Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 84, Issue 5–6, pp 600–607 | Cite as

Inheritance of two independent isozyme variants in soybean plants derived from tissue culture

  • L. A. Amberger
  • R. C. Shoemaker
  • R. G. Palmer
Article

Summary

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants were regenerated via somatic embryogenesis from nine soybean cultivars. Our objective was to identify and characterize genetically novel mutations that would further our understanding of the soybean genome. Variant isozyme patterns were observed in two independent tissue culturederived lines. Genetic analyses were conducted on these two isozyme variants, and they were heritable. No variant isozyme patterns were evident in control (parental) soybean lines. In the cultivar BSR 101, a mutation of Aco2-b (aconitase) to a null allele was detected. The Aco2-bn mutant, Genetic Type T318, had not been previously observed in soybean. In the Chinese cultivar Jilin 3 (PI 427.099), a chlorophyll-deficient plant was identified that also lacked two mitochondrial malate-dehydrogenase (Mdh null) isozyme bands. These two mutant phenotypes, chlorophyll-deficient and Mdh null, were found to cosegregate. The Jilin 3 mutant, Mdh1-n (Ames 1) y20 (Ames 1) Genetic Type T317, was allelic to three chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutants [Mdh1-n (Ames 2) y20 (Ames 2) (T323), Mdh1-n (Ames 3) y20 (Ames 3) (T324), and Mdh1-n (Ames 4) y20 (Ames 4) (T325)] previously identified from a transposon-containing soybean population, and to a chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutant [Mdh1-n (Urbana) y20 (Urbana) k2, Genetic Type T253] which occurred spontaneously in soybean. The recovery of two isozyme variants from progeny of 185 soybean plants regenerated from somatic embryogenesis indicates the feasibility of selection for molecular variants.

Key words

Somaclonal variation Tissue culture Glycine max (L.) Merr. Isozymes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amberger LA, Palmer RG, Shoemaker RC (1992) Analyses of culture-induced variation in soybean. Crop Sci (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Barwale UB, Widholm JM (1987) Somaclonal variation in plants regenerated from cultures of soybean. Plant Cell 6:365–368.Google Scholar
  3. Brettell RIS, Dennis ES (1991) Reactivation of a silent Ac following tissue culture is associated with heritable alterations in its methylation pattern. Mol Gen Genet 229:365–372.Google Scholar
  4. Brettell RIS, Dennis ES, Scowcroft WR, Peacock WJ (1986 a) Molecular analysis of a somaclonal mutant of maize alcohol dehydrogenase. Mol Gen Genet 202:235–239.Google Scholar
  5. Brettell RIS, Pallotta MA, Gustafson JP, Appels R (1986b) Variation at the Nor loci in triticale derived from tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 71:637–643.Google Scholar
  6. Burr B, Burr F (1981) Transposable elements and genetic instabilities in crop plants. Stadler Genet Symp 13:115–128.Google Scholar
  7. Cardy BJ, Beversdorf WD (1984 a) A procedure for the starch gel electrophoretic detection of isozymes in soybean [Glycine max (L) Merr.]. Dep Crop Sci Tech Bull 119/8401. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Cardy BJ, Beversdorf WD (1984b) Identification of soybean cultivars using isoenzyme electrophoresis. Seed Sci Technol 12:943–954.Google Scholar
  9. Dennis ES, Brettell RIS, Peacock WJ (1987) A tissue cultureinduced Adh1 null mutant of maize results from a single base change. Mol Gen Genet 210:181–183.Google Scholar
  10. Evans DA, Sharp WR (1983) Single gene mutations in tomato regenerated from tissue culture. Science 221:949–951.Google Scholar
  11. Freytag AH, Rao-Arelli AP, Anand SC, Wrather JA, Owens LD (1989) Somaclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep 8:199–202.Google Scholar
  12. Graybosch RA, Edge ME, Delannay X (1987) Somaclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from the cotyledonary node tissue culture system. Crop Sci 27:803–806.Google Scholar
  13. Groose RW, Weigelt HD, Palmer RG (1988) Somatic analysis of an unstable mutation for anthocyanin pigmentation in soybean. J Hered 79:263–267.Google Scholar
  14. Groose RW, Schulte SM, Palmer RG (1990) Germinal reversion of an unstable mutation for anthocyanin pigmentation in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 79:161–167.Google Scholar
  15. Hedges BR (1989) The application of primary trisomies and transposon-induced mutations in genetic studies of soybean [Glycine max (L) Merr]. PhD Dissertation piss no 89–20137, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  16. Hymowitz T, Singh RJ (1987) Taxonomy and speciation. Agronomy 16:23–48.Google Scholar
  17. Klerk GH de (1990) How to measure somaclonal variation. Acta Bot Neerl 39:129–144.Google Scholar
  18. James MG, Stadler J (1989) Molecular characterization of Mutator systems in maize embryogenic callus culture indicates Mu element activity in vitro. Theor Appl Genet 77:383–393.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson SS, Phillips RL, Rines HW (1987) Possible role of heterochromatin in chromosome breakage induced by tissue culture in oats (Avena sativa L). Genome 29:439–446.Google Scholar
  20. Landsmann J, Urig H (1985) Somaclonal variation in Solanum tuberosum detected at the molecular level. Theor Appl Genet 71:500–505.Google Scholar
  21. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation — A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214.Google Scholar
  22. Larkin PJ, Ryan SA, Brettell RIS, Scowcroft WR (1984) Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 67:443–455.Google Scholar
  23. Lee M, Phillips RL (1988) The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 39:413–437.Google Scholar
  24. McCoy TJ, Phillips RL (1982) Chromosome stability in maize (Zea mays) tissue cultures and sectoring in some regenerated plants. Can J Genet Cytol 24:559–565.Google Scholar
  25. McCoy TJ, Phillips RL, Rines HW (1982) Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena sativa) tissue cultures: high frequency of partial chromosome loss. Can J Genet Cytol 24:37–50.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer RG (1984) Pleiotropy or close linkage of two mutants in soybeans. J Hered 75:445–447.Google Scholar
  27. Palmer RG, Hedges BR, Benavente RS, Groose RW (1989) w4-mutable line in soybean. Dev Genet 10:542–551.Google Scholar
  28. Peschke VM, Phillips RL, Gengenbach BG (1987) Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238:804–807.Google Scholar
  29. Peschke VM, Phillips RL (1991) Activation of the maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 81:90–97.Google Scholar
  30. Peschke VM, Phillips RL, Gengenbach BG (1991) Genetic and molecular analysis of tissue culture-derived Ac elements. Theor Appl Genet 82:121–129.Google Scholar
  31. Planckaert F, Walbot V (1989) Molecular and genetic characterization of Mu transposable elements in Zea mays: behavior in callus culture and regenerated plants. Genetics 123:567–578.Google Scholar
  32. Reisch B, Bingham ET (1981) Plants from ethionine-resistant alfalfa tissue cultures: variation in growth and morphological characters. Crop Sci 21:783–788.Google Scholar
  33. Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1988) The genomic relationship between Glycine max (L) Merr and G soja Sieb and Zucc as revealed by pachytene chromosome analysis. Theor Appl Genet 76:705–711.Google Scholar
  34. Skirvin RM, Janick J (1976) Tissue culture-induced variation in scented Pelargonium spp. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 101:281–290.Google Scholar
  35. Weber CR, Weiss MG (1959) Chlorophyll mutant in soybeans provides teaching aid. J Hered 50:53–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Amberger
    • 1
  • R. C. Shoemaker
    • 1
  • R. G. Palmer
    • 1
  1. 1.United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Field Crops Research Unit, and Departments of Agronomy and Zoology/GeneticsIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations