Climatic Change

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 279–288 | Cite as

Development of a MIOMBO woodland dynamics model in Zambezian Africa Using Malawi as a case study

  • Paul V. Desanker


A patch model was developed to characterize the effects of climate on succession of miombo dry forests of Zambezian Africa using Malawi as a case study. The model, called MIOMBO, is based on the FORSKA Version 1 gap model of forest succession by Prentice and Leemans (1990). The FORSKA model was modified to include the effects of moisture and fire; and how these affect processes of establishment, survival, growth and development. The impacts that four different GCM scenarios for a CO2 doubling might have on dynamics of a number of miombo species were analyzed. Preliminary results show a gradual increase in the basal area of the more mesic species. This result is consistent with what might be expected with increased precipitation. Tree growth and development data with associated detailed climatic data are lacking and severely limit the ability to define quantitatively how species are influenced by given levels of environmental factors (such as climate and nutrient factors), and how they might respond to seasonal changes in climate variability.


Precipitation Environmental Factor Seasonal Change Basal Area Gradual Increase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972, ‘Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth’, J. Ecology 60, 849–872.Google Scholar
  2. Botkin, D. B.: 1993, Forest Dynamics, An Ecological Model, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chidumayo, E. N.: 1987, ‘Species Structure in Zambian Miombo Woodland’, J. Trop. Ecol. 3, 109–118.Google Scholar
  4. Chidumayo, E. N.: 1991, ‘Seedling Development of the Miombo Woodland Tree Julbernardia globiflora’, J. Vegetation Sci. 2, 21–26.Google Scholar
  5. Desanker, P. V. and Prentice, I. C.: 1994, ‘MIOMBO — A Vegetation Dynamics Model for the Miombo Woodlands of Zambezian Africa’, Forest Ecol. Management 69, 87–95.Google Scholar
  6. Develice, R. L.: 1988, ‘Test of Forest Dynamics Simulator in New Zealand’, New Zealand J. Botany 26, 387–392.Google Scholar
  7. Doyle, T. W.: 1981, ‘The Role of Disturbance in the Gap Dynamics of a Montane Rain Forest: An Applic ation of a Tropical Forest Succession Model’, in West, D. C., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin D. B. (eds.), Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
  8. Ernst, W. H. O.: 1988, ‘Seed and Seedling Ecology of Brachystegia spiciformis, a Predominant Tree Component in Miombo Woodlands in South Central Africa’, Forest Ecol. Management 25, 195–210.Google Scholar
  9. Ernst, W. H. O. and Walker, B. H.: 1973, ‘Studies on the Hydrature of Trees in Miombo Woodland in South Central Africa’, J. Ecol. 61, 667–673.Google Scholar
  10. Fanshawe, D. B.: 1971, The Vegetation of Zambia, Government Printer, Lusaka, 67 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Friend, A. D., Shugart, H. H., and Running, S. W.: 1993, ‘A Physiologically Based Gap Model of Forest Dynamics’, Ecology 74, 792–797.Google Scholar
  12. Frost, P. G. H.and Robertson, F.: 1987, ‘The Ecological Effects of Fire in Savannas’, in Walker B. H. (ed.), Determinants of Tropical Savannas, IUBS Monograph Series 3, IRL Press, Eynsham, Oxford, pp. 93–140.Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths, J. F. (ed.): 1972, ‘Climates of Africa’, in Landsberg, H. E. (ed.), World Survey of Climatology, Vol. 10, Elsevier, New York, 604 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Groome, J. S., Lees, H. M. N., and Wigg, L. T.: 1957, ‘A Summary of Information on Pterocarpus angolensis, Parts I and II’, Forestry Abstr. 18, 3–8, 153–162.Google Scholar
  15. Hardcastle, P. D.: 1977, ‘A Preliminary Silvicultural Classification of Malawi’, Forest Research Record, No. 57, Forest Research Institute of Malawi, P.O. Box 270, Zomba, Malawi.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, B.: 1965, ‘Observations on Savanna Burning in the Oklokemeji Forest Reserve, Nigeria’, J. Appl. Ecol. 2, 367–381.Google Scholar
  17. Lauenroth, W. K.: 1996, ‘Application of Patch Models to Examine Regional Sensitivity to Climate Change’, Clim. Change 34, 155–160 (this issue).Google Scholar
  18. Lawton, R. M.: 1972, An Ecological Study of Miombo and Chipya Woodland with Particular Reference to Zambia, Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. Lawton, R. M.: 1978, ‘A Study of the Dynamic Ecology of Zambian Vegetation’, J.Ecol. 66, 175–198.Google Scholar
  20. Malaisse, F.: 1978, ‘The Miombo Ecosystem’, in Tropical Forest Ecosystems, A State-of-Knowledge Report, Natural Resources Research XIV, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 589–606.Google Scholar
  21. McGregor, J.: 1994, ‘Woodland Pattern and Structure in a Peasant Farming Area of Zimbabwe: Ecological Determinants and Present and Past Use’, Forest Ecol. Management 63, 97–133.Google Scholar
  22. Menaut, J. C., Gignoux, J., Prado, C., and Clobert, J.: 1990, ‘Tree Community Dynamics in a Humid Savanna of the Cote-d'Ivoire: Modelling the Effects of Fire and Competition with Grass and Neighbors’, J. Biogeogr. 17, 471–481.Google Scholar
  23. Prentice, I. C. and Leemans, R.: 1991, ‘Pattern and Process and the Dynamics of Forest Structure: A Simulation Approach’, J. Ecol. 78, 340–355.Google Scholar
  24. Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R. A., and Solomon, A. M.: 1992, ‘A Global Biome Model Based on Plant Physiology and Dominance, Soil Properties and Climate’, J. Biogeog. 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  25. Shugart, H. H.: 1984, A Theory of Forest Dynamics, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1977, ‘Development of an Appalachian Deciduous Forest Successional Model and its Application to Assessment of the Impact of the Chestnut Blight’, J. Environ. Manage. 5, 161–179.Google Scholar
  27. Shugart, H. H. and Noble, I. R.: 1981, ‘A Computer Model of Succession and Fire Response to the High Altitude Eucalyptus Forest of the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory’, Austral. J. Ecol. 6, 149–164.Google Scholar
  28. Shugart, H. H., Hopkins, M. S., Burgess, I. P., and Mortlock, A. T.: 1980, ‘The Development of a Successional Model for Subtropical Ram Forest and its Application to Assess the Effects of Timber Harvest at Wiangaree State Forest, New South Wales’, J. Environ. Manage. 11, 243–265.Google Scholar
  29. Shugart, H. H., Smith, T. M., and Post, W. M.: 1992, ‘The Potential for Application of Individual-Based Simulation Models for Assessing the Effects of Global Change’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 15–38.Google Scholar
  30. Schmitz, A.: 1950, ‘Principaux Types de Végétation Forestière dans le Haut-Katanga’, C. R. Trav. Congr. Sci. Elizabethville, 30 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Trapnell, C. G.: 1959, ‘Ecological Results of Woodland Burning Experiments in Northern Rhodesia’, J. Ecol. 47, 129–168.Google Scholar
  32. van Daalen, J. C. and Shugart, H. H.: 1989, ‘OUTENIQUA - A Computer Model to Simulate Succession in the Mixed Evergreen Forests of the Southern Cape, South Africa’, Landscape Ecol 24, 255–267.Google Scholar
  33. Vermeulen, W. J.: 1990, A Monograph on Pterocarpus angolensis, SARCCUS Standing Committee for Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  34. Werger, M. J. A. and Coetzee, B. J.: 1978, ‘The Sudano-Zambezian Region’, in Werger, M. J. A. (ed.), Biogeography and Ecology of Southern Africa, Junk, The Hague, 1439 pp. (Monogr. Biol. 31), pp. 301–462.Google Scholar
  35. White, F.: 1968, ‘Zambia’, Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 54, 208–215.Google Scholar
  36. White, F.: 1983, The Vegetation of Africa, Unesco, Paris, 356 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Wild, H. and Barbosa, L. A. G.: 1967, Vegetation Map (1:250,000 in color) of the Flora Zambesiaca Area, Descriptive Memoir, Collins, Salisbury, Rhodesia (Suppl. to Flora Zambesiaca), 71 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul V. Desanker
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Wood Products, Michigan Technological UniversityHoughtonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations