Trees

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 78–85 | Cite as

Growth and nutrition of birch seedlings in relation to potassium supply rate

  • Tom Ericsson
  • Monika Kähr
Original Articles

Summary

Growth of hydroponically cultivated birch seedlings (Betula pendula Roth.) at sub- and supra-optimum potassium supply rates was investigated. Potassium was supplied either as a relative addition rate (rk = 5, 10, 15 and 20% increase day-1) or as fixed concentrations (0.2, 3, 6, 12 and 15 mM) in the culture solution. After an acclimation period the growth rate of the seedlings in the suboptimum treatments reached values close to the treatment variable, the relative rate of K-addition. Deficiency symptoms, in the form of chlorosis and necroses along the leaf margins, developed initially in all suboptimum treatments, but very few new symptoms appeared once the seedlings had reached the phase of steady-state nutrition and growth. At supra-optimum K-supply levels, i.e. at 0.2–15 mM K in the culture solution, no symptoms of deficiency or toxicity developed, and the relative growth rate of the seedlings remained maximum. The relative growth rate of the seedlings was linearly related to the plant K-status for K contents ranging from 0.2 to 1.0% of dry weight (DW). At higher internal K-concentrations, 1.0–3.0% DW, no further increase in relative growth rate was achieved. A shortage of K resulted in a decrease in the net assimilation rate. This effect was counterbalanced by the absence of shift in he leaf weight ratio as well as by the production of relatively thin leaves. The fraction of dry matter allocated to roots decreased in K-limited plants, as did the leaf contents of soluble carbohydrates and starch.

Key words

Betula pendula Dry matter distribution Leaf area ratio Leaf weight ratio Net assimilation rate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher CJ, Ozanne PG (1967) Growth and potassium content of plants in solution cultures maintained at constant potassium concentrations. Soil Sci 103: 155–161Google Scholar
  2. Beadle CL (1985) Plant growth analysis. In: Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, Scurlock JMO (eds) Techniques in bioproductivity and photosynthesis. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Brouwer R (1962) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10: 399–408Google Scholar
  4. Christersson L (1973) The effect of inorganic nutrients on water economy and hardiness of conifers. I. The effect of varying potassium, calcium and magnesium levels on water content, transpiration rate, and the initial phase of development of frost hardiness of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings. Stud For Suec 103: 5–26Google Scholar
  5. Christersson L (1976) The effect of inorganic nutrients on water economy and hardiness of conifers. II. The effect of varying potassium and calcium contents on water status and drought hardiness of pot-grown Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L) Karst, seedlings. Stud For Suec 136: 5–23Google Scholar
  6. Ericsson T (1981) Effects of varied nitrogen stress on growth and nutrition in three Salix clones. Physiol Plant 51: 423–429Google Scholar
  7. Ericsson T (1990) Dry matter partitioning at steady state nutrition. In: Persson H (ed) Above and below-ground interactions in forest trees in acidified soils. Air pollution research report 32, Commission of the European Communites, Brussels, pp 236–243Google Scholar
  8. Ericsson T, Ingestad T (1988) Nutrition and growth of birch seedlings at varied relative phosphorus addition rates. Physiol Plant 72: 227–235Google Scholar
  9. Estes GO, Koch DW, Bruetsch TF (1973) Influence of potassium nutrition on net CO2 uptake and growth in maize (Zea mays L.). Agron J 65: 972–975Google Scholar
  10. Evans HJ, Sorger GJ (1966) Role of mineral elements with emphasis on the univalent cations. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 17: 47–76Google Scholar
  11. Gabelman WH (1976) Genetic potentials in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium efficiency. In: Wright MJ (ed) Plant adaptation to mineral stress in problem soils. Beltsville Md., 22–23 November 1976, pp 205–212Google Scholar
  12. Gerloff GC (1976) Plant efficiencies in the use of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. In: Wright MJ (ed) Plant adaptation to mineral stress in problem soils, Beltsville, Md., 22–23 November 1976, pp 161–173Google Scholar
  13. Hackett C (1968) A study of the root system of barley. 1. Effects of nutrition on two varieties. New Phytol 67: 287–299Google Scholar
  14. Hommels CH, Kuiper PJC, de Haan A (1989) Responses to internal potassium concentration of two Taraxacum microspecies of contrasting mineral ecology: the role of inorganic ions in growth. Physiol Plant 77: 562–568Google Scholar
  15. Ingestad T (1971) A definition of optimum nutrient requirements in birch seedlings. Physiol Plant 24: 118–125Google Scholar
  16. Ingestad T (1979) Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. II. N, K, P, Ca, and Mg nutrition. Physiol Plant 45: 149–157Google Scholar
  17. Ingestad T (1980) Growth, nutrition, and nitrogen fixation in grey alder at varied rate of relative nitrogen addition. Physiol Plant 50: 353–364Google Scholar
  18. Ingestad T (1981) Nutrition and growth of birch and grey alder seedlings in low conductivity solutions and at varied relative rates of nutrient addition. Physiol Plant 52:454–466Google Scholar
  19. Ingestad T (1982) Relative addition rate and external concentration; Driving variables used in plant nutrition research. Plant Cell Environ 5:443–453Google Scholar
  20. Ingestad T, Ågren G (1988) Nutrient uptake and allocation at steady-state nutrition. Physiol Plant 72: 450–459Google Scholar
  21. Ingestad T, Kähr M (1985) Nutrition and growth of coniferous seedlings at varied relative nitrogen addition rate. Physiol Plant 65: 109–116Google Scholar
  22. Ingestad T, Lund A-B (1979) Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. I. Growth technique and growth. Physiol Plant 45: 137–148Google Scholar
  23. Ingestad T, Lund A-B (1986) Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants. Scand J For Res 1: 439–453Google Scholar
  24. Ingestad T, McDonald AJS (1989) Interaction between nitrogen and photon flux density in birch seedlings at steady-state nutrition. Physiol Plant 77: 1–11Google Scholar
  25. Jia H, Ingestad T (1984) Nutrient requirements and stress response of Populus simonii and Paulownia tomentosa. Physiol Plant 62: 117–124Google Scholar
  26. Kramer PJ (1983) Water relations of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsson S, Wirén A, Lundgren L, Ericsson T (1986) Effects of light and nutrient stress on leaf phenolic chemistry in Salix dasyclados and susceptibility to Galerucella lineola (Coleoptera). Oikos 47: 205–210Google Scholar
  28. Leigh RA, Chater M, Storey R, Johnston AE (1986) Accumulation and subcellular distribution of cations in relation to the growth of potassium-deficient barley. Plant Cell Environ 9: 595–604Google Scholar
  29. Lewitt J (1956) The hardiness of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Linder S, Rook DA (1984) Effects of mineral nutrition on carbon dioxide exchange and partitioning of carbon in trees. In: Bowen GD, Nambiar EKS (eds) Nutrition of plantation forests. Academic Press, London, pp 211–236Google Scholar
  31. Lüttge U, Clarkson DT (1989) Mineral nutrition: Potassium. In: Behnke H-D, Esser K, Kubitzki K, Runge M, Ziegler H (eds) Progress in botany, vol 50. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 51–73Google Scholar
  32. Marschner H (1986) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Matches AG, Mott GO, Bula RJ (1962) Vegetative development of alfalfa seedlings under varying levels of shading and potassium fertilization. Agron J 54: 541–543Google Scholar
  34. McDonald AJS, Ericson A, Lohammar T (1986a) Dependence of starch storage on nutrient availability and photon flux density in small birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Plant Cell Environ 9: 433–438Google Scholar
  35. McDonald AJS, Lohammar T, Ericcson A (1986b) Growth response to step-decrease in nutrient availability in small birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Plant Cell Environ 9:427–432Google Scholar
  36. Nitos RE, Evans HJ (1969) Effects of univalent cations on the activity of paniculate starch synthetase. Plant Physiol 44: 1260–1266Google Scholar
  37. Petterson S (1986) Growth, contents of K+ and kinetics of K+ (86Rb) uptake in barley cultured at different low supply rates of potassium. Physiol Plant 66: 122–128Google Scholar
  38. Peoples T, Koch DW (1979) Role of potassium in carbon dioxide assimilation in Medicago sativa L. Plant Physiol 63: 878–881Google Scholar
  39. Roberts TM, Skeffington RA, Blank LW (1989) Causes of type 1 spruce decline in Europe. Forestry 62: 179–221Google Scholar
  40. Statgraphics (1988) Statistical Graphics System by Statistical Graphics Corporation. STSC Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Steen E, Larsson K (1986) Carbohydrates in roots and rhizomes of perennial grasses. New Phytol 104: 339–346Google Scholar
  42. Terry N, Ulrich A (1973) Effects of potassium deficiency on the photosynthesis and respiration of leaves of sugar beet under conditions of low sodium supply. Plant Physiol 51: 1099–1101Google Scholar
  43. Thorsteinsson B, Tillberg J-E (1987). Carbohydrate partitioning and growth in Lemna gibba L. G3. II. The effects of phosporus limitation. Physiol Plant 71: 272–276Google Scholar
  44. Waring RH, McDonald AJS, Larsson S, Ericsson T, Wirén A, Arwidsson E, Ericsson A, Lohammar T (1985) Differences in chemical composition of plants grown at constant relative growth rates whith stable mineral nutrition. Oecologia 66: 157–160Google Scholar
  45. Wild A, Skarlou V, Clement CR, Snaydon RW (1974) Comparison of potassium uptake by four plant species grown in sand and flowing solution culture. J Appl Ecol 11: 801–812Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Ericsson
    • 1
  • Monika Kähr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Environmental ResearchSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations