Climatic Change

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 131–153 | Cite as

A review of forest patch models and their application to global change research

  • H. H. Shugart
  • T. M. Smith
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, J. D. and Melillo, J. M.: 1982, FORTNITE: A Computer Model of Organic matter and Nitrogen Dynamics in Forest Ecosystems, University of Wisconsin, Research Bulletin No. R3130.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz, F. A.: 1990, ‘The Response of Natural Ecosystems to the Rising Global CO2 Levels’, Annu. Rev. Ecology and Systematics 21, 167–196.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzaz, F. A. and Pickett, S. T. A.: 1980, ‘Physiological Ecology of Tropical Succession: A Comparative Review’, Annu. Rev. Ecology and Systematics 11, 287–310.Google Scholar
  4. Bonan, G. B.: 1989, ‘A Computer Model of the Solar Radiation, Soil Moisture, and Soil Thermal Regimes in Boreal Forests’, Ecolog. Modelling 45, 275–306.Google Scholar
  5. Bonan, G. B. and Hayden, B. P.: 1990, ‘Using a Forest Stand Simulation Model to Examine the Ecological and Climatic Significance of the Late-Quaternary Pine/Spruce Pollen Zone in Eastern Virginia’, Quat. Res. 33, 204–218.Google Scholar
  6. Botkin, D. B.: 1993, Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Botkin, D. B., Janak, J. F., and Wallis, J. R.: 1972, ‘Some Ecological Consequences of a Computer Model of Forest Growth’, J. Ecol. 60, 849–872.Google Scholar
  8. Bugman, H., Xiaodong, Y., Sykes, M., Martin, P., Linder, M., Desanker, P., and Cumming, S.: 1996, ‘A Comparison of Forest Gap Models: Model Structure and Behaviour’, Clim. Change 34, 289–313 (this issue).Google Scholar
  9. Bugman, H. and Fischlin, A.: 1996, ‘Simulating Forest Dynamics in Complex Topography Using Gridded Climate Data’, Clim. Change 34, 201–211 (this issue).Google Scholar
  10. Bugmann, H. K. M.: 1994, On the Ecology of Mountainous Forests in a Changing Climate: A Simulation Study, Ph.D. Thesis, No. 10638, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  11. Busing, R. T.: 1991, ‘A Spatial Model of Forest Dynamics’, Vegetatio 92, 167–179.Google Scholar
  12. Busing, R. T. and Clebsch, E. E. C.: 1987, ‘Application of a Spruce-Fir Forest Canopy Gap Model’, Forest Ecol. Management 20, 151–169.Google Scholar
  13. Coffin, D. P. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1989, ‘Disturbances and Gap Dynamics in a Semiarid Grassland: A Landscape-Level Approach’, Landscape Ecol. 3, 19–27.Google Scholar
  14. Coffin, D. P. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1990, ‘A Gap Dynamics Simulation Model of Succession in a Semiarid Grassland’, Ecol. Modelling 49, 229–266.Google Scholar
  15. Coffin, D. P. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1994, ‘Successional Dynamics of a Semiarid Grassland: Effects of Soil Texture and Disturbance Size’, Vegetatio 110, 67–82.Google Scholar
  16. Coffin, D. P. and Lauenroth, W. K.: 1996, ‘Transient Responses of North American Grasslands to Changes in Climate’, Clim. Change 34, 269–278 (this issue).Google Scholar
  17. Cummings, S. and Burton, P.: 1996, ‘Phenology-Mediated Effects of Climate Change on Some Simulated British Columbia Forests’, Clim. Change 34, 213–222 (this issue).Google Scholar
  18. Dale, V. H. and Hemstrom, M. A.: 1984, CLIMACS: A Computer Model of Forest Stand Development for Western Oregon and Washington, USDA/Forest Service Research Paper, PNW-327.Google Scholar
  19. Denslow, J. S.: 1980, ‘Gap Partitioning Among Tropical Rainforest Trees’, Biotropica 12, 47–55 (Suppl).Google Scholar
  20. Desanker, P. V. and Prentice, I. C.: 1993, ‘Miombo- A Vegetation Dynamics Model for the Miombo Woodlands of Zambezian Africa’, Forest Ecol. Management 69, 87–95.Google Scholar
  21. Desanker, P. V.: 1996, ‘Development of a Miombo Woodland Model in Zambezian Africa Using Malawi as a Case Study’, Clim. Change 34, 279–288 (this issue).Google Scholar
  22. Develice, R. L.: 1988, ‘Test of a Forest Dynamics Simulator in New Zealand’, N. Z. J. Botany 26, 387–392.Google Scholar
  23. Doyle, T. W: 1981, ‘The Role of Disturbance in the Gap Dynamics of a Montaine Rain Forest: An Application of a Tropical Forest Succession Model’, in West, D. C., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin, D. B. (eds.), Forest Succession: Concepts and Application, Springer, New York, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
  24. El Bayoumi, M. A., Shugart, H. H., and Wein, R. W.: 1984, ‘Modeling Succession of the Eastern Canadian Mixed-Wood Forest’, Ecolog. Modelling 21, 175–198.Google Scholar
  25. Franklin, J. F., Shugart, H. H., and Harmon, M. E.: 1987, ‘Tree Death as an Ecosystem Process’, Bio-Science 37, 550–556.Google Scholar
  26. Friend, A. D.: 1991, ‘Use of a Model of Photosynthesis and Leaf Microenvironment to Predict Optimal Stomatal Conductance and Leaf Nitrogen Partitioning’, Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 895–905.Google Scholar
  27. Friend, A. D., Shugart, H. H., and Running, S. W: 1993, ‘A Physiology-Based Model of Forest Dynamics’, Ecology 74, 792–797.Google Scholar
  28. Grubb, P. J.: 1977, ‘The Maintenance of Species-Richness in Plant Communities: The Importance of the Regeneration Niche’, Biol. Rev. 52, 107–145.Google Scholar
  29. Harrison, E. A. and Shugart, H. H.: 1990, ‘Evaluating Performance on an Appalachian Oak Forest Dynamics Model’, Vegetatio 86, 1–13.Google Scholar
  30. Ker, J. W. and Smith, J. H. G.: 1955, ‘Advantages of the Parabolic Expression of Height-Diameter Relationships’, Forestry Chronicles 31, 235–246.Google Scholar
  31. Kercher, J. R. and Axelrod, M. C.: 1984, ‘A Process Model of Fire Ecology and Succession in a Mixed-Conifer Forest’, Ecology 65, 1725–1742.Google Scholar
  32. Kienast, F. and Kuhn, N.: 1989, ‘Simulating Forest Succession Along Ecological Gradients in Southern Central Europe’, Vegetatio 79, 7–20.Google Scholar
  33. Kozlowski, T. T.: 1971, Growth and Development of Trees: Vol. I. Seed Germination, Ontogeny and Shoot Growth, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Kozlowski, T. T.: 1971, Growth and Development of Trees: Vol. II. Cambial Growth, Root Growth and Reproductive Growth, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Kramer, K. and Mohren, G. M. J.: 1996, ‘Sensitivity of FORGRO to Climatic Change Scenarios: A Case Study on Betula Pubescens, Fagus Sylvatica and Quercus Robur in the Netherlands’, Clim. Change 34, 231–237 (this issue).Google Scholar
  36. Lauenroth, W. K., Urban, D. L., Coffin, D. P., Parton, W. J., Shugart, H. H., Kirchner, T. B., and Smith, T. M.: 1993, ‘Modelling Vegetation Structure-Ecosystem Process Interactions Across Sites and Biomes’, Ecolog. Modelling 67, 49–80.Google Scholar
  37. Leemans, R. and Prentice, I. C.: 1987, ‘Description and Simulation of Tree-Layer Composition and Size Distributions in a Primaeval Picea-Pinus Forest’, Vegetatio 69, 147–156.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, P.: 1992, ‘EXE: A Climatically Sensitive Model to Study Climate Change and CO2 Enrichment Effects on Forests’, Austral. J. Botany 40, 717–735.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, P.: 1996, ‘Climate Change, Water Stress, and Fast Forest response: A Sensitivity Study’, Clim. Change 34, 223–230 (this issue).Google Scholar
  40. Menaut, J. C., Gignoux, J., Prado, C., and Clobert, J.: 1990, ‘Tree Community Dynamics in a Humid Savanna of the Côte-d'Ivoire: Modelling the Effects of Fire and Competition with Grass and Neighbors’, J. Biogeography 17, 471–481.Google Scholar
  41. Mielke, D. L., Shugart, H. H., and West, D. C.: 1978, A Stand Model for Upland Forests of Southern Arkansas, ORNL/TM-6225, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  42. Newnham, R. M.: 1964, The Development of a Stand Model for Douglas-Fir, Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  43. O'Brien, S. T., Hayden, B. P., and Shugart, H. H.: 1992, ‘Global Change, Hurricanes, and a Tropical Forest’, Clim. Change 22, 175–190.Google Scholar
  44. Oja, T.: 1983, ‘Metsa Suktsessiooni Ja Tasandilise Straktuuri Imiteerimisest’, Yearbook of the Estonian Naturalist Soc. 69, 110–117.Google Scholar
  45. Pacala, S. W., Canham, C. D., and Silander Jr., J. A.: 1993, ‘Forest Models Defined by Field Measurements: I. The Design of a Northeastern Forest Simulator’, Can. J. Forest Res. 23, 1980–1988.Google Scholar
  46. Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., and Cole, C. V: 1988, ‘Dynamics of C, N, P and S in Grassland Soils: A Model’, Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131.Google Scholar
  47. Pastor, J. and Post, W. M.: 1986, ‘Influences of Climate, Soil Moisture, and Succession on Forest Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles’, Biogeochemistry 2, 3–27.Google Scholar
  48. Pearlstine, L., McKellar, H., and Kitchens, W.: 1985, ‘Modeling the Impacts of River Diversion on Bottomland Forest Communities in the Santee River Floodplain, South Carolina’, Ecolog. Modelling 29, 283–302.Google Scholar
  49. Phipps, R. L.: 1979, ‘Simulation of Wetlands Forest Dynamics’, Ecolog. Modelling 7, 257–288.Google Scholar
  50. Post, W. M. and Pastor, J.: 1996, ‘LINKAGES: An Individual-Based Forest Ecosystem Model’, Clim. Change 34, 253–261 (this issue).Google Scholar
  51. Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: 1972, ‘On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters’, Monthly Weather Rev. 100, 81–92.Google Scholar
  52. Reed, K. L.: 1980, ‘An Ecological Approach to Modeling Growth of Forest Trees’, Forest Sci. 26, 33–50.Google Scholar
  53. Root, T. L. and Schneider, S. H.: 1995, ‘Ecology and Climate: Research Strategies and Implications’, Science 269, 334–340.Google Scholar
  54. Shao, G.: 1991, ‘Moisture-Therm Indices and Optimum-Growth Modeling for the Main Species in Korean Pine/Deciduous Mixed Forests’, Sci. Silvae Sinicae 21, 21–27.Google Scholar
  55. Shao, G., Zhao, S., and Zhao, G.: 1991, ‘Application of GIS in Simulation of Forested Landscape Communities: A Case Study in Changbaishan Biosphere Reserve’, Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 2, 103–107.Google Scholar
  56. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1977, ‘Development of an Appalachian Deciduous Forest Succession Model and Its Application to Assessment of the Impact of the Chestnut Blight’, J. Environ. Management 5, 161–179.Google Scholar
  57. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1979, ‘Size and Pattern in Simulated Forest Stands’, Forest Sci. 25, 120–122.Google Scholar
  58. Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1980, ‘Forest Succession Models’, BioScience 30, 308–313.Google Scholar
  59. Shugart, H. H. and Noble, I. R.: 1981, ‘A Computer Model of Succession and Fire Response to the High Altitude Eucalyptus Forest of the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory’, Austral. J. Ecology 6, 149–164.Google Scholar
  60. Shugart, H. H.: 1984, A Theory of Forest Dynamics: The Ecological Implications of Forest Succession Models, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Shugart, H. H., Hopkins, M. S., Burgess, I. P., and Mortlock, A. T.: 1980a, ‘The Development of a Succession Model for Subtropical Rain Forest and Its Application to Assess the Effects of Timber Harvest at Wiangaree State Forest, New South Wales’, J. Environ. Management 11, 243–265.Google Scholar
  62. Shugart, H.H., Leemans, R., and Bonan, G. B. (eds.): 1992a, A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  63. Shugart, H. H., Smith, T. M., and Post, W. M.: 1992b, ‘The Application of Individual-Based Simulation Models for Assessing the Effects of Global Change’, Annu. Rev. Ecology and Systematics 23, 15–38.Google Scholar
  64. Sirois, L., Bonan, G. B., and Shugart, H. H.: 1994, ‘Development of a Simulation Model of the Forest-Tundra Transition Zone of Northeastern Canada’, Can. J. Forest Res. 24, 697–706.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H., and Woodward, F. I. (eds.): 1996, Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, T. M. and Urban, D. L.: 1988, ‘Scale and the Resolution of Forest Structural Pattern’, Vegetatio 74, 143–150.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H., and Urban, D. L.: 1989, ‘Modeling Vegetation Across Biomes: Grassland-Forest Transition’, in Sjogren, E. (ed.), Forests of the World: Diversity and Dynamics, Svenska Vaxgeografiska Sallskapet, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 240–241.Google Scholar
  68. Solomon, A. M.: 1986, ‘Transient Response of Forests to CO2-Induced Climate Change: Simulation Experiments in Eastern North America’, Oecologia 68, 567–579.Google Scholar
  69. Solomon, A. M. and Shugart, H. H.: 1984, ‘Integrating Forest-Stand Simulations with Paleoecological Records to Examine Long-Term Forest Dynamics’, in Ågren, G. I. (ed.), State and Change of Forest Ecosystems: Indicators in Current Research, Report No. 13, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 333–357.Google Scholar
  70. Solomon, A. M. and Webb III, T.: 1985, ‘Computer-Aided Reconstruction of Late Quaternary Land-Scape Dynamics’, Annu. Rev. Ecology and Systematics 16, 63–84.Google Scholar
  71. Solomon, A. M., West, D. C., and Solomon, J. A.: 1981, ‘Simulating the Role of Climate Change and Species Immigration in Forest Succession’, in West, D. C., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin, D. B. (eds.), Forest Succession: Concepts and Application, Springer, New York, pp. 154–177.Google Scholar
  72. Tharp, M. L.: 1978, Modeling Major Perturbations on a Forest Ecosystem, M.S. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  73. Thornthwaite, C. W: 1931, ‘The Climates of North America According to a New Classification’, Geograph. Rev. 21, 633–655.Google Scholar
  74. van Daalen, J. C. and Shugart, H. H.: 1989, ‘OUTENIQUA A Computer Model to Simulate Succession in the Mixed Evergreen Forests of the Southern Cape, South Africa’, Landscape Ecol. 24, 255–267.Google Scholar
  75. van der Pijl, L.: 1972, Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  76. van Tongeren, O. and Prentice, I. C.: 1986, ‘A Spatial Simulation Model for Vegetation Dynamics’, Vegetatio 65, 163–173.Google Scholar
  77. Waldrop, T. A., Buckner, E. R., Shugart, H. H., and McGee, C. E.: 1986, ‘FORCAT: A Single Tree Model of Stand Development on the Cumberland Plateau’, Forest Sci. 32, 297–317.Google Scholar
  78. Weinstein, D. A., Shugart, H. H. and West, D. C.: 1982, The Long-Term Nutrient Retention Properties of Forest Ecosystems: A Simulation Investigation, ORNL/TM-8472, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  79. Weishampel, J. F, Urban, D. L., Shugart, H. H., and Smith, J. B.: 1992, ‘A Comparison of Semivariograms From a Forest Transect Gap Model and Remotely Sensed Data’, J. Vegetation Sci. 3, 521–526.Google Scholar
  80. Whitmore, T. C.: 1975, Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East, Clarendon, Oxford, 282 pp.Google Scholar
  81. Whittaker, R. H. and Marks, P. L.: 1975, ‘Methods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivity’, in Leith, H. and Whittaker, R. H. (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer, Berlin, pp. 55–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Shugart
    • 1
  • T. M. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations