1988) Is the Suppressor-mutator element controlled by a basic developmental regulatory mechanism? Genetics 120:559–577Google Scholar
  19. Fedoroff N, Wessler S, Shure M (1983) Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell 35:235–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132:6–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gierl A, Lutticke S, Saedler H (1988) TnpA product encoded by the transposable element En-1 of Zea mays is a DNA binding protein. EMBO J 7:4045–4053Google Scholar
  22. Groose RW, Bingham ET (1986) An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). 1. High frequency of reversion upon reculture. 2. Stable nonrevertants derived from reculture. Plant Cell Rep 5:104–110Google Scholar
  23. Gruenbaum Y, Naveh-Many T, Cedar H (1981) Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292:860–862Google Scholar
  24. James MG, Stadler J (1989) Molecular characterization of Mutator systems in maize embryogenic callus cultures indicates Mu activity in vitro. Theor Appl Genet 77:383–393Google Scholar
  25. Johns MA, Mottinger J, Freeling M (1985) A low copy number, copia-like transposon in maize. EMBO J 4:1093–1102Google Scholar
  26. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214Google Scholar
  27. Lee M (1984) Cytogenetic analysis and progeny evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) plants regenerated from organogenic callus cultures. MS thesis, University of Minnesota, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee M, Phillips RL (1988) The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39:413–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McClintock B (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:344–355Google Scholar
  30. McClintock B (1958) The Suppressor-mutator system of control of gene action in maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbk 57:415–429Google Scholar
  31. McClintock B (1959) Genetic and cytological studies of maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbk 58:452–456Google Scholar
  32. McClintock B (1971) The contribution of one component of a control system to versatility of gene expression. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbk 70:5–17Google Scholar
  33. McClintock B (1978) Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Genet Symp 10:25–47Google Scholar
  34. McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792–801Google Scholar
  35. Müller-Neumann M, Yoder JI, Starlinger P (1984) The DNA sequence of the transposable element Ac of Zea mays L. Mol Gen Genet 198:19–24; Mol Gen Genet 198:540Google Scholar
  36. Neuffer MG (1966) Stability of the suppressor element in two mutator systems of the Ai locus in maize. Genetics 53:541–549Google Scholar
  37. Peschke VM, Phillips RL (1991) Activation of the maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 81:90–97Google Scholar
  38. Peschke VM, Phillips RL, Gengenbach BG (1987) Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue-culture-derived maize plants. Science 238:804–807Google Scholar
  39. Peterson PA (1953) A mutable pale-green locus in maize. Genetics 38:682–683Google Scholar
  40. Phillips RL, Peschke VM (1988) Discovery of Ac activity among progeny of tissue-culture-derived maize plants. In: Nelson O (ed) Plant transposable elements. Plenum Press, New York, pp 305–315Google Scholar
  41. Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Peschke VM (1990) Do we understand somaclonal variation? In: Nijkamp HJJ, Van Der Plas LHW, Van Aartrijk J (eds) Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. Proc 7th Int Congr Plant Tiss Cell Cult. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 131–141Google Scholar
  42. Planckaert F, Walbot V (1989) Molecular and genetic characterization of Mu transposable elements in Zea mays: behavior in callus culture and regenerated plants. Genetics 122:567–578Google Scholar
  43. Pohlman RF, Fedoroff NV, Messing J (1984) The nucleotide sequence of the maize transposable element Activator. Cell 37:635–643; Cell 39:417Google Scholar
  44. Reed KC, Mann DA (1985) Rapid transfer of DNA from agarose gels to nylon membranes. Nucleic Acid Res 13:7207–7221Google Scholar
  45. Rhoades MM, Dempsey E (1982) The induction of mutable systems in plants with the high-loss mechanism. Maize Genet Coop News Lett 56:21–26Google Scholar
  46. Schnable PS, Peterson PA (1989) Genetic evidence of a relationship between two maize transposable element systems: Cy and Mutator. Mol Gen Genet 215:317–321Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz D (1989) Gene-controlled cytosine demethylation in the promoter region of the Ac transposable element in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:2789–2793Google Scholar
  48. Schwartz D, Dennis E (1986) Transposase activity of the Ac controlling element in maize is regulated by its degree of methylation. Mol Gen Genet 205:476–482Google Scholar
  49. Shure M, Wessier S, Fedoroff N (1983) Molecular identification and isolation of the waxy locus in maize. Cell 35:225–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Walbot V (1988) Reactivation of the Mutator transposable element system following gamma irradiation of seed. Mol Gen Genet 212:259–264Google Scholar
  51. Walbot V, Britt AB, Luehrsen K, McLaughlin M, Warren C (1988) Regulation of mutator activities in maize. In: Nelson O (ed) Plant transposable elements. Plenum Press, New York, pp 121–135Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. M. Peschke
    • 1
  • R. L. Phillips
    • 1
  • B. G. Gengenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics and the Plant Molecular Genetics InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations