Trees

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 5–13

Impairment of gas exchange and structure in birch leaves (Betula pendula) caused by low ozone concentrations

  • Rainer Matyssek
  • Madeleine S. Günthardt-Goerg
  • Theodor Keller
  • Christoph Scheidegger
Original Articles
  • 104 Downloads

Summary

Injury caused by low O3 concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1 μl 1-1) was analyzed in the epidermis and mesophyll of fully developed birch leaves by gas exchange experiments and low-temperature SEM: (I) after leaf formation in O3-free and ozonated air, and (II) after transferring control plants into ozonated air. In control leaves, autumnal senescence also was studied in O3-free air (III). As O3 concentration increased, leaves of (I) stayed reduced in size, but showed increased specific weight and stomatal density. The declining photosynthetic capacity, quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency lowered the light saturation of CO2 uptake and the water-use efficiency (WUE). Carbon gain was less limited by the reduced stomatal conductance than by the declining ability of CO2 fixation in the mesophyll. The changes in gas exchange were related to the O3 dose and were mediated by narrowed stomatal pores (overriding the increase in stomatal density) and by progressive collapse of mesophyll cells. The air space in the mesophyll increased, preceded by exudate formation on cell walls. Ozonated leaves, which had developed in O3-free air (II), displayed a similar but more rapid decline than the leaves from (I). In senescent leaves (III), CO2 uptake showed a similar decrease as in leaves with O3 injury but no changes in mesophyll structure and WUE. The nitrogen concentration declined only in senescent leaves in parallel with the rate of CO2 uptake. A thorough understanding of O3 injury and natural senescence requires combined structural and functional analyses of leaves.

Key words

Ozone Betula pendula Leaf gas exchange Leaf structure Senescence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams III WW, Winter K, Schreiber U, Schramel P (1990) Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in relationship to changes in pigment and element composition of leaves of Platanus occidentalis L. during autumnal senescence. Plant Physiol 93: 1164–1190Google Scholar
  2. Beckett A, Read ND (1986) Low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. In: Aldrich HC, Todd WJ (eds) Ultrastructure techniques for microorganisms. Plenum, New York, pp 45–86Google Scholar
  3. Boyer JS (1970) Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol 46: 233–235Google Scholar
  4. Brown KA, Roberts TM (1988) Effects of ozone on foliar leaching in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]: confounding factors due to NOx production during ozone generation. Environ Pollut 55: 55–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Farquzhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33: 317–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Field CB (1987) Leaf-age effects on stomatal conductance. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR (eds) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 367–384Google Scholar
  7. Greitner CS, Winner WE (1989) Effects of O3 on alder photosynthesis and symbiosis with Frankia. New Phytol 111: 647–656Google Scholar
  8. Hanson PJ, McLaughlin SB, Edwards NT (1988) Net CO2 exchange of pinus taeda shoots exposed to variable ozone levels and rain chemistries in field and laboratory settings. Physiol Plant 74: 635–642Google Scholar
  9. Keller T (1976) Auswirkungen niedriger SO2-Konzentrationen auf junge Fichten. Schweiz Z Forstw 127: 237–251Google Scholar
  10. Koch W, Lautenschlager K (1988) Photosynthesis and transpiration in the upper crown of a mature spruce in purified and ambient atmosphere in a natural stand. Trees 3: 213–222Google Scholar
  11. Koike T (1988) Leaf structure and photosynthetic performance as related to the forest succession of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Species Biol 3: 77–87Google Scholar
  12. Körner CH, Scheel JA, Bauer H (1979) Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13: 45–82Google Scholar
  13. Krupa SV, Kickert RN (1989) The greenhouse effect: impacts of ultraviolet-B (UV-B), radiation, carbon dioxide (CO2), and ozone (O3) on vegetation. Environ Pollut 61: 263–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuno H (1980) Effects of photochemical oxidants on the growth of poplar cuttings. II Effects of photochemical oxidant on chlorophyll contents, photosynthetic and dark respiratory rates, soluble carbohydrate and nitrogen contents in leaves of different ages. Taiki Osen Gakkaishi 15: 155–162Google Scholar
  15. Lange OL, Beyschlag W, Tenhunen JD (1987) Control of leaf carbon assimilation — input of chemical energy into ecosystems. In: Schulze E-D, Zwölfer H (eds) (Ecological studies vol 61) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  16. Lange OL, Heber U, Schulze E-D, Ziegler H (1989) 3-D Atmospheric pollutants and plant metabolism. In: Schulze E-D, Lange OL, Oren R (eds) Forest decline and air pollution. (Ecological studies, vol 77) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 238–273Google Scholar
  17. Lehnherr B, Grandjean A, Mächler F, Fuhrer J (1987) The effect of ozone in ambient air on ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity decreases photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat. J Plant Physiol 130: 189–200Google Scholar
  18. Matyssek R (1986) Carbon, water and nitrogen relations in evergreen and deciduous conifers. Tree Physiol 2: 177–187Google Scholar
  19. Medina E (1984) Nutrient balance and physiological processes at the leaf level. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, Vazquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp 139–154Google Scholar
  20. Mohren GMC (1988) Report on group discussions and final recommendations. In: Bervaes J, Mathy P, Evers P (eds) Relationships between above and below ground influences of air pollutants on forest trees. COST-612 Air Pollut Res Rep 16: 263–270Google Scholar
  21. Mooney HA, Winner WE (1988) Carbon gain, allocation, and growth as affected by atmospheric pollutants. In: Schulte-Hostede S, Darral NM, Blank LW, Wellburn AR (eds) Air pollution and plant metabolism. Elsevier, London, pp 272–287Google Scholar
  22. Müller T, Guggenheim R, Düggelin M, Scheidegger C (1991) Freezefracturing for conventional and field emission low-temperature scanning electron microscopy: the scanning cryo unit SCU 020. J Microsc (Oxford) 161 (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Read ND (1990) Low-temperature scanning electron microscopy of fungi and fungus-plant interactions. In: Mendgen K, Lesemann DE (eds) Electron microscopy applied in plant pathology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Reich PB, Amundson RG (1985) Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230: 566–570Google Scholar
  25. Reich PB (1983) Effects of low concentrations of O3 on net photosynthesis, dark respiration, and chlorophyll contents in aging hybrid poplar leaves. Plant Physiol 73: 291–296Google Scholar
  26. Reich PB (1987) Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiol 3: 63–91Google Scholar
  27. Sasek TW, Richardson CJ (1989) Effects of chronic doses of ozone on loblolly pine: photosynthetic characteristics in the third growing season. For Sci 35: 745–755Google Scholar
  28. Scheidegger C, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Matyssek R, Hatvani P (1991) Low temperature SEM of birch leaves after exposure to ozone. J Microsc (Oxford) 161 (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Schulze E-D (1989) Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest. Science 244: 776–783Google Scholar
  30. Schulze E-D, Hall AE (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss, and nutrient relations in contrasting environments. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant ecology (vol 12 B) physiological plant ecology II. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 182–230Google Scholar
  31. Terashima I, Wong S-C, Osmond CB, Farquhar GD (1988) Characterisation of non-uniform photosynthesis induced by abscisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant Cell Physiol 29: 385–394Google Scholar
  32. Thomas HT, Stoddart JT (1980) Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31: 83–111Google Scholar
  33. Urbach W, Schmidt W, Kolbowski J, Rümmele S, Reisberg E, Steigner W, Schreiber U (1989) Wirkungen von Umweltschadstoffen auf Photosynthese und Zellmembranen von Pflanzen. In: Reuther M, Kirchner M (eds) 1. Statusseminar der PBWU zum Forschungs-schwerpunkt Waldschäden. GSF München, pp 195–206Google Scholar
  34. Winner WE, Gillespie C, Shen W-S, Mooney HA (1988) Stomatal responses to SO2 and O3. In: Schulte-Hostede S, Darral NM, Blank LW, Wellburn AR (eds) Air pollution and plant metabolism. Elsevier, London, pp 255–271Google Scholar
  35. Wright EA (1988) Some effects of low levels of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on the control of water loss by Betula spp. In: Mathy P (ed) Air pollution and ecosystems. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 760–765Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Matyssek
    • 1
  • Madeleine S. Günthardt-Goerg
    • 1
  • Theodor Keller
    • 1
  • Christoph Scheidegger
    • 1
  1. 1.Swiss Federal Institute of Forest, Snow and Landscape ResearchBirmensdorf ZHSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations