Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 801–805 | Cite as

The use of constrained selection indexes in breeding for economic merit

  • J. P. Gibson
  • B. W. Kennedy
Originals

Summary

Various methods exist for the derivation of restricted and/or desired gains selection indexes, and their use in applied breeding has been advocated. It is shown that there exists a set of implied linear economic weights for all constrained indexes and their derivation is given. Where economic weights are linear and known, a standard selection index is, by definition, optimal and thus a constrained index will usually be suboptimal. It is argued that economic weights can always be estimated and that the effects of uncertain weights can be examined by sensitivity analysis. If economic weights are nonlinear, use of the first order (linear) economic weights or a derived linear index, using previously described methods, will give very close to optimum economic selection responses. Examples from the literature indicate that severe losses of potential economic gain can possibly occur through use of a constrained index. It is concluded that constrained indexes should be avoided for economic genetic selection.

Key words

Economic weights Restricted indexes Desired gains 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brascamp EW (1984) Selection indices with constraints. Anim Breed Abstr 52:645 -654Google Scholar
  2. Cunningham EP, Moen RA, Gjedrem T (1970) Restriction of selection indexes. Biometrics 26:67–74Google Scholar
  3. Eisen EJ (1977) Restricted selection index: an approach to selecting for feed efficiency. J Anim Sci 44:958–972Google Scholar
  4. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7:179–189Google Scholar
  5. Goddard ME (1983) Selection indices for nonlinear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 64:339–344Google Scholar
  6. Harville DA (1975) Index selection with proportionality constraints. Biometrics 31:223–225Google Scholar
  7. Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28:476–490Google Scholar
  8. Itoh Y, Yamada Y (1987) Comparisons of selection indexes achieving predetermined proportional gains. Genet Sel Evol 19:69–82Google Scholar
  9. Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15:10–19Google Scholar
  10. Pesek J, Baker, RJ (1969) Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can J Plant Sci 49:803–804Google Scholar
  11. Smith HF (1936) A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugenics 7:240–250Google Scholar
  12. de Vries AG (1989) A method to incorporate competitive position in the breeding goal. Anim Prod 48:221–227Google Scholar
  13. Wilton JW, Evans DA, Van Vleck LD (1968) Selection indices for quadratic models of total merit. Biometrics 24:937–949Google Scholar
  14. Yamada Y, Yokouchi K, Nishida A (1975) Selection index when genetic gains of individual traits are of primary concern. Jpn J Genet 50:33–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Gibson
    • 1
  • B. W. Kennedy
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Animal and Poultry Science, University of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations