Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 84, Issue 1–2, pp 186–192 | Cite as

Towards an integrated linkage map of common bean

1. Development of genomic DNA probes and levels of restriction fragment length polymorphism
  • R. O. Nodari
  • E. M. K. Koinange
  • J. D. Kelly
  • P. Gepts
Article

Summary

Two genomic libraries were established to provide markers to develop an integrated map combining molecular markers and genes for qualitative and quantitative morpho-agronomic traits in common bean. Contrasting characteristics were observed for the two libraries. While 89% of the PstI clones were classified as single-copy sequences, only 21% of the EcoRIBamHI clones belonged in that category. Clones of these two libraries were hybridized against genomic DNA of nine genotypes chosen according to their divergent evolutionary origin and contrasting agronomic traits. Eight restriction enzymes were used in this study. PstI clones revealed 80–90% polymorphism between the Andean and Middle American gene pools and 50–60% polymorphism within these gene pools. However, under the same conditions only 30% of the EcoRI-BamHI clones showed polymorphism between the Middle American and Andean gene pools. Hybridization with PstI clones to EcoRI-, EcoRV-, or HindIII-digested genomic DNA resulted in a cumulative frequency of polymorphism of approximately 80%. Hybridizations to BamHI-, HaeIII-, HinfI-, PstI-, and XbaI-digested genomic DNA detected no additional polymorphisms not revealed by the former three enzymes. In the PstI library, a positive correlation was observed between the average size of hybridizing restriction fragments and the frequency of polymorphism detected by each restriction enzyme. This relationship is consistent with the higher proportion of insertion/deletion events compared with the frequency of nucleotide substitutions observed in that library.

Key words

Phaseolus vulgaris RFLP Genetic diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen JW, Story L, Sieling B, Chen W-JL, Petro MS, Story J (1984) Hypocholesterolemic effects of oat-bran or bean intake for hypercholesterolemic men. Am J Clin Nutr 40:1146–1155Google Scholar
  2. Antequera F, Bird AP (1988) Unmethylated CpG islands associated with genes in higher plant DNA. EMBO J 7:2295–2299Google Scholar
  3. Apuya NR, Frazier BL, Keim P, Roth EJ, Lark KG (1988) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms as genetic markers in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Theor Appl Genet 75:889–901Google Scholar
  4. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic improvement of agricultural species. Euphytica 35:111–124Google Scholar
  5. Bonierbale M, Plaisted RL, Tanksley SD (1988) RFLP maps based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120:1095–1103Google Scholar
  6. Burr B, Burr FA, Thompson KH, Albertsen MC, Stuber CW (1988) Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds of maize. Genetics 118:519Google Scholar
  7. Chang C, Bowman JL, DeJohn AW, Lander ES, Meyerowitz EM (1988) Restriction fragment length polymorphism linkage map for Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6856–6860Google Scholar
  8. Chase CD, Ortega VM, Vallejos CE (1991) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms correlate with isozyme diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet 81:806–811Google Scholar
  9. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1984) A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 137:266–267Google Scholar
  10. Figdore S, Kennard WC, Song KM, Slocum MK, Osborn TC (1988) Assessment of the degree of restriction fragment length polymorphism in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 75:833–840Google Scholar
  11. Gebhardt C, Ritter E, Debener T, Schachtschabel V, Wakemeier B, Uhrig H, Salamini F (1989) RFLP analysis and linkage mapping in Solatium tuberosum. Theor Appl Genet 78:65–75Google Scholar
  12. Gepts P (1990) Biochemical evidence bearing on the domestication of Phaseolus beans. Econ Bot 448:28–38Google Scholar
  13. Gepts P, Clegg MT (1989) Genetic diversity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R.Br.) at the DNA sequence level. J Hered 80:203–208Google Scholar
  14. Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991) Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. In: Voysest O, Van Schoonhoven A (eds) Common beans: research for crop improvement. CAB, Oxon, UK, pp 7–53Google Scholar
  15. Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolinprotein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40:451–468Google Scholar
  16. Gepts P, Llaca V, Nodari RO, Panella L (1992) Analysis of seed proteins, isozymes, and RFLPs for genetic and evolutionary studies in Phaseolus. In: Linskens HF, Jackson JF (eds) Modern methods of plant analysis. New series, Vol. 14. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Graner A, Siedler H, Jahoor A, Herrmann RG, Wenzel G (1990) Assessment of the degree and the type of restriction fragment polymorphism in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Theor Appl Genet 80:826–832Google Scholar
  18. Gruenbaum Y, Maveh-Many T, Cedar H, Razin A (1981) Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292:260–262Google Scholar
  19. Guo M, Lightfoot DA, Mok MC, Mok DWS (1991) Analyses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus Lam. hybrids by RFLP: preferential transmission of P. vulgaris alleles. Theor Appl Genet 81:703–709Google Scholar
  20. Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517Google Scholar
  21. Havey MJ, Muehlbauer FJ (1989) Linkages between restriction fragment length, isozyme, and morphological markers in lentil. Theor Appl Genet 77:395–401Google Scholar
  22. Helentjaris T, King G, Slocum M, Siedenstrang C, Wegmann S (1985) Restriction fragment polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol 5:109–118Google Scholar
  23. Heun M, Kennedy AE, Anderson JA, Lapitan NLV, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD (1991) Construction of a restriction fragment length polymorphism map for barley (Hordeum vulgare). Genome 34:437–447Google Scholar
  24. Holmes DS, Quigley M (1981) A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal Biochem 114:193–197Google Scholar
  25. Johannsen W (1909) Elementen der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Fisher, Jena, FRGGoogle Scholar
  26. Keim P, Shoemaker RC, Palmer RG (1989) Restriction fragment polymorphism diversity in soybean. Theor Appl Genet 77:786–792Google Scholar
  27. Kelly JD, Adams MW, Saettler AW, Hosfield GL, Varner GV, Uebersax MA, Taylor J (1990) Registration of ‘Sierra’ pinto bean. Crop Sci 30:745–746Google Scholar
  28. Khairallah MM, Adams MW, Sears BB (1990) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphins of Malawian bean lines: further evidence for two major gene pools. Theor Appl Genet 80:753–761Google Scholar
  29. Koenig R, Gepts P (1989) Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of diversity. Theor Appl Genet 78:809–817Google Scholar
  30. Landry BS, Kesseli RV, Farrara B, Michelmore RW (1987) A genetic map of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) with restriction fragment length polymorphism, isozyme, disease resistance and morphological markers. Genetics 116:331–337Google Scholar
  31. McCouch SR, Kochert G, Yu ZY, Khush GS, Coffman WR, Tanksley SD (1988) Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 76:815–829Google Scholar
  32. Mendel G (1865) Experiments on plant hybrids. In: Stern C, Sherwood ER (eds) The origin of genetics. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 1–48Google Scholar
  33. Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990a Effect of different restriction enzymes, probe source, and probe length on detecting restriction fragment length polymorphism in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 80:385–389Google Scholar
  34. Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990b) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80:437–448Google Scholar
  35. Monk M (1990) Variation in epigenetic inheritance. Trends Genet 6:110–114Google Scholar
  36. Nelson M, McClelland M (1987) The effect of site-specific methylation on restriction-modification enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 15:219–230Google Scholar
  37. Pachico D (1989) Trends in world common bean production. In: Schwartz HF, Pastor-Corrales MA (eds) Bean production problems in the tropics. CIAT, Cali, Colombia, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  38. Rigby PWJ, Dieckman M, Rhodes C, Berg O (1977) Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick-translation with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 113:237–251Google Scholar
  39. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.YGoogle Scholar
  40. Sax K (1923) The association of size differences with seed coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8:552–560Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz D (1989) Gene-controlled cytosine demethylation in the promoter region of the Ac transposable element in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:2789–2793Google Scholar
  42. Shii CT, Mok MC, Temple SR, Mok DWS (1980) Expression of developmental abnormalities in hybrids of Phaseolus vulgaris L. JHered 71:218–222Google Scholar
  43. Singh SP (1989) Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 43:39–57Google Scholar
  44. Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991a Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379–396Google Scholar
  45. Singh SP, Gutiérrez JA, Molina A, Urrea C, Gepts P (1991b) Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean: II. Markerbased analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Crop Sci 31:23–29Google Scholar
  46. Singh SP, Nodari R, Gepts P (1991c Genetic diversity in cultivated common bean. I. Allozymes. Crop Sci 31:19–23Google Scholar
  47. Sprecher SL (1988) Allozyme differentiation between gene pools in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), with special reference to Malawian germplasm. Ph.D thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MichGoogle Scholar
  48. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Tanksley SD (1983) Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:3–8Google Scholar
  50. Vanderborght T (1987) The study of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) variability by the use of multivariate statistical methods applied to a data base. Diss Abstr 47:3190B-1BGoogle Scholar
  51. Weis JH, Quertermous T (1987) Size fractionation using sucrose gradients. In: Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Strahl K (eds) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New York, pp 5.3.2–5.3.8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. O. Nodari
    • 1
  • E. M. K. Koinange
    • 1
  • J. D. Kelly
    • 1
  • P. Gepts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Range ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de FitotecnicaUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaFlorianpolis, SCBrazil
  3. 3.Ministry of AgricultureLyamungu Research InstituteMoshiTanzania
  4. 4.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations