Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 79, Issue 4, pp 497–506 | Cite as

Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs)

3. Genome relationships in Brassica and related genera and the origin of B. oleracea and B. rapa (syn. campestns)
  • K. Song
  • T. C. Osborn
  • P. H. Williams


RFLPs were used to study genome evolution and phylogeny in Brassica and related genera. Thirtyeight accessions, including 10 accessions of B. rapa (syn. campestris), 9 cultivated types of B. oleracea, 13 nine-chromosome wild brassicas related to B. oleracea, and 6 other species in Brassica and allied genera, were examined with more then 30 random genomic DNA probes, which identified RFLPs mapping to nine different linkage groups of the B. rapa genome. Based on the RFLP data, phylogenetic trees were constructed using the PAUP microcomputer program. Within B. rapa, accessions of pak choi, narinosa, and Chinese cabbage from East Asia constituted a group distinct from turnip and wild European populations, consistent with the hypothesis that B. rapa had two centers of domestication. A wild B. rapa accession from India was positioned in the tree between European types and East Asian types, suggesting an evolutionary pathway from Europe to India, then to South China. Cultivated B. oleracea morphotypes showed monophyletic origin with wild B. oleracea or B. alboglabra as possible ancestors. Various kales constitute a highly diverse group, and represent the primitive morphotypes of cultivated B. oleracea from which cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, etc. probably have evolved. Cauliflower was found to be closely related to broccoli, whereas cabbage was closely related to leafy kales. A great diversity existed among the 13 collections of nine-chromosome wild brassicas related to B. oleracea, representing various taxonomic states from subspecies to species. Results from these studies suggested that two basic evolutionary pathways exist for the diploid species examined. One pathway gave rise to B. fruticulosa, B. nigra, and Sinapis arvensis, with B. adpressa or a close relative as the initial ancestor. Another pathway gave rise to B. oleracea and B. rapa, with Diplotaxis erucoides or a close relative as the initial ancestor. Raphanus sativus and Eruca sativus represented intermediate types between the two lineages, and might have been derived from introgression or hybridization between species belonging to different lineages. Molecular evidence for an ascending order of chromosome numbers in the evolution of Brassica and allied genera was obtained on the basis of RFLP data and phylogenetic analysis.

Key words

Brassica Molecular taxonomy Genome evolution Phylogenetic analysis Restriction fragment length polymorphism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attia T, Robbelen G (1986) Cytogenetic relationship within cultivated Brassica analyzed in amphidiploids from the three diploid ancestors. Can J Genet Cytol 28:323–329Google Scholar
  2. Delourme R, Eber F, Chevre AM (1990) Intergeneric hybridization of Diplotaxis erucoides with Brassica napus. Euphytica (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Fink WL (1986) Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis. Science 234:1135–1139Google Scholar
  4. Jahier J, Chevre AM, Tanguy AM, Eber F (1989) Extraction of disomic addition lines of Brassica napus-B. nigra. Genome 32:408–413Google Scholar
  5. Lakshmikumaran M, Ranade S, Gupta V, Agnihotri A, Dhillon HS, Jagannathan V (1988) Sequence analysis and evolution of a tandemly repeated DNA of Brassica campestris. 2nd Int Cong Plant Mol Biol, Jerusalem, Nov. 13–18, Abstr 599Google Scholar
  6. Li CW (1980) The origin, evolution, taxonomy, and hybridization of Chinese cabbage. In: Talekar NS, Griggs TD (eds) Chinese cabbage. Asian Vegetable Research Center, Taiwan, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  7. Mithen RF, Lewis BG, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR (1987) Glucosinolates of wild and cultivated Brassica species. Phytochemistry 26:1969–1973Google Scholar
  8. Mizushima U (1980) Genome analysis in Brassica and allied genera. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Japanese Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, pp 89–105Google Scholar
  9. Morinaga T (1929) Interspecific hybridization in Brassica. 1. The cytology of F1 hybrids of B. napella and various other species with ten chromosomes. Cytologia 1:16–27Google Scholar
  10. Osborn TC, Alexander DC, Fobes JF (1987) Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphism linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theor Appl Genet 73:350–356Google Scholar
  11. Palmer JD, Shield CR, Cohen DB, Orton TJ (1983) Chloroplast DNA evolution and the origin of amphidiploid Brassica species. Theor Appl Genet 65:181–189Google Scholar
  12. Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics, and origin of crop Brassica, a review. Opera Bot 55:1–57Google Scholar
  13. Quiros CF, Ochoa O, Kianian SF, Douches D (1986) Evolutionary trends in Brassica: Gathering evidence from chromosome addition lines. Cruciferae Newslett 11:22–23Google Scholar
  14. Quiros CF, Ochoa O, Douches D (1988) Exploring the role of x=7 species in Brassica evolution: Hybridization with B. nigra and B. oleracea. J Hered 79:351–358Google Scholar
  15. Robbelen G (1960) Beiträge zur Analyse des Brassica-Genomes. Chromosoma II:205–228Google Scholar
  16. Slocum MK, Figdore SS, Kennard WC, Suzuki JY, Osborn TC (1990) The linkage arrangement of restriction fragment length polymorphism loci in Brassica oleracea. Theor Appl Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Snogerup S (1980) The wild forms of the Brassica oleracea group (2n=18) and the possible relations to the cultivated ones. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Japanese Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, pp121–132Google Scholar
  18. Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988a) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). 1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphidiploid species. Theor Appl Genet 75:784–794Google Scholar
  19. Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988b) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). 2. Preliminary analysis of subspecies within B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea. Theor Appl Genet 76:593–600Google Scholar
  20. U N (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452Google Scholar
  21. Wills AB (1966) Meiotic behavior in the Brassiceae. Caryologia 19:103–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. C. Osborn
    • 2
  • P. H. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations