Trees

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 44–49 | Cite as

Analysis of stand density effects on canopy structure: a conceptual approach

  • Steven B. Jack
  • James N. Long
Original Articles

Summary

A few assumptions were used to generate a series of specific, quantitative predictions for the relationships between stand density and various dimensional measures of canopy structure. The predictions, each indicating an increase in mean crown size as density decreased, appeared to be reasonable and intuitive. Predictions were compared to data for two conifer species with different crown forms, Pinus contorta var. latifolia and Abies lasiocarpa. Results of these comparisons were mixed — the linear, directly measured dimensions were consistent with predicted relationships, but dimensions calculated from the linear measures were not. Re-examination of the original assumptions indicated that the model should account for crown shyness (engagement/disengagement) to adequately reflect the influence of stand density on canopy structure. The results also indicated a strong association between stand height and measures of mean crown size. Mean crown size of lodgepole pine was altered much more by density than was mean crown size of subalpine fir, due primarily to the different relative shade tolerances of the two species. Some of the observed differences between species may also reflect the range of densities examined and uneven spacing in the unmanaged natural stands.

Key words

Crown dimensions Canopy structure Stand density Stand structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Beekhuis J (1965) Crown depth of radiata pine in relation to stand density and height, NZ J For 10: 43–61Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell MM (1987) Plant architecture and resource competition. In: Schulze E-D, Zwölfer H (eds) Potentials and limitations of ecosystem analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 164–179Google Scholar
  4. Curtis RO, Reukema DL (1970) Crown development and site estimates in a Douglas-fir plantation spacing test. For Sci 16: 287–301Google Scholar
  5. Czarnowski MS (1961) Dynamics of even-aged forest stands. La State Univ Stud Biol Sci Ser 4Google Scholar
  6. Elfron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1: 54–77Google Scholar
  7. Fowells HA, ed (1965) Silvics of forest trees of the United States. USDA For Serv Agric Handbook No 271Google Scholar
  8. Franco M (1986) The influence of neighbours on the growth of modular organisms with an example from trees. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 313: 209–225Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton GJ (1969) The dependence of volume increment of individual trees on dominance, crown dimensions, and competition. Forestry 49: 133–144Google Scholar
  10. Hart GE, Lomas DA (1979) Effects of clearcutting on soil water depletion in an Engelmann spruce stand. Water Resour Res 15: 1598–1602Google Scholar
  11. Kajihara M (1977) Studies on the morphology and dimensions of tree crowns in even-aged stand of Sugi (V): crown surface area and crown volume. J Jpn For Soc 59: 233–240Google Scholar
  12. Kanazawa Y, Kiyono Y, Fujimori T (1985) Crown development and stem growth in relation to stand density in even-aged stands (II) Clear-length model of Cryptomeria japonica stands as a function of stand density and tree height. J Jpn For Soc 67: 391–397Google Scholar
  13. Kellomäki S, Kuuluvainen T, Kurttio O (1986) Effect of crown shape, crown structure and stand density on the light absorption in a tree stand. In: Fujimori T, Whitehead D (eds) Crown and canopy structure in relation to primary productivity. Forestry and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, pp 339–359Google Scholar
  14. Krajicek JE, Brinkman KA, Gringrich SF (1961) Crown competition —measure of density. For Sci 7: 35–42Google Scholar
  15. Laduc DJ (1987) A comparative analysis of the reduced major axis technique for fitting lines to bivariate data. Can J For Res 17: 654–659Google Scholar
  16. Long JN (1985) A practical approach to density management. For Chron 61: 23–27Google Scholar
  17. Long JN, Smith FW (1984) Relation between size and density in developing stands: a description and possible mechanisms. For Ecol Manage 7: 191–206Google Scholar
  18. Long JN, Smith FW (1989) Estimating leaf area of Abies lasiocarpa across ranges of stand density and site quality. Can J For Res 19: 930–932Google Scholar
  19. Mohler CL, Marks PL, Sprugel DG (1978) Stand structure and allometry of trees during self-thinning of pure stands. J Ecol 66: 599–614Google Scholar
  20. Norberg R (1988) Theory of growth geometry of plants and self-thinning of plant populations: geometric similarity, elastic similarity, and different growth modes of plant parts. Am Nat 131: 220–256Google Scholar
  21. Putz FE, Parker GG, Archibald RM (1984) Mechanical abrasion and intercrown spacing. Am Midl Nat 112: 24–28Google Scholar
  22. Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res 46: 627–638Google Scholar
  23. Richards NA, Morrow RR, Stone EL (1962) Influence of soil and site on red pine plantations in New York. Cornell Univ Agric Expt Sta Bull 977Google Scholar
  24. SAS Institute Inc (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6 edition. SAS Insitute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  25. Schimpf DJ, Henderson JA, MacMahon J (1980) Some aspects of succession in the spruce-fir forest zone of northern Utah. Great Basin Nat 40: 1–26Google Scholar
  26. Seim E, Saether B-E (1983) On rethinking allometry: which regression model to use? J Theor Biol 104: 161–168Google Scholar
  27. Seymour RS, Smith DM (1987) A new stocking guide formulation applied to eastern white pine. For Sci 33: 469–484Google Scholar
  28. Stiell WM (1966) Red pine crown development in relation to spacing. Can Dept For Publ No 1145Google Scholar
  29. White J (1981) The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule. J Theor Biol 89: 475–500Google Scholar
  30. Wilson FG (1946) Numerical expression of stocking in terms of height. J For 44: 758–761Google Scholar
  31. Zeide B (1987) Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self-thinning. For Sci 33: 517–537Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven B. Jack
    • 1
  • James N. Long
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Resources and Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations