Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 92, Issue 3–4, pp 357–362 | Cite as

Inheritance of resistance to the bean-pod weevil (Apion godmani Wagner) in common beans from Mexico

  • R. Garza
  • C. Cardona
  • S. P. Singh
Article

Abstract

The bean-pod weevil (BPW), Apion godmani Wagner, often causes heavy losses in crops of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Farmers need resistant bean cultivars to minimize losses, cut production costs, stabilize seed yield, and reduce pesticide use and consequent health hazards. To design effective breeding methods, breeders need new and better sources of resistance and increased knowledge of their modes of inheritance. We therefore: (1) compared sources of resistance to BPW, (2) studied the inheritance of resistance, and (3) determined whether the sources possess similar or different genes for BPW resistance. The following sources of resistance, originating from the Mexican highlands, were evaluated for 3 years at INIFAP-Santa Lucía de Prias, Texcoco, Mexico: ‘Amarillo 153’, ‘Amarillo 169’, ‘Hidalgo 58’, ‘J 117’, ‘Pinto Texcoco’, ‘Pinto 168’, and ‘Puebla 36’. All except ‘Puebla 36’ were crossed with the susceptible cultivar ‘Jamapa’. ‘Amarillo 153’ and ‘Puebla 36’ were crossed with another susceptible cultivar, ‘Bayo Mex’. The parents, F1 hybrids, and F2 populations were evaluated for BPW damage in 1992. Backcrosses of the F1 of Jamapa/Pinto 168 to the respective susceptible and resistant parents were also evaluated in 1992. All seven resistant accessions were crossed in all possible combinations, excluding reciprocals. The resulting 21 F1 hybrids and 21 F2 populations were evaluated for BPW damage in 1994. ‘J 117’ had the highest level of resistance to BPW. ‘Pinto Texcoco’ and ‘Puebla 36’ had the highest mean damage score of all seven sources of resistance. The F1 hybrids between susceptible parents and resistant sources were generally intermediate. Two genes segregating independently controlled the BPW resistance in each accession. One gene, Agm, has no effect when present alone, whereas the other gene, Agr, alone conferred intermediate resistance. When both genes were present, resistance to BPW was higher. Based on mean BPW damage scores, all 21 F1 hybrids and their F2 populations, derived from crosses among seven resistant accessions, were resistant. However, data from individual plant damage scores in F2 populations of Amarillo 169/Pinto 168 and Pinto Texcoco/Pinto 168 suggested that at least one gene in each of the three accessions was non-allelic. Data also indicated that ‘Amarillo 169’ had a dominant gene that conferred high levels of BPW resistance, irrespective of the alleles at the other locus; and that ‘Pinto Texcoco’ and ‘Pinto 168’ possessed two different genes for intermediate resistance.

Key words

Apion godmani Bean-pod weevil Breeding for resistance Common bean Inheritance Phaseolus vulgaris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acosta J, Rosales R, Garza R (1992) Resistance to the pod weevil in wild Phaseolus vulgaris. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop (CO) 35:103–104Google Scholar
  2. Beebe S, Cardona C, Díaz O, Rodríguez F, Mancía E, Ajquejay S (1993) Development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines resistant to the pod weevil, Apion godmani Wagner, in Central America. Euphytica 69:83–88Google Scholar
  3. Bliss FA (1980) Common bean. In: Fehr WR, Hadley HH (eds) Hybridization of crop plants. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 273–284Google Scholar
  4. Buishand TJ (1956) The crossing of bean (Phaseolus spp.). Euphytica 5:41–50Google Scholar
  5. Cardona C (1989) Insects and other invertebrate bean pests in Latin America. In: Schwartz HF, Pastor-Corrales MA (eds) Bean production problems in the tropics, 2nd edn. CIAT, Cali, Colombia, pp 505–570Google Scholar
  6. Garza R (1992) Identificación de los componentes de la resistencia al ataque del picudo del ejote, Apion godmani, que poseen los materiales de frijol seleccionados. In: Informe de investigación 1991 del proyecto Apion en México. SARH-INIFAPCEVAMEX, Chapingo, Mexico, pp 13–22Google Scholar
  7. Garza R, Castillo S (1991) Seleción de genotipos de frijol resistentes al ataque del picudo del ejote Apion spp. In: Informe 1990 del proyecto Apion en México. SARH-INIFAP-CEVAMEX, Chapingo, Mexico, pp 2–12Google Scholar
  8. Garza R, Muruaga JS (1993) Resistencia al ataque del picudo del ejote Apion spp. en frijol Phaseolus spp. Agron Mesoam 4:77–80Google Scholar
  9. Guevara J (1961) El combate del picudo del ejote mediante la combinación de variedades resistentes e insecticidas. Agric Téc Méx 1(2):17–19Google Scholar
  10. Guevara J, Patiño G, Casas E (1962) Selección de variedades de fríjol resistentes al picudo del ejote. Agric Téc Méx 1(10):10–12Google Scholar
  11. Koenig R, Gepts P (1989) Segregation and linkage of genes for seed proteins, isozymes, and morphological traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) J Hered 80:455–459Google Scholar
  12. Mancía JE (1973) Evaluatión de variedades de frijol tolerantes al picudo de la vaina Apion godmani (Wagn). SIADES (El Salvador) 2:15–20Google Scholar
  13. McKelvey JJ, Guevara J, Cortés A (1947) Apion pod weevil: a pest of beans in Mexico. J Econ Entomol 40:476–479Google Scholar
  14. Paredes OM, Gepts P (1995) Segregation and recombination in inter-gene pool crosses of Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Hered 86:98–106Google Scholar
  15. Ramírez M, Casas E, Rubio A (1959) Susceptibilidad de algunas variedades de fríjol al picudo del ejote en la Mesa Central. Agric Téc Méx 1(7):6, 37–38Google Scholar
  16. Shivakoti GP, Domínguez B, Vera J (1989) Pérdidas en frijol causadas por el picudo del ejote Apion godmani Wagn. Agrociencia 76:231–241Google Scholar
  17. Singh SP (1982) A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop (CO) 25:92–94Google Scholar
  18. Singh SP (1994) Gamete selection for simultaneous improvement of multiple traits in common bean. Crop Sci 34:352–355Google Scholar
  19. Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379–396Google Scholar
  20. Welsh W, Bushuk W, Roca W, Singh SP (1995) Characterization of agronomic traits and markers of recombinant inbred lines from intra- and inter-racial populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor Appl Genet 91:169–177Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Garza
    • 1
  • C. Cardona
    • 2
  • S. P. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.Programa de Entomología, CEVAMEX, INIFAPChapingo, Estado de MexicoMexico
  2. 2.Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations