Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 67–77 | Cite as

Growth, nutrition and gas exchange of Pinus resinosa following artificial defoliation

  • P. B. Reich
  • M. B. Walters
  • S. C. Krause
  • D. W. Vanderklein
  • K. F. Raffs
  • T. Tabone
Original Articles

Summary

In three experiments, red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) seedlings and trees were subjected to artificial defoliations of varying intensities and subsequent growth, gas exchange and nutritional responses were monitored. In Experiment 1, 2-year-old seedlings received 0, 1 or 2 50% defoliations during a single growing season and were maintained in 1 of 3 low nutrient supply treatments. In Experiment 2, response of 4-year-old seedlings was monitored in the year following 0, 25, 50 or 75% defoliation, while in Experiment 3, response of 11-year-old trees was measured 1 year after being defoliated by 0, 33 or 66%. Regardless of intensity of defoliation, or plant size, clipped plants made qualitatively similar allocational and metabolic adjustments over time. First, leaf diffusive conductance and rates of net photosynthesis were stimulated, especially by light to intermediate defoliation. However, there was no effect of defoliation on foliar nitrogen concentration, and elevated gas exchange rates apparently resulted from altered root-shoot dynamics. Second, allocation of new biomass was preferentially shifted towards foliage at the expense of roots, gradually restoring (but undershooting or overshooting) the ratio of foliage: roots of control plants. During the period when foliage: root balance was being restored, the stimulation of needle gas exchange rates disappeared. Plants defoliated by 25% overcompensated in terms of whole plant growth (were larger at harvest than controls), due to shifts in allocation and enhanced photosynthesis. Defoliated plants also stored a proportionally greater share of their carbohydrate reserves in roots than did control plants, even 1 year after clipping.

Key words

Allocation Defoliation Carbohydrate Herbivory Nutrition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderfer RG, Eagles CF (1976) The effect of partial defoliation on the growth and photosynthetic efficiency of bean leaves. Bot Gaz (Chicago) 137: 351–355Google Scholar
  2. Belsky AJ (1986) Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of the evidence. Am Nat 127: 870–892Google Scholar
  3. Bockheim JG, Leide JE, Tavella DS (1986) Distribution and cycling of macronutrients in a Pinus resinosa plantation fertilized with nitrogen and potassium. Can J For Res 16: 778–785Google Scholar
  4. Busso CA, Richards JH, Chatterton NJ (1990) Nonstructural carbohydrates and spring regrowth of two cool-season grasses: interaction of drought and clipping. J Range Manage 43: 336–343Google Scholar
  5. Caemmerer S von, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387Google Scholar
  6. Caemmerer S von, Farquhar GD (1984) Effects of partial defoliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced p(CO2) on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 160: 320–329Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell MM, Richards JH, Johnson DA, Nowak RS, Dzurec RS (1981) Coping with herbivory: photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses. Oecologia 50: 14–24Google Scholar
  8. Detling JK, Dyer MI, Winn DT (1979) Net photosynthesis, root respiration, and regrowth of Bouteloua gracillis following simulated grazing. Oecologia 41: 127–134Google Scholar
  9. Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1992) Leaf mass per area, nitrogen content and photosynthetic carbon gain in Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting forest light environments. Funct Ecol 6: 423–435Google Scholar
  10. Ericsson A, Hellkvist J, Hillerdal-Hagstromer K, Larsson S, Mattson-Djos E, Tenow O (1980) Consumption and pine growth — hypothesis on effects on growth processes by needle-eating insects. Ecol Bull 32:537–545Google Scholar
  11. Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 25–55Google Scholar
  12. Gunasekera D, Berkowitz GA (1992) Heterogenous stomatal closure in response to leaf water potential is not a universal phenomenon. Plant Physiol 98: 660–665Google Scholar
  13. Haissig BE, Dickson RE (1979) Starch measurement in plant tissue using enzymatic hydrolysis. Physiol Plant 47: 151–157Google Scholar
  14. Hansen J, Moller I (1975) Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Anal Biochem 68: 87–94Google Scholar
  15. Heichel GH, Turner NC (1983) CO2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple and red oak: response to defoliation. Oecologia 57: 14–19Google Scholar
  16. Ingestad T (1979) Mineral nutrient requirements of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings. Physiol Plant 45: 373–380Google Scholar
  17. Kruger EL (1992) Survival, growth, root: shoot relations and ecophysiology of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) and competing tree regeneration in response to fire and related disturbance. PhD Thesis, UW-MadisonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulman HM (1965) Effects of artificial defoliation of pine on subsequent shoot and needle growth. For Sci 11: 90–98Google Scholar
  19. Mattson WJ, Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol System 11: 119–161Google Scholar
  20. McNaughton SJ (1983) Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos 40: 329–336Google Scholar
  21. McNaughton SJ (1986) On plants and herbivores. Am Nat 128: 765–770Google Scholar
  22. McNaughton SJ, Chapin FS (1985) Effects of phosphorus nutrition and defoliation on C4 graminoids from the Serengeti plains. Ecology 66: 1617–1629Google Scholar
  23. Meinzer FC, Grantz DA (1990) Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity. Plant Cell Environ 13: 383–388Google Scholar
  24. Oesterheld M, McNaughton SJ (1988) Intraspecific variation in the response of Themeda triandra to defoliation: the effect of time of recovery and growth rates on compensatory growth. Oecologia 77: 181–186Google Scholar
  25. Olson BE, Senft RL, Richards JH (1989) A test of grazing compensation and optimization of crested wheatgrass using a simulation model. J Range Manage 42: 458–467Google Scholar
  26. O'Neill LC (1962) Some effects of artificial defoliation on the growth of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.). Can J Bot 40: 273–280Google Scholar
  27. Painter EL, Detling JK (1981) Effects of defoliation on net photosynthesis and regrowth of western wheatgrass. J Range Manage 34: 68–71Google Scholar
  28. Piene H (1980) Effects of insect defoliation on growth and foliar nutrients of young balsam fir. For Sci 26: 665–673Google Scholar
  29. Reich PB, Schoettle AW (1988) Role of phosphorus and nitrogen in photosynthetic and whole plant carbon gain and nutrient use efficiency in eastern white pine. Oecologia 77: 25–33Google Scholar
  30. Reich PB, Walters MB (1989) Response of Ulmus americana seedlings to varying nitrogen and water status. II. Water and nitrogen use efficiency in photosynthesis. Tree Physiol 5: 173–184Google Scholar
  31. Reich PB, Uhl C, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1991) Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 tree species in Amazonian forest communities. Oecologia 86: 16–24Google Scholar
  32. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf lifespan in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62: 365–392Google Scholar
  33. Richards JH, Caldwell MM (1985) Soluble carbohydrates, concurrent photosynthesis and efficiency in regrowth following defoliation: a field study with Agropyron species. J Appl Ecol 22: 907–920Google Scholar
  34. Tuomi J, Niemela P, Haukioja E, Siren SS, Neuvonen S (1984) Nutrient stress: an explanation for plant anti-herbivore response to defoliation. Oecologia 61: 208–210Google Scholar
  35. Valentine HT, Wallner WE, Wargo PW (1983) Nutritional changes in host foliage during and after defoliation, and their relation to the weight of gypsy moth pupae. Oecologia 57: 298–302Google Scholar
  36. Wagner MR, Evans PD (1985) Defoliation increases nutritional quality and allelochemics of pine seedlings. Oecologia 67: 235–237Google Scholar
  37. Wallace LL, McNaughton SJ, Coughenour MB (1984) Compensatory photosynthetic responses of three african graminoids to different fertilization, watering, and clipping regimes. Bot Gaz (Chicago) 145: 151–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. B. Reich
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. B. Walters
    • 1
    • 3
  • S. C. Krause
    • 2
  • D. W. Vanderklein
    • 1
    • 3
  • K. F. Raffs
    • 2
  • T. Tabone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ForestryUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations