Space Science Reviews

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 567–580

Thermal/suprathermal plasmas observed by the S-302 experiment on GEOS-1

  • J. F. E. Johnson
  • J. J. Sojka
  • G. L. Wrenn
Article

Abstract

The S-302 experiment has benefited more than most from the non-geostationary nature of the GEOS-1 orbit in so far as additional regions of quite different thermal and suprathermal plasmas were made accessible. Electron and positive ion spectra from three regions, the plasmasphere, plasmatrough and boundary layer, are described in order to highlight the variety of thermal plasmas observed.

We show how, even in the presence of the local photoelectron sheath and its associated electric potential, the thermal characteristics can be derived. The success of this technique during active periods is demonstrated by the observation of both a heating of the thermal population and the appearance of a second field aligned thermal component during a period of intense wave activity.

The detailed structure of the boundary layer adjacent to the magnetopause as observed on the 2nd December, 1977 shows only slow systematic development over a period of more than an hour. Where the thermal plasma density peaks the suprathermal positive ions show considerable drift motion as well as non-Maxwellian characteristics. This region is identified from the thermal particle data as being very close to the magnetopause, however, whether in fact the magnetopause was crossed requires corroborative data from the magnetometer and other experiments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Sayers, J.: 1970, J. Atmos. Terrest. Phys. 32, 663.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Deforest, S. E. and McIlwain, C. E.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3587.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chappell, C. R.: 1972, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10, 951.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gringauz, K. I.: 1976, in D. J. Williams (ed.), The Cold Plasma Throughout the Magnetosphere, in Physics of Solar Planetary Environments, p. 672, A.G.U.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Southwood, D. J.: 1978, Nature 271, 309.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Harris, K. K., Sharp, G. W., and Chappell, C. R.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5939.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Serbu, G. P. and Maier, E. J. R.: 1970, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6102.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    DeForest, S. E.: 1973, in R. J. L. Grard (ed.), Electrostatic Potentials Developed by ATS-5 in Photon and Particle Interactions with Surfaces in Space, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 263.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wrenn, G. L., Johnson, J. F. E., and Sojka, J. J.: Suprathermal Plasma Analysers aboard the ESA GEOS Satellites (in preparation).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Decreau, P., Etcheto, J., Knott, K., Pedersen, A., Wrenn, G. L., and Young, D. T.: 1978, Space Sci. Rev. 22, 633.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Christiansen, P., Gough, P., Martelli, G., Bloch, J. J., Cornilleau, N., Etcheto, J., Gendrin, R., Jones, D., Beghin, C., and Decreau, P.: 1978, Nature 272, 682.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Eastman, T. E. and Hones, E. W., Jr.: 1978, Characteristics of the Magnetospheric Boundary Layer and Magnetopause Layer in High Time Resolution. Paper presented to ISSTP, Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. E. Johnson
    • 1
  • J. J. Sojka
    • 1
  • G. L. Wrenn
    • 1
  1. 1.University College London, Mullard Space Science LaboratoryDorkingEngland

Personalised recommendations